Published in:
01-01-2010 | Reports of Original Investigations
Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolongs bupivacaine spinal anesthesia
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 1/2010
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
Midazolam has only sedative properties. However, dexmedetomidine has both analgesic and sedative properties that may prolong the duration of sensory and motor block obtained with spinal anesthesia. This study was designed to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine with midazolam and placebo on spinal block duration, analgesia, and sedation in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.
Methods
In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 75 American Society of Anesthesiologists’ I and II patients received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg · kg−1, midazolam 0.05 mg · kg−1, or saline intravenously before spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% 15 mg (n = 25 per group). The maximum upper level of sensory block and sensory and motor regression times were recorded. Postoperative analgesic requirements and sedation were also recorded.
Results
Sensory block was higher with dexmedetomidine (T 4.6 ± 0.6) than with midazolam (T 6.4 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) or saline (T 6.4 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). Time for sensory regression of two dermatomes was 145 ± 26 min in the dexmedetomidine group, longer (P < 0.001) than in the midazolam (106 ± 39 min) or the saline (97 ± 27 min) groups. Duration of motor block was similar in all groups. Dexmedetomidine also increased the time to first request for postoperative analgesia (P < 0.01 compared with midazolam and saline) and decreased analgesic requirements (P < 0.05). The maximum Ramsay sedation score was greater in the dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups than in the saline group (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Intravenous dexmedetomidine, but not midazolam, prolonged spinal bupivacaine sensory blockade. It also provided sedation and additional analgesia.