Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Review Article/Brief Review

What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways?

Authors: Liane S. Feldman, MD, Lawrence Lee, MD, Julio Fiore Jr, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a framework from which to measure the outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs.

Principle findings

We define the outcomes of recovery from the perspective of different stakeholders and time frames. There is no single definition of recovery. There are overlapping phases of recovery which are of particular interest to different stakeholders (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, patients and their caregivers), and the primary outcome of interest may vary depending on the phase and the perspective. In the earliest phase (from the end of the surgery to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit [PACU]), biologic and physiologic outcomes are emphasized. In the intermediate phase (from PACU to discharge from the hospital), symptoms related to pain and gastrointestinal function as well as basic activities are important. Studies of ERAS pathways have reported clinical outcomes and symptoms, including complications, hospital stay, mobilization, and gastrointestinal function, largely during hospitalization. Nevertheless, patients define recovery as return to normal functioning, a process that occurs over weeks to months (late phase). Outcomes reflecting functional status (e.g., physical activity, activities of daily living) and overall health (e.g., quality of life) are important in this phase. To date, few studies reporting the effectiveness of ERAS pathways compared with conventional care have included functional status or quality-of-life outcomes, and there is little information about recovery after discharge from hospital.

Conclusion

Recovery after surgery is a complex construct. Different outcomes are important at different phases along the recovery trajectory. Measures for quantifying recovery in hospital and after discharge are available. A consensus-based core set of outcomes with input from multiple stakeholders would facilitate research reporting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 259-84.PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 259-84.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 51-7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 51-7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS. What does it really mean to “recover” from an operation? Surgery 2014; 155: 211-6.PubMedCrossRef Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS. What does it really mean to “recover” from an operation? Surgery 2014; 155: 211-6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 159-70.PubMedCrossRef Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 159-70.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kleinbeck SV, Hoffart N. Outpatient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. AORN J 1994; 60: 394, 397-8, 401-2. Kleinbeck SV, Hoffart N. Outpatient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. AORN J 1994; 60: 394, 397-8, 401-2.
6.
go back to reference Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, et al. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 762-72.PubMedCrossRef Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, et al. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 762-72.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, King PM, Bulley S, Kennedy RH. A qualitative evaluation of patients’ experiences of an enhanced recivery programme for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: e236-42.PubMedCrossRef Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, King PM, Bulley S, Kennedy RH. A qualitative evaluation of patients’ experiences of an enhanced recivery programme for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: e236-42.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carli F, Mayo N. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 531-3.PubMedCrossRef Carli F, Mayo N. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 531-3.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Macefield RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM. Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399: 263-72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Macefield RC, Boulind CE, Blazeby JM. Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399: 263-72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Eng J Med 2010; 363(26): 2477-81.CrossRef Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Eng J Med 2010; 363(26): 2477-81.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, October 2013: 1-19. Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, October 2013: 1-19.
12.
go back to reference Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anesthesia 2014; DOI:10.1111/anae.12730. Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anesthesia 2014; DOI:10.​1111/​anae.​12730.
13.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL. A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 1053-61.PubMedCrossRef Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL. A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 1053-61.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA, de Vet HC. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 2008; 143: 206-15.PubMedCrossRef Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA, de Vet HC. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 2008; 143: 206-15.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anesth 2000; 84: 11-5.CrossRef Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anesth 2000; 84: 11-5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, et al. Measurement of quality of recovry using the QoR-40: a quantitiative systematic review. Br J Anesth 2013; 111: 161-9.CrossRef Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, et al. Measurement of quality of recovry using the QoR-40: a quantitiative systematic review. Br J Anesth 2013; 111: 161-9.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Arestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the postdischarge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16: 794-801.PubMedCrossRef Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Arestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the postdischarge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16: 794-801.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, et al. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 892-905.PubMedCrossRef Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, et al. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 892-905.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Demyttenaere S, Carli F, Fried GM, Mayo NE. Validation of a physical activity questionnaire (CHAMPS) as an indicator of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2009; 146: 31-9.PubMedCrossRef Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Demyttenaere S, Carli F, Fried GM, Mayo NE. Validation of a physical activity questionnaire (CHAMPS) as an indicator of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2009; 146: 31-9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L, Carli F. Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1083-9.PubMedCrossRef Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L, Carli F. Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1083-9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lee L, Elfassy N, Li C, et al. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility. J Surg Res 2013; 184: 108-14.PubMedCrossRef Lee L, Elfassy N, Li C, et al. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility. J Surg Res 2013; 184: 108-14.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Walk test (6-minute) (6MWT). In: Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE (Eds). Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 248-53. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Walk test (6-minute) (6MWT). In: Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE (Eds). Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making, 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 248-53.
25.
go back to reference Antonescu I, Scott S, Tran TT, Mayo NE, Feldman LS. Measuring postoperative recovery: what are clinically meaningful differences? Surgery 2014; 319: 19-27. Antonescu I, Scott S, Tran TT, Mayo NE, Feldman LS. Measuring postoperative recovery: what are clinically meaningful differences? Surgery 2014; 319: 19-27.
26.
go back to reference Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1126-41.PubMedCrossRef Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1126-41.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Antonescu I, Mueller C, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC, Mayo N, Feldman LS. Outcomes reported in high-impact surgical journals. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 582-9.PubMedCrossRef Antonescu I, Mueller C, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC, Mayo N, Feldman LS. Outcomes reported in high-impact surgical journals. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 582-9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925-30.PubMedCrossRef Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925-30.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mayo NE, Hum S, Kuspinar A. Methods and measures: what’s new for MS? Mult Scler 2013; 19: 709-13.PubMedCrossRef Mayo NE, Hum S, Kuspinar A. Methods and measures: what’s new for MS? Mult Scler 2013; 19: 709-13.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1531-48.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1531-48.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Norman G. Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 239-49.PubMedCrossRef Norman G. Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 239-49.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Barclay-Goddard R, Lix LM, Tate R, Weinberg L, Mayo NE. Response shift was identified over multiple occasions with a structured equation modeling framework. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1181-8.PubMedCrossRef Barclay-Goddard R, Lix LM, Tate R, Weinberg L, Mayo NE. Response shift was identified over multiple occasions with a structured equation modeling framework. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1181-8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21: 271-92.PubMedCrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21: 271-92.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lee L, Mata J, Augustin BR, et al. A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery. J Surg Res 2014; 190: 79-86.PubMedCrossRef Lee L, Mata J, Augustin BR, et al. A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery. J Surg Res 2014; 190: 79-86.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 482-9.PubMedCrossRef Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 482-9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF. Systematic review and meta-anaysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 172-88.PubMedCrossRef Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, Lewis SR, Alderson P, Smith AF. Systematic review and meta-anaysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 172-88.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Col Rectum 2013; 56: 667-78.CrossRef Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Col Rectum 2013; 56: 667-78.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1015-24.PubMedCrossRef Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1015-24.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2012; 36: 2879-87.PubMedCrossRef Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2012; 36: 2879-87.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011; 254: 868-75.PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011; 254: 868-75.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 851-9.PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 851-9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fiore JF Jr, Browning L, Bialocerkowski A, Gruen RL, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 270-81.PubMedCrossRef Fiore JF Jr, Browning L, Bialocerkowski A, Gruen RL, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 270-81.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM, et al. Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in The Netherlands. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1082-93.PubMedCrossRef Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM, et al. Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in The Netherlands. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1082-93.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 224-31.PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 224-31.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Fiore JF Jr, Faragher IG, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L, Denehy L. Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2917-34.CrossRef Fiore JF Jr, Faragher IG, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L, Denehy L. Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2917-34.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Fiore JF Jr, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 416-23.PubMedCrossRef Fiore JF Jr, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 416-23.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Lee L, Li C, Landry T, et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 670-6.PubMedCrossRef Lee L, Li C, Landry T, et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 670-6.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 1094-105.PubMedCrossRef Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 1094-105.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Bruce B, Fries JF, Ware JE Jr. The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 516-26.PubMedCrossRef Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Bruce B, Fries JF, Ware JE Jr. The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 516-26.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Developement to Support Labeling Claims. December 2009. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf (accessed July 2014). U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Developement to Support Labeling Claims. December 2009. Available from URL: http://​www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​Drugs/​Guidances/​UCM193282.​pdf (accessed July 2014).
53.
go back to reference Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. Value Health 2009; 12: 1075-83.PubMedCrossRef Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report. Value Health 2009; 12: 1075-83.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924-34. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924-34.
55.
go back to reference Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1497-504.PubMedCrossRef Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1497-504.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy AD, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1354-62.PubMedCrossRef Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy AD, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1354-62.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, Li JS. Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010; 34: 313-21.PubMedCrossRef Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, Li JS. Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010; 34: 313-21.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 446-53. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 446-53.
59.
go back to reference Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, Jespersen TW, Hessov I. Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 2002; 18: 147-52.PubMedCrossRef Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, Jespersen TW, Hessov I. Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 2002; 18: 147-52.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Basse L, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H. Convalescence after colonic resection with fast-track versus conventional care. Scand J Surg 2004; 93: 24-8. Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Basse L, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H. Convalescence after colonic resection with fast-track versus conventional care. Scand J Surg 2004; 93: 24-8.
61.
go back to reference Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Andreasen J, Kehlet H. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 683-7.PubMedCrossRef Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Andreasen J, Kehlet H. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 683-7.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Muller JM, Schwenk W. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1463-8.PubMedCrossRef Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Muller JM, Schwenk W. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1463-8.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 1-7.PubMedCrossRef Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 1-7.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference van Bree SH, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW, et al. Identification of clinical outcome measures for recovery of gastrointestinal motility in postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 708-14.PubMedCrossRef van Bree SH, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW, et al. Identification of clinical outcome measures for recovery of gastrointestinal motility in postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 708-14.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
What outcomes are important in the assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways?
Authors
Liane S. Feldman, MD
Lawrence Lee, MD
Julio Fiore Jr, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0263-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 2/2015 Go to the issue