Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Reports of Original Investigations

Reproducibility of current perception threshold with the Neurometer® vs the Stimpod NMS450 peripheral nerve stimulator in healthy volunteers: an observational study

Authors: Ban C. H. Tsui, MD, Timothy J. Shakespeare, MBBS, Danika H. Leung, Jeremy H. Tsui, Gareth N. Corry, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Current methods of assessing nerve blocks, such as loss of perception to cold sensation, are subjective at best. Transcutaneous nerve stimulation is an alternative method that has previously been used to measure the current perception threshold (CPT) in individuals with neuropathic conditions, and various devices to measure CPT are commercially available. Nevertheless, the device must provide reproducible results to be used as an objective tool for assessing nerve blocks.

Methods

We recruited ten healthy volunteers to examine CPT reproducibility using the Neurometer® and the Stimpod NMS450 peripheral nerve stimulator. Each subject’s CPT was determined for the median (second digit) and ulnar (fifth digit) nerve sensory distributions on both hands – with the Neurometer at 5 Hz, 250 Hz, and 2000 Hz and with the Stimpod at pulse widths of 0.1 msec, 0.3 msec, 0.5 msec, and 1.0 msec, both at 5 Hz and 2 Hz. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were also calculated to assess reproducibility; acceptable ICCs were defined as ≥ 0.4.

Results

The ICC values for the Stimpod ranged from 0.425-0.79, depending on pulse width, digit, and stimulation; ICCs for the Neurometer were 0.615 and 0.735 at 250 and 2,000 Hz, respectively. These values were considered acceptable; however, the Neurometer performed less efficiently at 5 Hz (ICCs for the second and fifth digits were 0.292 and 0.318, respectively).

Conclusion

Overall, the Stimpod device displayed good to excellent reproducibility in measuring CPT in healthy volunteers. The Neurometer displayed poor reproducibility at low frequency (5 Hz). These results suggest that peripheral nerve stimulators may be potential devices for measuring CPT to assess nerve blocks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheng WY, Jiang YD, Chuang LM, et al. Quantitative sensory testing and risk factors of diabetic sensory neuropathy. J Neurol 1999; 246: 394-8.PubMedCrossRef Cheng WY, Jiang YD, Chuang LM, et al. Quantitative sensory testing and risk factors of diabetic sensory neuropathy. J Neurol 1999; 246: 394-8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Ng LK, Rendell M, Bleecker ML. New screening device for assessment of peripheral neuropathy. J Occup Med 1986; 28: 1219-21.PubMed Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Ng LK, Rendell M, Bleecker ML. New screening device for assessment of peripheral neuropathy. J Occup Med 1986; 28: 1219-21.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Masson EA, Veves A, Fernando D, Boulton AJ. Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 724-8.PubMedCrossRef Masson EA, Veves A, Fernando D, Boulton AJ. Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 724-8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Masson EA, Boulton AJ. The Neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991; 8 Spec No: S63-6. Masson EA, Boulton AJ. The Neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991; 8 Spec No: S63-6.
5.
go back to reference Matsutomo R, Takebayashi K, Aso Y. Assessment of peripheral neuropathy using measurement of the current perception threshold with the neurometer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 442-53.PubMedCrossRef Matsutomo R, Takebayashi K, Aso Y. Assessment of peripheral neuropathy using measurement of the current perception threshold with the neurometer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 442-53.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nather A, Neo SH, Chionh SB, Liew SC, Sim EY, Chew JL. Assessment of sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients without diabetic foot problems. J. Diabetes Complications 2008; 22: 126-31.PubMedCrossRef Nather A, Neo SH, Chionh SB, Liew SC, Sim EY, Chew JL. Assessment of sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients without diabetic foot problems. J. Diabetes Complications 2008; 22: 126-31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nather A, Lin WK, Aziz Z, Hj OC, et al. Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems. Diabet Foot Ankle 2011; 2: 6367. DOI:10.3402/dfa.v2i0.6367. Nather A, Lin WK, Aziz Z, Hj OC, et al. Assessment of sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetic foot problems. Diabet Foot Ankle 2011; 2: 6367. DOI:10.​3402/​dfa.​v2i0.​6367.
8.
go back to reference Kanai A, Suzuki A, Okamoto H. Comparison of cutaneous anesthetic effect of 8% lidocaine spray with lidocaine patch using current perception threshold test. Pain Med 2010; 11: 472-5.PubMedCrossRef Kanai A, Suzuki A, Okamoto H. Comparison of cutaneous anesthetic effect of 8% lidocaine spray with lidocaine patch using current perception threshold test. Pain Med 2010; 11: 472-5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liu S, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL. Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nerve block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 60-3.PubMedCrossRef Liu S, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL. Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nerve block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 60-3.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sakai T, Tomiyasu S, Yamada H, Ono T, Sumikawa K. Quantitative and selective evaluation of differential sensory nerve block after transdermal lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 248-51.PubMedCrossRef Sakai T, Tomiyasu S, Yamada H, Ono T, Sumikawa K. Quantitative and selective evaluation of differential sensory nerve block after transdermal lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 248-51.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eichenberger U, Giani C, Petersen-Felix S, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 467-73.PubMedCrossRef Eichenberger U, Giani C, Petersen-Felix S, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Lumbar epidural fentanyl: segmental spread and effect on temporal summation and muscle pain. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 467-73.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Urmey WF, Grossi P. Percutaneous electrode guidance: a noninvasive technique for prelocation of peripheral nerves to facilitate peripheral plexus or nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 261-7.PubMed Urmey WF, Grossi P. Percutaneous electrode guidance: a noninvasive technique for prelocation of peripheral nerves to facilitate peripheral plexus or nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 261-7.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. NY: Wiley; 1986. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. NY: Wiley; 1986.
14.
go back to reference Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17: 101-10.PubMedCrossRef Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17: 101-10.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Testing reproducibility. In: Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TF, Cleophas EP, editors. Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. 4th ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.; 2009. p. 385-95.CrossRef Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Testing reproducibility. In: Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TF, Cleophas EP, editors. Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. 4th ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.; 2009. p. 385-95.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barkai L, Kempler P, Vamosi I, Lukacs K, Marton A, Keresztes K. Peripheral sensory nerve dysfunction in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 228-33.PubMedCrossRef Barkai L, Kempler P, Vamosi I, Lukacs K, Marton A, Keresztes K. Peripheral sensory nerve dysfunction in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 228-33.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Katims JJ, Rouvelas P, Sadler BT, Weseley SA. Current perception threshold. Reproducibility and comparison with nerve conduction in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. ASAIO Trans 1989; 35: 280-4.PubMedCrossRef Katims JJ, Rouvelas P, Sadler BT, Weseley SA. Current perception threshold. Reproducibility and comparison with nerve conduction in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. ASAIO Trans 1989; 35: 280-4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Takekuma K, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H. Age and gender differences in skin sensory threshold assessed by current perception in community-dwelling Japanese. J Epidemiol 2000; 10: S33-8.PubMedCrossRef Takekuma K, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H. Age and gender differences in skin sensory threshold assessed by current perception in community-dwelling Japanese. J Epidemiol 2000; 10: S33-8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Finkel JC, Yang CI, Yarvitz JL, Patel KM. Neuroselective sensory electrodiagnostic evaluation of 4% liposomal topical lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1259-62.PubMedCrossRef Finkel JC, Yang CI, Yarvitz JL, Patel KM. Neuroselective sensory electrodiagnostic evaluation of 4% liposomal topical lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1259-62.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sakura S, Sumi M, Yamada Y, Saito Y, Kosaka Y. Quantitative and selective assessment of sensory block during lumbar epidural anaesthesia with 1% or 2% lidocaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 718-22.PubMedCrossRef Sakura S, Sumi M, Yamada Y, Saito Y, Kosaka Y. Quantitative and selective assessment of sensory block during lumbar epidural anaesthesia with 1% or 2% lidocaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 718-22.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tack CJ, Netten PM, Scheepers MH, Meijer JW, Smits P, Lutterman J. Comparison of clinical examination, current and vibratory perception threshold in diabetic polyneuropathy. Neth J Med 1994; 44: 41-9.PubMed Tack CJ, Netten PM, Scheepers MH, Meijer JW, Smits P, Lutterman J. Comparison of clinical examination, current and vibratory perception threshold in diabetic polyneuropathy. Neth J Med 1994; 44: 41-9.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Anonymous. Technology review: the Neurometer Current Perception Threshold (CPT). AAEM Equipment and Computer Committee. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22:523-31. Anonymous. Technology review: the Neurometer Current Perception Threshold (CPT). AAEM Equipment and Computer Committee. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22:523-31.
23.
go back to reference Pither CE, Raj PP, Ford DJ. The use of peripheral nerve stimulators for regional anaesthesia: a review of experimental characteristics, technique, and clinical applications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1985; 10: 49-58. Pither CE, Raj PP, Ford DJ. The use of peripheral nerve stimulators for regional anaesthesia: a review of experimental characteristics, technique, and clinical applications. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1985; 10: 49-58.
24.
go back to reference Kiernan MC, Lin CS, Andersen KV, Murray NM, Bostock H. Clinical evaluation of excitability measures in sensory nerve. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 883-92.PubMedCrossRef Kiernan MC, Lin CS, Andersen KV, Murray NM, Bostock H. Clinical evaluation of excitability measures in sensory nerve. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 883-92.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Claudio RE, Hadzic N, Thys DM, Santos AC. Electrical nerve localization: effects of cutaneous electrode placement and duration of the stimulus on motor response. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1526-30.PubMedCrossRef Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Claudio RE, Hadzic N, Thys DM, Santos AC. Electrical nerve localization: effects of cutaneous electrode placement and duration of the stimulus on motor response. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1526-30.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shimoda O, Ikuta Y. The current perception thresholds vary between horizontal and 70 degrees tilt-up positions. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 398-402.PubMed Shimoda O, Ikuta Y. The current perception thresholds vary between horizontal and 70 degrees tilt-up positions. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 398-402.PubMed
27.
Metadata
Title
Reproducibility of current perception threshold with the Neurometer® vs the Stimpod NMS450 peripheral nerve stimulator in healthy volunteers: an observational study
Authors
Ban C. H. Tsui, MD
Timothy J. Shakespeare, MBBS
Danika H. Leung
Jeremy H. Tsui
Gareth N. Corry, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-9965-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2013 Go to the issue