Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2016

01-12-2016

A Nationwide Medical Student Assessment of Oncology Education

Authors: Malcolm D. Mattes, Krishnan R. Patel, Lindsay M. Burt, Ariel E. Hirsch

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the USA, but there is minimal data on how oncology is taught to medical students. The purpose of this study is to characterize oncology education at US medical schools. An electronic survey was sent between December 2014 and February 2015 to a convenience sample of medical students who either attended the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting or serve as delegates to the American Association of Medical Colleges. Information on various aspects of oncology instruction at participants’ medical schools was collected. Seventy-six responses from students in 28 states were received. Among the six most common causes of death in the USA, cancer reportedly received the fourth most curricular time. During the first, second, and third years of medical school, participants most commonly reported 6–10, 16–20, and 6–10 h of oncology teaching, respectively. Participants were less confident in their understanding of cancer treatment than workup/diagnosis or basic science/natural history of cancer (p < 0.01). During the preclinical years, pathologists, scientists/Ph.D.’s, and medical oncologists reportedly performed the majority of teaching, whereas during the clinical clerkships, medical and surgical oncologists reportedly performed the majority of teaching. Radiation oncologists were significantly less involved during both periods (p < 0.01). Most schools did not require any oncology-oriented clerkship. During each mandatory rotation, <20 % of patients had a primary diagnosis of cancer. Oncology education is often underemphasized and fragmented with wide variability in content and structure between medical schools, suggesting a need for reform.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) The state of cancer care in America, 2015: a report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Oncol Pract 11:79–113CrossRef American Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) The state of cancer care in America, 2015: a report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Oncol Pract 11:79–113CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Onega T, Duell EJ, Shi X et al (2008) Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer 112:909–918CrossRefPubMed Onega T, Duell EJ, Shi X et al (2008) Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer 112:909–918CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gaffan J, Dacre J, Jones A (2006) Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review. J Clin Oncol 24:1932–1939CrossRefPubMed Gaffan J, Dacre J, Jones A (2006) Educating undergraduate medical students about oncology: a literature review. J Clin Oncol 24:1932–1939CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tattersall MH, Langlands AO, Smith W et al (1993) Undergraduate education about cancer. A survey of clinical oncologists and clinicians responsible for cancer teaching in Australian medical schools. Eur J Cancer 29a:1639–1642CrossRefPubMed Tattersall MH, Langlands AO, Smith W et al (1993) Undergraduate education about cancer. A survey of clinical oncologists and clinicians responsible for cancer teaching in Australian medical schools. Eur J Cancer 29a:1639–1642CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Oncology Education Committee (2007) Ideal oncology curriculum for medical schools. The Cancer Council Australia Oncology Education Committee (2007) Ideal oncology curriculum for medical schools. The Cancer Council Australia
8.
go back to reference Pavlidis N, Gatzemeier W, Popescu R et al (2010) The masterclass of the european school of oncology: the ‘key educational event’ of the school. Eur J Cancer 46:2159–2165CrossRefPubMed Pavlidis N, Gatzemeier W, Popescu R et al (2010) The masterclass of the european school of oncology: the ‘key educational event’ of the school. Eur J Cancer 46:2159–2165CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pavlidis N, Vermorken JB, Stahel R et al (2012) Undergraduate training in oncology: an ESO continuing challenge for medical students. Surg Oncol 21:15–21CrossRefPubMed Pavlidis N, Vermorken JB, Stahel R et al (2012) Undergraduate training in oncology: an ESO continuing challenge for medical students. Surg Oncol 21:15–21CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference DeNunzio NJ, Joseph L, Handal R et al (2013) Devising the optimal preclinical oncology curriculum for undergraduate medical students in the United States. J Cancer Educ 28:228–236CrossRefPubMed DeNunzio NJ, Joseph L, Handal R et al (2013) Devising the optimal preclinical oncology curriculum for undergraduate medical students in the United States. J Cancer Educ 28:228–236CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6(3), e34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6(3), e34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Pavlidis N (1997) Undergraduate education in oncology in the Balkans and Middle East. The Metsovo Statement, April 4, 1997. Ann Oncol 8:1281CrossRefPubMed Pavlidis N (1997) Undergraduate education in oncology in the Balkans and Middle East. The Metsovo Statement, April 4, 1997. Ann Oncol 8:1281CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference American Medical Association (2014) Physician characteristics and distribution in the U.S. 2014. American Medical Association, Chicago American Medical Association (2014) Physician characteristics and distribution in the U.S. 2014. American Medical Association, Chicago
