Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2016

01-06-2016

Experiences of Cervical Cancer Survivors in Rural Eastern North Carolina: a Qualitative Assessment

Authors: Alice R. Richman, Jamie L. Troutman, Essie Torres

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Little qualitative research has been conducted with cervical cancer survivors. We sought to understand the experiences of survivors in rural Eastern North Carolina and identify any barriers which may have kept women from receiving preventive Papanicolaou screenings or follow-up care. We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 low-income and underserved cervical cancer survivors living in Eastern North Carolina. Participants included English-speaking women who attended a large cancer center for care between March 2012 and March 2013. Participants ranged from being recently diagnosed with cervical cancer to being 15 years post-diagnosis. Interviews lasted approximately 1 h and were audio-tape-recorded. On average, women were 55 years old (range 35–85) and were diagnosed with cervical cancer 3 years prior to the interview (range 0.2 to 180 months). A good proportion was uninsured or Medicaid-insured (60 %). Half reported an annual household income of less than $20,000, and 13 % reported having a college degree. The majority of survivors had limited understanding of cervical cancer, experienced persistent symptoms related to their cancer before seeking care, and were nonadherent to Papanicolaou screening recommendations. The main barriers to care reported by participants was lack of money and health insurance, followed by the perception of overall health (which equated to the belief that medical care was not needed), transportation issues, and discomfort with provider. Health professionals should focus educational efforts on the benefits of Papanicolaou screenings, the symptoms sometimes associated with cervical cancer, and the free or low-cost services available to low-income women.
Literature
3.
6.
go back to reference Denslow SA, Knop G, Klaus C et al (2012) Burden of invasive cervical cancer in North Carolina. Prev Med 54(3–4):270–276CrossRefPubMed Denslow SA, Knop G, Klaus C et al (2012) Burden of invasive cervical cancer in North Carolina. Prev Med 54(3–4):270–276CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hildesheim A, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1999) Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(3 Pt 1):571–577CrossRefPubMed Hildesheim A, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1999) Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(3 Pt 1):571–577CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1995) The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer. Connecticut. Am J Public Health 85(6):791–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1995) The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer. Connecticut. Am J Public Health 85(6):791–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D (1989) Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 18(1):133–146CrossRefPubMed Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D (1989) Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 18(1):133–146CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD (2003) Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med 37(5):475–484CrossRefPubMed Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD (2003) Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med 37(5):475–484CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Behbakht K, Lynch A, Teal S et al (2004) Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstet Gynecol 104(6):1355–1361CrossRefPubMed Behbakht K, Lynch A, Teal S et al (2004) Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstet Gynecol 104(6):1355–1361CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Das IP et al (2007) Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. J Women’s Health 16(3):311–330CrossRef Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Das IP et al (2007) Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. J Women’s Health 16(3):311–330CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Salz T, Gottlieb SL, Smith JS et al (2010) The association between cervical abnormalities and attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention. J Women’s Health 19(11):2011–2016CrossRef Salz T, Gottlieb SL, Smith JS et al (2010) The association between cervical abnormalities and attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention. J Women’s Health 19(11):2011–2016CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cyrus-David MS, Michielutte R, Paskett ED et al (2002) Cervical cancer risk as a predictor of Pap smear use in rural North Carolina. J Rural Health 18(1):67–76CrossRefPubMed Cyrus-David MS, Michielutte R, Paskett ED et al (2002) Cervical cancer risk as a predictor of Pap smear use in rural North Carolina. J Rural Health 18(1):67–76CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ashing-Giwa KT, Kagawa-Singer M, Padilla GV et al (2004) The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study. Psycho-Oncology 13(10):709–728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ashing-Giwa KT, Kagawa-Singer M, Padilla GV et al (2004) The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study. Psycho-Oncology 13(10):709–728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Guilfoyle S, Franco R, Gorin SS (2007) Exploring older women’s approaches to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 28(10):930–950CrossRefPubMed Guilfoyle S, Franco R, Gorin SS (2007) Exploring older women’s approaches to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 28(10):930–950CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L et al (2012) Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG-Int J Obstet Gy 119(1):26–32CrossRef Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L et al (2012) Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG-Int J Obstet Gy 119(1):26–32CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Experiences of Cervical Cancer Survivors in Rural Eastern North Carolina: a Qualitative Assessment
Authors
Alice R. Richman
Jamie L. Troutman
Essie Torres
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0809-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine