Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

Slender transradial iliac artery stenting using a 4.5 French guiding sheath

Authors: Norihiko Shinozaki, Takashi Minowa, Tsutomu Murakami, Yohei Ohno, Masataka Nakano, Toshiharu Fujii, Gaku Nakazawa, Fuminobu Yoshimachi, Yuji Ikari

Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

We previously reported safety and usefulness of transradial iliac artery stenting using 6 Fr guiding sheath. However, radial artery occlusion was a major limitation of this procedure. We analyzed the safety and utility of slender transradial iliac artery stenting using a 4.5 Fr guiding sheath to prevent radial artery occlusion. We performed transradial iliac artery stenting in left radial artery, using a 4.5 Fr sheath incorporating a shaft length of 110 cm, for 34 lesions in 29 patients. Transradial intervention was attempted at the discretion of the operator. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Cases with scheduled multiple sheath insertions for a bidirectional approach were excluded. Twenty-three (79.3%) patients were male. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 11 (37.9%), 27 (93.1%), 19 (65.5%), and 24 (82.8%) patients, respectively. Nine lesions (26.5%) were diagnosed as chronic total occlusion. All lesions were successfully treated using a total of 40 stents incorporating a 4.5 Fr radial access system. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) significantly improved from 0.68 ± 0.15 to 0.99 ± 0.17 (p < 0.0001) after the procedure. No patients had procedural or access site-related complications such as hematoma, major bleeding, blood transfusion, stroke, cholesterol embolism, aortic dissection, or arterial perforation. Radial artery occlusion was absent in all cases. ABI value was well maintained at 0.98 ± 0.13 at 1 year, and no target lesion revascularizations were reported. Slender transradial iliac artery stenting using a 4.5 Fr guiding sheath is safe, feasible, and less invasive, and shows no incidence of radial artery occlusion, in carefully selected patient populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, Suzuki K, Hirano K, et al. Contemporary outcomes after endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac artery disease. Circ J. 2012;76:2697–704.CrossRefPubMed Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, Suzuki K, Hirano K, et al. Contemporary outcomes after endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac artery disease. Circ J. 2012;76:2697–704.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shinozaki N, Ogata N, Ikari Y. Initial results of transradial iliac artery stenting. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:51–4.CrossRef Shinozaki N, Ogata N, Ikari Y. Initial results of transradial iliac artery stenting. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:51–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Roy AK, Garot P, Louvard Y, Neylon A, Spaziano M, Sawaya FJ, et al. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral access for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:880–8.CrossRefPubMed Roy AK, Garot P, Louvard Y, Neylon A, Spaziano M, Sawaya FJ, et al. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral access for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:880–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Coscas R, de Blic R, Capdevila C, Javerliat I, Goeau-Brissonniere O, Coggia M. Percutaneous radial access for peripheral transluminal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:463–8.CrossRefPubMed Coscas R, de Blic R, Capdevila C, Javerliat I, Goeau-Brissonniere O, Coggia M. Percutaneous radial access for peripheral transluminal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:463–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cortese B, Trani C, Lorenzoni R, Sbarzaglia P, Latib A, Tommasino A, et al. Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:280–4.CrossRefPubMed Cortese B, Trani C, Lorenzoni R, Sbarzaglia P, Latib A, Tommasino A, et al. Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:280–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lorenzoni R, Lisi C, Corciu A, Lazzari M, Bovenzi F. Tailored use of transradial access for above-the-knee angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:635–40.CrossRefPubMed Lorenzoni R, Lisi C, Corciu A, Lazzari M, Bovenzi F. Tailored use of transradial access for above-the-knee angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:635–40.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yatskar L, Selzer F, Feit F, Cohen HA, Jacobs AK, Williams DO, et al. Access site hematoma requiring blood transfusion predicts mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:961–6.CrossRefPubMed Yatskar L, Selzer F, Feit F, Cohen HA, Jacobs AK, Williams DO, et al. Access site hematoma requiring blood transfusion predicts mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:961–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cox N, Resnic FS, Popma JJ, Simon DI, Eisenhauer AC, Rogers C. Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1174–7.CrossRefPubMed Cox N, Resnic FS, Popma JJ, Simon DI, Eisenhauer AC, Rogers C. Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1174–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hamon M, Coutance G. Transradial intervention for minimizing bleeding complications in percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:55C–9C.CrossRefPubMed Hamon M, Coutance G. Transradial intervention for minimizing bleeding complications in percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:55C–9C.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:349–56.CrossRefPubMed Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:349–56.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–75.CrossRefPubMed Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:1047–54.CrossRefPubMed Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:1047–54.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465–76.CrossRef Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shinozaki N, Minowa T, Ikari Y. Transradial intervention for chronic total occlusion at the external iliac artery using a bidirectional approach through a single guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:174–7.CrossRefPubMed Shinozaki N, Minowa T, Ikari Y. Transradial intervention for chronic total occlusion at the external iliac artery using a bidirectional approach through a single guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:174–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:173–8.CrossRefPubMed Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:173–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Slender transradial iliac artery stenting using a 4.5 French guiding sheath
Authors
Norihiko Shinozaki
Takashi Minowa
Tsutomu Murakami
Yohei Ohno
Masataka Nakano
Toshiharu Fujii
Gaku Nakazawa
Fuminobu Yoshimachi
Yuji Ikari
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1868-4300
Electronic ISSN: 1868-4297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-017-0506-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 1/2019 Go to the issue