Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Special Article

Development of a national minimum data set to monitor deceased organ donation performance in Canada

Authors: Karen Hornby, BScN, MS, Sam D. Shemie, MD, Amber Appleby, RN, BScN, MM, Nancy Dodd, BSc, ME, Jaghir Gill, MD, MPh, Joseph Kim, MD, PhD, MHS, Andreas Kramer, MD, MSc, D. Jim Kutsogiannis, MD, MHS, Nick Lahaie, Janet MacLean, Louise Rehel, Greg Webster, MSc, Juliana Wu, BA, Damon C. Scales, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Deceased donation data requires standardization to enable accurate interprovincial and international comparisons of deceased donation performance. In Canada, most provincial organ donation organizations (ODOs) have developed different processes and infrastructures for referring potential donors and subsequent data collection. This has led to differing definitions of the performance measures used for each step in the donation process, from potential donor identification to consent to transplantation. The Deceased Donation Data Working Group (DDDWG), comprised of representatives from ODOs across Canada, was therefore convened by Canadian Blood Services to develop a national, comprehensive, standardized deceased donation minimum data set.

Methods

The DDDWG’s scope encompassed considering all potential deceased organ donation data elements, including operational and performance data collected along the deceased donor pathway from donation potential to donation and disposition of organs. An environmental scan was conducted of other existing deceased donation registries from the Canadian and the international community. The DDDWG then engaged in regular face-to-face meetings and teleconferences to develop recommendations for the minimum data set that would satisfy key considerations, including the impact on existing ODO data collection processes, financial impact on stakeholders, the clinical and operational needs of multiple healthcare professionals involved in the deceased donation pathway, and availability of other existing national data sets that could be leveraged to reduce data collection burden.

Results

The key deceased donation data elements identified by the DDDWG are contained in an inverted pyramid framework that was derived from similar work conducted in other countries.

Conclusion

The DDDWG developed recommendations for proposed definitions and data sources that should be adopted nationally to guide the collection of deceased donation data. The ultimate purpose of the final minimum data set is to harmonize and standardize donation data definitions in Canada and align with international standards; inform the development of operational and clinical practice standards at the provincial and national levels; develop a framework for deceased donation performance measures; and advance the science of deceased donation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Domınguez-Gil BD, Delmonico FL, Shaheen FA, et al. The critical pathway for deceased donation: reportable uniformity in the approach to deceased donation. Transplant Int 2011; 24: 373-8.CrossRef Domınguez-Gil BD, Delmonico FL, Shaheen FA, et al. The critical pathway for deceased donation: reportable uniformity in the approach to deceased donation. Transplant Int 2011; 24: 373-8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Souter MJ, Blissitt PA, Blosser S, et al. Recommendations for the critical care management of devastating brain injury: prognostication, psychosocial, and ethical management: a position statement for healthcare professionals form the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23: 4-13.CrossRefPubMed Souter MJ, Blissitt PA, Blosser S, et al. Recommendations for the critical care management of devastating brain injury: prognostication, psychosocial, and ethical management: a position statement for healthcare professionals form the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23: 4-13.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference de la Rosa G, Domínguez-Gil B, Matesanz R, et al. Continuously evaluating performance in deceased donation: the Spanish Quality Assurance Program. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2507-13.CrossRefPubMed de la Rosa G, Domínguez-Gil B, Matesanz R, et al. Continuously evaluating performance in deceased donation: the Spanish Quality Assurance Program. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 2507-13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sheehy E, O’Connor KJ, Luskin RS, et al. Investigating geographic variation in mortality in the context of organ donation. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 1598-602.CrossRefPubMed Sheehy E, O’Connor KJ, Luskin RS, et al. Investigating geographic variation in mortality in the context of organ donation. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 1598-602.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 667-74.CrossRefPubMed Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE, et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 667-74.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D. Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011; 41: 95-105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D. Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011; 41: 95-105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Development of a national minimum data set to monitor deceased organ donation performance in Canada
Authors
Karen Hornby, BScN, MS
Sam D. Shemie, MD
Amber Appleby, RN, BScN, MM
Nancy Dodd, BSc, ME
Jaghir Gill, MD, MPh
Joseph Kim, MD, PhD, MHS
Andreas Kramer, MD, MSc
D. Jim Kutsogiannis, MD, MHS
Nick Lahaie
Janet MacLean
Louise Rehel
Greg Webster, MSc
Juliana Wu, BA
Damon C. Scales, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-01290-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2019 Go to the issue