Top

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

Published in:

01-03-2021 | Review Paper

Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration

Author: Geraldo Roberto Martins Matos

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Introduction

Dental implants are a usual treatment for the loss of teeth. The success of this therapy is due to the predictability, safety and longevity of the bone–implant interface. Dental implant surface characteristics like roughness, chemical constitution, and mechanical factors can contribute to the early osseointegration. The aim of the present article is to perform a review of the literature on surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration.

Methodology

This work is a narrative review of some aspects of surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration.

Conclusion

Despite technological advancement in the biomaterials field, the ideal surface roughness for osseointegration still remains unclear. In this study about surface nanoroughness of dental implant and osseointegration, the clinical relevance is yet unknown. Innovative findings on nanoroughness are valuable in the fields of dental implantology, maxillofacial or orthopedic implant surfaces and also on cardiovascular implants in permanent contact with patient’s blood.

Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2019) On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 21:4–7PubMedCrossRef

American Academy of Implant Dentistry (1986) Glossary of implant terms. J Oral Implantol 12:284–294

Albrektsson T, Zarb GA (1993) Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 6:95–105PubMed

Matos GRM, Godoy MF (2015) Factors associated with long-term stability of dental implants. Full Dent Sci 6:194–198

Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2014) Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 41:443–476PubMedCrossRef

Smeets R, Henningsen A, Jung O, Heiland M, Hammächer C, Stein JM (2014) Definition, etiology, prevention and treatment of peri-implantitis: a review. Head Face Med 10:34PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gómez-de Diego R, Mang-de la Rosa R, Romero-Pérez M-J, Cutando-Soriano A, López-Valverde-Centeno A (2014) Indications and contraindications of dental implants in medically compromised patients: update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 19:483–489CrossRef

Dohan EDM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T (2010) Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 28:198–206CrossRef

Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA (2009) Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:185–206PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bagno A, Di Bello C (2004) Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:935–949PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hotchkiss KM, Sowers KT, Olivares-Navarrete R (2019) Novel in vitro comparative model of osteogenic and inflammatory cell response to dental implants. Dent Mater 35:176–184PubMedCrossRef

12.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2009) Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20(Suppl. 4):172–184PubMedCrossRef

13.

Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y (2007) Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 23:844–854PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ma Q-L, Zhao L-Z, Liu R-R et al (2014) Improved implant osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium surface via mediation of macrophage polarization. Biomaterials 35:9853–9867PubMedCrossRef

15.

Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M et al (2005) High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 74:49–58PubMedCrossRef

16.

Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Albouy J-P, Lindhe J (2007) Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:147–152PubMedCrossRef

17.

Coelho PG, Jimbo R, Tovar N, Bonfante EA (2015) Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales. Dent Mater 31:37–52PubMedCrossRef

18.

Buser D, Janner SFM, Wittneben J-G, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE (2012) 10-Year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 14:839–851PubMedCrossRef

19.

Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV (2014) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 7:CD003815

20.

Abraham CM (2014) A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Open Dent J. 8(1):50–55PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J (2004) Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 25:1429–1438PubMedCrossRef

22.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B (2018) Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. Eur J Oral Implantol. 11(suppl 1):S123–S136PubMed

23.

Fischer K, Stenberg T (2012) Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:808–815PubMedCrossRef

24.

Pachauri P, Bathala LR, Sangur R (2014) Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications. J Adv Prosthodont 6:498–504PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Mendonça G, Mendonça DBS, Aragão FJL, Cooper LF (2008) Advancing dental implant surface technology: from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 29:3822–3835PubMedCrossRef

26.

Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T (2011) Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 3:59–67PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

27.

Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Vazquez L, Park Y-J, Sammartino G, Bernard J-P (2011) Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces. J Oral Implantol 37:525–542PubMedCrossRef

28.

Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU (2004) Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25:4731–4739PubMedCrossRef

29.

Alghamdi HS (2018) Methods to improve osseointegration of dental implants in low quality (type-IV) bone: an overview. J Funct Biomater. 9:pii:E7CrossRef

30.

Jemat A, Ghazali MJ, Razali M, Otsuka Y (2015) Surface modifications and their effects on titanium dental implants. Biomed Res Int 2015:791725PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Elias CN, Meirelles LA (2010) Improving osseointegration of dental implants. Expert Rev Med Devices 7:241–256PubMedCrossRef

32.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J (2003) Surface topography of titanium implants. Clin Periodontol Implant Dent 4:821–825

33.

Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG (2012) Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 16:169–180PubMedCrossRef

34.

Andrukhov O, Huber R, Shi B et al (2016) Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness. Dent Mater 32:1374–1384PubMedCrossRef

35.

Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2016) Turned versus anodised dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1949–1964PubMedCrossRef

36.

Siegel RW, Fougere GE (1995) Mechanical properties of nanophase metals. Nanostruct Mater 6:205–216CrossRef

37.

Song Y, Ju Y, Morita Y, Song G (2013) Effect of the nanostructure of porous alumina on growth behavior of MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biosci Bioeng 116:509–515PubMedCrossRef

38.

Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, Feng Q, Cui FZ, Watari F (2013) Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 101:2424–2435PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wennerberg A, Svanborg Melin L, Berner S, Andersson M (2013) Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24:203–209PubMedCrossRef

40.

Jindal S, Bansal R, Singh BP et al (2014) Enhanced osteoblast proliferation and corrosion resistance of commercially pure titanium through surface nanostructuring by ultrasonic shot peening and stress relieving. J Oral Implantol. 40 Spec No:347–355PubMedCrossRef

41.

Wennerberg A, Jimbo R, Stübinger S, Obrecht M, Dard M, Berner S (2014) Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Impl Res 25:1041–1050CrossRef

42.

Traini T, Murmura G, Sinjari B et al (2018) The surface anodization of titanium dental implants improves blood clot formation followed by osseointegration. Coatings 8:252CrossRef

43.

Subramani K, Lavenus S, Rozé J, Louarn G, Layrolle P (2018) Impact of nanotechnology on dental implants. In: Subramani K, Ahmed W (eds) Emerging nanotechnologies in dentistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 71–83

44.

Yazdani J, Ahmadian E, Sharifi S, Shahi S, Maleki Dizaj S (2018) A short view on nanohydroxyapatite as coating of dental implants. Biomed Pharmacother 105:553–557PubMedCrossRef

45.

Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L, Hüttig F (2018) Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dent Mater 34:40–57PubMedCrossRef

Title: Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration
Author: Geraldo Roberto Martins Matos
Publication date: 01-03-2021
Publisher: Springer India
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01437-5

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration

Abstract

Introduction

Methodology

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methodology

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Emerging Trends of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures and Their Etiological Analysis in a Tertiary Health Centre from Eastern India: A Retrospective Study

Management of White-Eyed Blowout Fracture in the Pediatric Population

Correlation Between Height and Impacted Third Molars and Genetics Role in Third Molar Impaction

Pedicled Islanded Nasolabial Flap Tunneled Under Mandible for Tongue Reconstruction

Tongue-Shaped Haemangioma Involving Buccinator Muscle Treated by Intraoral Surgical Excision: A Unique Case Report

The Application of Pre-operative Three-Dimensional Models in the Management of Mandibular Pathology: Is it Really Useful? An Institutional Study