14.
go back to reference Noonan K, Tong KM, Laskin J et al (2014) Referral patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on delivery of treatment and survival in a contemporary population based cohort. Lung Cancer 86:344–349CrossRefPubMed Noonan K, Tong KM, Laskin J et al (2014) Referral patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on delivery of treatment and survival in a contemporary population based cohort. Lung Cancer 86:344–349CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bekelman JE, Suneja G, Guzzo T et al (2013) Effect of practice integration between urologists and radiation oncologists on prostate cancer treatment patterns. J Urol 190:97–101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bekelman JE, Suneja G, Guzzo T et al (2013) Effect of practice integration between urologists and radiation oncologists on prostate cancer treatment patterns. J Urol 190:97–101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Dennis KE, Duncan G (2010) Radiation oncology in undergraduate medical education: a literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:649–655CrossRefPubMed Dennis KE, Duncan G (2010) Radiation oncology in undergraduate medical education: a literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:649–655CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference DeNunzio N, Parekh A, Hirsch AE (2010) Mentoring medical students in radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol 7:722–728CrossRefPubMed DeNunzio N, Parekh A, Hirsch AE (2010) Mentoring medical students in radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol 7:722–728CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Berman AT, Plastaras JP, Vapiwala N (2013) Radiation oncology: a primer for medical students. J Cancer Educ 28:547–553CrossRefPubMed Berman AT, Plastaras JP, Vapiwala N (2013) Radiation oncology: a primer for medical students. J Cancer Educ 28:547–553CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Agarwal A, DeNunzio NJ, Ahuja D et al (2014) Beyond the standard curriculum: a review of available opportunities for medical students to prepare for a career in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:39–44CrossRefPubMed Agarwal A, DeNunzio NJ, Ahuja D et al (2014) Beyond the standard curriculum: a review of available opportunities for medical students to prepare for a career in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:39–44CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hansen JT, Rubin P (1998) Clinical anatomy in the oncology patient: a preclinical elective that reinforces cross-sectional anatomy using examples of cancer spread patterns. Clin Anat 11:95–99CrossRefPubMed Hansen JT, Rubin P (1998) Clinical anatomy in the oncology patient: a preclinical elective that reinforces cross-sectional anatomy using examples of cancer spread patterns. Clin Anat 11:95–99CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hirsch AE, Handal R, Daniels J et al (2012) Quantitatively and qualitatively augmenting medical student knowledge of oncology and radiation oncology: an update on the impact of the oncology education initiative. J Am Coll Radiol 9:115–120CrossRefPubMed Hirsch AE, Handal R, Daniels J et al (2012) Quantitatively and qualitatively augmenting medical student knowledge of oncology and radiation oncology: an update on the impact of the oncology education initiative. J Am Coll Radiol 9:115–120CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Zumwalt AC, Marks L, Halperin EC (2007) Integrating gross anatomy into a clinical oncology curriculum: the oncoanatomy course at Duke University School of Medicine. Acad Med 82:469–474CrossRefPubMed Zumwalt AC, Marks L, Halperin EC (2007) Integrating gross anatomy into a clinical oncology curriculum: the oncoanatomy course at Duke University School of Medicine. Acad Med 82:469–474CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference National Resident Matching Program (2014) Charting outcomes in the match, 2014. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC National Resident Matching Program (2014) Charting outcomes in the match, 2014. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC
Metadata
Title
A Nationwide Medical Student Assessment of Oncology Education
Authors
Malcolm D. Mattes
Krishnan R. Patel
Lindsay M. Burt
Ariel E. Hirsch
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0872-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine