Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine
Published in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 2/2015

01-06-2015 | original article

Influence of implantation side on the integration of dental implants

A study on miniature pigs

Authors: Mariano López-García, DVM, PhD, Antonio González-Cantalapiedra, DVM, PhD, Mónica López-Peña, DVM, PhD, Fidel San Román, MD, DVM, PhD, Ulf Thams, MD, PhD, Fernando M. Muñoz Guzón

Published in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The present work aimed to describe the incidental findings in a study of immediate loading of dental implants in pigs, i.e., the correlation between implant integration and the side of implantation.

Methods

In 11 adult miniature pigs, maxillary and mandibular premolars and the first molar were bilaterally extracted. A total of 100 dental implants with different surface characteristics were evaluated in the first stage. In the second stage, the two types of implants that yielded the best results were tested under loading conditions for 6 months. Statistical analysis included a one-way analysis of variance and a Holm–Sidak test.

Results

Histometric results showed significant differences in the bone-to-implant contact depending on the side of implantation. Higher rates of contact were found for implants placed in the left side; this was not related to the type of implant used.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the side of implantation is important in dental implant research, at least in miniature pigs. We recommend that for each surgical procedure notes should be made about the side first operated on and whether the dentist was right- or left-handed. Moreover, special attention should be paid to objects placed in the animal pens so as to avoid the development of inappropriate behaviors in animals.
Literature
1.
2.
Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:527–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721–64.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Uribe R, Peñarrocha M, Balaguer J, Fulgueiras N. Immediate loading in oral implants. Present situation. Med Oral Patol Oral. 2005;10(Suppl 2):E143–53.
5.
Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2005;20:569–77.
6.
Kronström M, Svenson B, Hellman M, Persson R. Early implant failures in patiens treated with Brånemark system titanium dental implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2001;16:201–7.
7.
Karoussis IK, Brägger U, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2004;15:8–17.CrossRef
8.
Duyck J, Naert I. Failure of oral implants: aetiology, symptoms and influencing factors. Clin Oral Invest. 1998;2:102–14.CrossRef
9.
Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implants failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:610–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Molly L, Jacobs R. Impact of systemic diseases and medication on osseintegration. Periodontol 2000. 2003;33:163–71.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Tolstunov L. Implants zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implant. 2007;33:211–20.CrossRef
12.
13.
Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2002;13:617–22.CrossRef
14.
Chung DM, Oh T, Lee J, Misch CE, Wang H. Factors affecting late implant bone loss: a retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2007;22:117–26.
15.
Balshi TJ, Lee HY, Hernandez RE. The use of pterygomaxillary implants in the partially edentulous patient: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Max Impl. 1995;18:89–98.
16.
Aparicio C, Padrós A, Gil FJ. In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1672–82.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Gil FJ, Manzanares N, Badet A, Aparicio C, Ginebra MP. Biomimetic treatment on dental implants for short-term bone regeneration. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18:59–66.CrossRef
18.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Plos Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:721–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Aparicio C, Gil FJ, Thams U, Munoz F, Padros A, Planell JA. Osseointegration of grit-blasted and bioactive titanium implants: histomorphometry in minipigs. Key Eng Mat. 2004;254–2:737–40.CrossRef
21.
Aparicio C, Manero JM, Conde F, Pegueroles M, Planell JA, Vallet-Regí M, et al. Acceleration of apatite nucleation on microrough bioactive titanium for bone-replacing implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2007;82A:521–9.CrossRef
22.
Nkenke E, Lehner B, Weinzierl K, Thams U, Neugebauer J, Steveling H, et al. Bone contact, growth, and density around immediately loaded implants in the mandible of mini pigs. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2003;14:312–21.CrossRef
23.
Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. J Oral Path. 1982;11:318–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hale TM, Boretsky BB, Scheidt MJ, McQuade MJ, Strong SL. Evaluation of titanium dental implant osseointegration in edentulous areas of micro swine. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:118–24.PubMed
25.
Canakci V, Tan U, Orbak R, Tezel A. Right- and left-handed dentists in periodontal therapy. Int J Neurosci. 2002;112:1–14.PubMed
26.
Orbak R, Tezel A, Canakci V, Tan U. Right- and left-handed dentist using right- and left-sided dental chairs in treatment of calculus. Int J Neurosci. 2002;112:15–30.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Park H, Jeong S, Kwon O. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2006;130:18–25.CrossRef
28.
29.
Huang X, Zhang G, Herring SW. Effects of oral sensory afferents on mastication in the miniature pig. J Dent Res. 1993;72:980–6.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Herring SW, Rafferty KL, Liu ZJ, Marshall CD. Jaws muscles and the skull in mammals: the biomechanics of mastication. Comp Biochem Phys A. 2001;131:207–19.CrossRef
31.
Zhang F, Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG, Herring SW. Mass properties of the pig mandible. J Dent Res. 2001;80:327–35.
32.
Liu Z, Herring SW. Masticatory strains on osseous and ligamentous components of temporomandibular joint in miniature pigs. J Orofac Pain. 2000;14:265–78.PubMed
33.
Sun Z, Liu Z, Herring, SW. Movement of temporomandibular joint tissues during mastication and passive manipulation in miniature pigs. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47:293–305.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Herring SW, Scapino RP. Physiology of feeding in miniature pigs. J Morphol. 2005;141:427–60.CrossRef
35.
Liu ZJ, Gree JR, Moore CA, Herring SW. Time series analysis of jaw muscle contraction and tissue deformation during mastication in miniature pigs. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:7–17.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Herring SW. Mastication and maturity: a longitudinal study in pigs. J Dent Res. 1997;56:1377–82.CrossRef
37.
Dailey JW, McGlone JJ. Oral/nasal/facial and other behaviors of sows kept individually outdoors on pasture, soil or indoors in gestation crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1997;52:25–43.CrossRef
38.
Lawrence AB, Terlouw EM. A review of behavioural factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:2815–25.PubMed
39.
Larsson E, Øgaard B, Lindsten R, Holmgren N, Brattberg M, Brattberg L. Craniofacial and dentofacial development in pigs fed soft and hard diets. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2005;128:731–9.CrossRef
40.
Olsen ML, Aaboe M, Hjørting-Hansen E, Hansen AK. Problems related to an intraoral approach for experimental surgery on minipigs. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2004;15:333–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of implantation side on the integration of dental implants
A study on miniature pigs
Authors
Mariano López-García, DVM, PhD
Antonio González-Cantalapiedra, DVM, PhD
Mónica López-Peña, DVM, PhD
Fidel San Román, MD, DVM, PhD
Ulf Thams, MD, PhD
Fernando M. Muñoz Guzón
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1867-2221
Electronic ISSN: 1867-223X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-015-0126-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 2/2015 Go to the issue

Retraction Note

Retraction Note: Aeronautic dentistry: an upcoming branch

review article

Twin-mix anesthesia as pterygomandibular nerve block for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars

original article

Gender aspects in oral health-related quality of life of oral lichen planus patients

case study

Case report of an unusual evolution of peripheral ossifying fibroma