Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Anatomical Science International 4/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Evaluation of coccygeal bone variability, intercoccygeal and lumbo-sacral angles in asymptomatic patients in multislice computed tomography

Authors: Piotr Przybylski, Marcin Pankowicz, Agata Boćkowska, Elżbieta Czekajska-Chehab, Grzegorz Staśkiewicz, Maria Korzec, Andrzej Drop

Published in: Anatomical Science International | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The coccyx is a highly variable structure in the human caudal spine. Previous studies have revealed a significant correlation between coccyx shape and the pain syndrome coccygodynia. The aim of this study was to carry out a complex morphological evaluation of the coccyx in a group of asymptomatic patients of different sex and age examined by multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of the pelvis for different clinical reasons. MSCT pelvis examinations from various nontraumatic clinical conditions from consecutive adult patients (250 males and 250 females of comparable age, mean 54.9 ± 14.8 years) were used. Based on middle sagittal plane reconstructions: coccyx configuration (types I–IV according to Postacchini and Massobrio classification, each successive type characterized by a more pronounced anterior position of coccyx), number of segments, length and angles (intercoccygeal and lumbo-sacral) were measured. The results obtained were analyzed statistically. The following types of coccyx were observed in the study group: type I in 16.2 %, type II 40.0 %, type III 32.4 %, and type IV 11.4 % cases. In most cases (50.8 %), three segments were noted. Lumbo-sacral angle varied from 15.6° to 66.4° (average 41.6° ± 7.7°), and intercoccygeal angle from 0° to 107° (average 51° ± 23.3°). A significant negative correlation between age and number of segments as well as age and intercoccygeal angle was observed. In males, the coccyx was significantly longer, while in females the intercoccygeal angle was significantly wider. Type I was significantly more frequent in males, while type IV was found more often in females. The results obtained differ from other results in the literature. Our research could be useful to determine population standards, and help (together with clinical history) future studies of associations between idiopathic coccygodynia and coccyx morphology.
Literature
go back to reference Cheng S et al (2011) Coccygectomy for stubborn coccydynia. Chin J Traumatol 14(1):25–28PubMed Cheng S et al (2011) Coccygectomy for stubborn coccydynia. Chin J Traumatol 14(1):25–28PubMed
go back to reference Chuerie AG et al (2002) Cocciogodinia: tratamento cirurgico. Acta Ortop Bras 10(4):26–30CrossRef Chuerie AG et al (2002) Cocciogodinia: tratamento cirurgico. Acta Ortop Bras 10(4):26–30CrossRef
go back to reference Datir A, Connell D (2010) CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia. Clin Radiol 65(1):21–25PubMedCrossRef Datir A, Connell D (2010) CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia. Clin Radiol 65(1):21–25PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Feldbrin Z et al (2005) Coccygectomy for intractable coccygodynia. IMAJ 7:160–162PubMed Feldbrin Z et al (2005) Coccygectomy for intractable coccygodynia. IMAJ 7:160–162PubMed
go back to reference Ferguson AB (1934) Clinical and roentgen interpretation of lumbosacral spine. Radiology 22:548–558 Ferguson AB (1934) Clinical and roentgen interpretation of lumbosacral spine. Radiology 22:548–558
go back to reference Fogel RG et al (2004) Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:49–54PubMed Fogel RG et al (2004) Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:49–54PubMed
go back to reference Kerimoglu U et al (2007) Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients. Surg Radiol Anat 29:683–687PubMedCrossRef Kerimoglu U et al (2007) Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients. Surg Radiol Anat 29:683–687PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kim NH, Suk KS (1999) Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. Yonsei Med J 40:215–220PubMed Kim NH, Suk KS (1999) Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. Yonsei Med J 40:215–220PubMed
go back to reference Magine JY, Doursounian L et al (2000) Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine 25(23):3072–3079CrossRef Magine JY, Doursounian L et al (2000) Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine 25(23):3072–3079CrossRef
go back to reference Maigne JY, Lagauche D et al. (2000) Instability of the coccyx in coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1038–1041 Maigne JY, Lagauche D et al. (2000) Instability of the coccyx in coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:1038–1041
go back to reference Maigne JY, Tamalet B (1996) Standardized radiologic protocol for the study of common coccygodynia and characteristics of the lesions observed in the sitting position. Clinical elements differentiating luxation, hypermobility, and normal mobility. Spine 21:2588–2593PubMedCrossRef Maigne JY, Tamalet B (1996) Standardized radiologic protocol for the study of common coccygodynia and characteristics of the lesions observed in the sitting position. Clinical elements differentiating luxation, hypermobility, and normal mobility. Spine 21:2588–2593PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Patel R et al (2008) Coccydynia. Cerr Rev Musculoskelet Med 3–4:223–226CrossRef Patel R et al (2008) Coccydynia. Cerr Rev Musculoskelet Med 3–4:223–226CrossRef
go back to reference Postacchini F, Massobrio M (1983) Idiopathic coccygodynia: analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1116–1124PubMed Postacchini F, Massobrio M (1983) Idiopathic coccygodynia: analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1116–1124PubMed
go back to reference Richards HJ (1954) Causes of coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 36:142–144 Richards HJ (1954) Causes of coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 36:142–144
go back to reference Stern FH (1967) Coccygodynia among the geriatric population. J Am Geriat Soc 15:100–102PubMed Stern FH (1967) Coccygodynia among the geriatric population. J Am Geriat Soc 15:100–102PubMed
go back to reference Wray C et al (1991) Coccydynia aetiology and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:335–338 Wray C et al (1991) Coccydynia aetiology and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:335–338
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of coccygeal bone variability, intercoccygeal and lumbo-sacral angles in asymptomatic patients in multislice computed tomography
Authors
Piotr Przybylski
Marcin Pankowicz
Agata Boćkowska
Elżbieta Czekajska-Chehab
Grzegorz Staśkiewicz
Maria Korzec
Andrzej Drop
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Anatomical Science International / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1447-6959
Electronic ISSN: 1447-073X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-013-0181-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Anatomical Science International 4/2013 Go to the issue