Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Endoscopy | Original Article

A study on confocal endomicroscopy in comparison with histopathology for polypoidal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: A prospective single-centre experience

Authors: Parvez Ahmed Shah, Bhavik Bharat Shah, Vijay Kumar Rai, Enam Khan, Mahesh Kumar Goenka

Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) has a potential to make optical diagnosis of neoplastic polypoidal lesions and may replace traditional histology in the proposed “diagnose and discard approach”. The present study was planned to assess the accuracy of probe-based CLE in predicting histology of polypoidal lesions of gastrointestinal (GI) tract in vivo before their removal.

Methods

In this prospective single-centre study, patients with upper and/or lower GI polypoidal lesions were enrolled. After detection of polypoidal lesions with white light endoscopy, probe-based CLE examination was performed. Real-time and offline presumptive CLE diagnosis of polypoidal lesions was made as per Miami classification and was compared with histopathology as the gold standard.

Results

A total of 50 GI polyps from 50 patients (28 males) were assessed. The mean (±SD) size of polyps was 13.7 (± 8.5) mm. Most polyps were located at the cecum (24.0%) or stomach (24.0%). On histological examination, hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps, adenocarcinoma, and lipoma were seen in 54%, 26%, 18% and 2% patients, respectively. On comparison of real-time CLE examination with histopathology, 40 (83.3%) and 8 patients (16.7%) had concordant and discordant results, respectively. Two polyps were inconclusively diagnosed on CLE. On offline examination, concordance with histopathology was observed in 85.4% (n = 41) of polyps, which was marginally better than online examination, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.45). On comparing the real-time and offline findings of CLE, concordance was found in 91.7% of the cases. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values on real-time evaluation were 83.3%, 87.5%, 79.1%, 80.7%, and 86.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

CLE is a useful tool for prediction of histology to assess the polypoidal lesions of the GI tract, and it may avoid polypectomy at least in some patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M, et al. In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe an examiner blinded analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1261–7. Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M, et al. In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe an examiner blinded analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1261–7.
2.
go back to reference Pohl J, Nguyen-Tat M, Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T, Ell C. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;10:562–9.CrossRef Pohl J, Nguyen-Tat M, Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T, Ell C. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;10:562–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1174–81.CrossRef Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1174–81.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:42–7.CrossRef Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:42–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T, Sato T, Senba S, Kanazawa K. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1602–8.CrossRef Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T, Sato T, Senba S, Kanazawa K. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1602–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tung SY, Wu CS, Su MY. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2628–32.CrossRef Tung SY, Wu CS, Su MY. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2628–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1171–8.CrossRef Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1171–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1094–8. Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1094–8.
9.
go back to reference Chauhan SS, Dayyeh BK, Bhat YM, Gottlieb KT, Hwang JH, Komanduri S. Confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:928–38.CrossRef Chauhan SS, Dayyeh BK, Bhat YM, Gottlieb KT, Hwang JH, Komanduri S. Confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:928–38.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shieh FK, Drumm H, Nathanson MH, Jamidar PA. High-definition confocal endomicroscopy of the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:401–6.CrossRef Shieh FK, Drumm H, Nathanson MH, Jamidar PA. High-definition confocal endomicroscopy of the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:401–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58 Suppl:S3–43. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58 Suppl:S3–43.
12.
go back to reference Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, et al. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 43:882–91. Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, et al. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011 43:882–91.
13.
go back to reference Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–5. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–5.
14.
go back to reference Rubio CA, Nesi G, Messerini L, et al. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1697–703. Rubio CA, Nesi G, Messerini L, et al. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1697–703.
15.
go back to reference Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Heckman MG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and narrow band imaging for small colorectal polyps: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:231–9. Shahid MW, Buchner AM, Heckman MG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and narrow band imaging for small colorectal polyps: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:231–9.
16.
go back to reference Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:706–13. Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M, et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:706–13.
17.
go back to reference Hurlstone DP, Baraza W, Brown S, Thomson M, Tiffin N, Cross SS. In vivo real-time confocal laser scanning endomicroscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia. Br J Surg. 2008;95:636–45.CrossRef Hurlstone DP, Baraza W, Brown S, Thomson M, Tiffin N, Cross SS. In vivo real-time confocal laser scanning endomicroscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia. Br J Surg. 2008;95:636–45.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;7:419–22. Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;7:419–22.
Metadata
Title
A study on confocal endomicroscopy in comparison with histopathology for polypoidal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: A prospective single-centre experience
Authors
Parvez Ahmed Shah
Bhavik Bharat Shah
Vijay Kumar Rai
Enam Khan
Mahesh Kumar Goenka
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Electronic ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-019-00973-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2019 Go to the issue