Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2019

01-04-2019

Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework

Authors: Karen Campbell, Vanessa Taylor, Sheila Douglas

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Embedding online learning within higher education can provide engaging, cost-effective, interactive and flexible education. By evaluating the impact, outcomes and pedagogical influence of online cancer and education, future curricula can be shaped and delivered by higher education providers to better meet learner, health care provider and educational commissioners’ requirements for enhanced patient care and service delivery needs. Using the Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of educational evaluation, a systematic review of the effectiveness of online cancer education for nurses and allied health professionals was conducted. From 101 articles, 30 papers were included in the review. Educational theory is not always employed. There is an absence of longitudinal studies to examine impact; an absence of reliability and/or validity testing of measures, limited experimental designs taking account of power and few attempts to mitigate bias. There is, however, an emerging innovative use of mobile/spaced learning techniques. Evidence for clinical and educational effectiveness is weak offering insights into experiences and participant perceptions rather than concrete quantitative data and patient-reported outcomes. More pedagogical research is merited to inform effective evaluation of online cancer education, which incorporates and demonstrates a longer-term impact.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DL (1967) Evaluation of training. In: Craig RL, Bittel LR (eds) Training and development handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York Kirkpatrick DL (1967) Evaluation of training. In: Craig RL, Bittel LR (eds) Training and development handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York
11.
go back to reference McInally W, Masters H, Key S (2012) The impact of paediatric oncology education on clinical practice—a phenomenological study. European Journal Oncology Nursing 16:498–504CrossRef McInally W, Masters H, Key S (2012) The impact of paediatric oncology education on clinical practice—a phenomenological study. European Journal Oncology Nursing 16:498–504CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McGuigan D, Moule P, Lockyer L (2008) An evaluation of an approach to e-learning in a cancer care setting. Cancer Nursing Practice 7:37–41 McGuigan D, Moule P, Lockyer L (2008) An evaluation of an approach to e-learning in a cancer care setting. Cancer Nursing  Practice 7:37–41
18.
go back to reference Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA, Bester CJ (2002) Evaluation of the effect of a computer-based teaching programme developed on knowledge, problem solving and learning approach. Heal SA Gesondheid 7(4):80–97 Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA, Bester CJ (2002) Evaluation of the effect of a computer-based teaching programme developed on knowledge, problem solving and learning approach. Heal SA Gesondheid 7(4):80–97
19.
go back to reference Hall P, Weaver L, Willett TG (2011) Addressing suffering through an inter-professional online module: learning with, from, and about each other. Journal. Palliative Care 27:244–246CrossRef Hall P, Weaver L, Willett TG (2011) Addressing suffering through an inter-professional online module: learning with, from, and about each other. Journal. Palliative Care 27:244–246CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Letizia M, Jones T (2012) An educational intervention for nurse practitioners providing palliative care in nursing homes. Journal Hospital Palliative Nursing 14:351–357CrossRef Letizia M, Jones T (2012) An educational intervention for nurse practitioners providing palliative care in nursing homes. Journal Hospital Palliative Nursing 14:351–357CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moore S, Hunt P, Darlison L, Russell D, Glenhill D, Brighton D (2012) Improving nurses skills through e-learning. Cancer Nurs Pract 11(1):14–19CrossRef Moore S, Hunt P, Darlison L, Russell D, Glenhill D, Brighton D (2012) Improving nurses skills through e-learning. Cancer Nurs Pract 11(1):14–19CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith T, Gordon T (2009) Developing spiritual and religious care competencies in practice: pilot of a Marie Curie blended learning event. International Journal Palliative Nursing 15:86CrossRef Smith T, Gordon T (2009) Developing spiritual and religious care competencies in practice: pilot of a Marie Curie blended learning event. International Journal Palliative Nursing 15:86CrossRef
28.
33.
go back to reference Probost H, Eddy D, Doughty JO, Hodgson D (2009) Integrating E-learning into postgraduate radiotherapy and oncology education: a case study. E-Learning Digital Media 6:363–371CrossRef Probost H, Eddy D, Doughty JO, Hodgson D (2009) Integrating E-learning into postgraduate radiotherapy and oncology education: a case study. E-Learning Digital Media 6:363–371CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Smith S, Arnold G, Kinghorn S, Poppleton A (2010) Using e-learning to develop communication skills when assessing patients’ end of life needs. Nurs Times 106:20–22PubMed Smith S, Arnold G, Kinghorn S, Poppleton A (2010) Using e-learning to develop communication skills when assessing patients’ end of life needs. Nurs Times 106:20–22PubMed
35.
go back to reference Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA (2002) Evaluation of a computer-based teaching programme (CBTP) developed for student nurses in an oncology clinical setting. Heal SA Gesondheid 7:70–79 Joubert A, Viljoen MJ, Venter JA (2002) Evaluation of a computer-based teaching programme (CBTP) developed for student nurses in an oncology clinical setting. Heal SA Gesondheid 7:70–79
39.
go back to reference Lewis L (2008) E-learning in cervical screening techniques. Primary Health Care 18(5):22–23 Lewis L (2008) E-learning in cervical screening techniques. Primary Health Care 18(5):22–23
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of Online Cancer Education for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals; a Systematic Review Using Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework
Authors
Karen Campbell
Vanessa Taylor
Sheila Douglas
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1308-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine