Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 9/2016

Open Access 01-09-2016 | Original Article

Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience

Authors: M. Abawi, F. Nijhoff, P.R. Stella, M. Voskuil, D. Benedetto, P.A. Doevendans, P. Agostoni

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation.

Results

Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ± 8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8–14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %): 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation).

Conclusion

In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Williams B, Menon M, Satran D, et al. Patients with coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization: prevalence and 3‑year mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:886–91.PubMed Williams B, Menon M, Satran D, et al. Patients with coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization: prevalence and 3‑year mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:886–91.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC joint study group on the treatment of refractory angina. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:355–70.CrossRefPubMed Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC joint study group on the treatment of refractory angina. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:355–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bhatt AB, Stone PH. Current strategies for the prevention of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21:492–502.CrossRefPubMed Bhatt AB, Stone PH. Current strategies for the prevention of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21:492–502.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chow CM, Donovan L, Johansen H. Regional variation in self-reported heart disease prevalence in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21:1265–71.PubMed Chow CM, Donovan L, Johansen H. Regional variation in self-reported heart disease prevalence in Canada. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21:1265–71.PubMed
5.
go back to reference McGillion M, Arthur HM, Cook A, et al. Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(2 Suppl):20–41.CrossRef McGillion M, Arthur HM, Cook A, et al. Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(2 Suppl):20–41.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leon MB, Kornowski R, Downey WE, et al. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1812–9.CrossRefPubMed Leon MB, Kornowski R, Downey WE, et al. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1812–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Henry TD, Satran D, Jolicoeur EM. Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:78–95.CrossRefPubMed Henry TD, Satran D, Jolicoeur EM. Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:78–95.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1048–53.CrossRefPubMed McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1048–53.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Weisz G, Généreux P, Iñiguez A, et al. Ranolazine in patients with incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention (RIVER-PCI): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:9–15.CrossRef Weisz G, Généreux P, Iñiguez A, et al. Ranolazine in patients with incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention (RIVER-PCI): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:9–15.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sato M, Saito T, Mitsugi M, et al. Effects of cardiac contraction and coronary sinus pressure elevation on collateral circulation. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(4 Pt 2):H1433–H1440.PubMed Sato M, Saito T, Mitsugi M, et al. Effects of cardiac contraction and coronary sinus pressure elevation on collateral circulation. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(4 Pt 2):H1433–H1440.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ido A, Hasebe N, Matsuhashi H, Kikuchi K. Coronary sinus occlusion enhances coronary collateral flow and reduces subendocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H1361–H1367.PubMed Ido A, Hasebe N, Matsuhashi H, Kikuchi K. Coronary sinus occlusion enhances coronary collateral flow and reduces subendocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H1361–H1367.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rouleau JR, White M. Effects of coronary sinus pressure elevation on coronary blood flow distribution in dogs with normal preload. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985;63:787–97.CrossRefPubMed Rouleau JR, White M. Effects of coronary sinus pressure elevation on coronary blood flow distribution in dogs with normal preload. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985;63:787–97.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Banai S, Muvhar BS, Parikh KH, et al. Coronary sinus reducer stent for the treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, safety feasibility first-in-man study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1783–9.CrossRefPubMed Banai S, Muvhar BS, Parikh KH, et al. Coronary sinus reducer stent for the treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, safety feasibility first-in-man study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1783–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gross L, Blum L, Silverman G. Experimental attempts to increase the blood supply to the dog’s heart by means of coronary sinus occlusion. J Exp Med. 1937;65:91–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gross L, Blum L, Silverman G. Experimental attempts to increase the blood supply to the dog’s heart by means of coronary sinus occlusion. J Exp Med. 1937;65:91–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Beck CS, Leighninger DS. Operations for coronary artery disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1954;156:1226–33.CrossRefPubMed Beck CS, Leighninger DS. Operations for coronary artery disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1954;156:1226–33.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Konigstein M, Meyten N, Verheye S, Schwartz M, Banai S. Transcatheter treatment for refractory angina with the coronary sinus reducer. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1158–64.CrossRefPubMed Konigstein M, Meyten N, Verheye S, Schwartz M, Banai S. Transcatheter treatment for refractory angina with the coronary sinus reducer. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1158–64.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Banai S, Schwartz M, Sievert H, et al. Long term follow-up to evaluate the safety of the neovasc reducer A device-based therapy for chronic refractory angina. annual scientific session of the american college of cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;(A98):E927–A980. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(10)60928-X. Banai S, Schwartz M, Sievert H, et al. Long term follow-up to evaluate the safety of the neovasc reducer A device-based therapy for chronic refractory angina. annual scientific session of the american college of cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;(A98):E927–A980. doi:10.​1016/​S0735-1097(10)60928-X.
18.
go back to reference Verheye S, Jolicœur EM, Behan MW, et al. Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:519–27.CrossRefPubMed Verheye S, Jolicœur EM, Behan MW, et al. Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:519–27.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jolicœur EM, Banai S, Henry TD, et al. A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jolicœur EM, Banai S, Henry TD, et al. A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Stoller M, Traupe T, Khattab AA, et al. Effects of coronary sinus occlusion on myocardial ischaemia in humans: role of coronary collateral function. Heart. 2013;99:548–55.CrossRefPubMed Stoller M, Traupe T, Khattab AA, et al. Effects of coronary sinus occlusion on myocardial ischaemia in humans: role of coronary collateral function. Heart. 2013;99:548–55.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Hahn RS, Kim M. Revascularization of the heart; histologic changes after arterialization of the coronary sinus. Circulation. 1952;5:810–5.CrossRefPubMed Hahn RS, Kim M. Revascularization of the heart; histologic changes after arterialization of the coronary sinus. Circulation. 1952;5:810–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hoef TP van de, Nijveldt R, Ent M van der, et al. Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the prepare RAMSES safety and feasibility study. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:37–44.CrossRefPubMed Hoef TP van de, Nijveldt R, Ent M van der, et al. Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the prepare RAMSES safety and feasibility study. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:37–44.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mohl W, Gangl C, Jusić A, et al. PICSO: from myocardial salvage to tissue regeneration. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:36–46.CrossRefPubMed Mohl W, Gangl C, Jusić A, et al. PICSO: from myocardial salvage to tissue regeneration. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:36–46.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ansari A. Anatomy and clinical significance of ventricular thebesian veins. Clin Anat. 2001;14:102–10.CrossRefPubMed Ansari A. Anatomy and clinical significance of ventricular thebesian veins. Clin Anat. 2001;14:102–10.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ghani A, Delnoy PP, Ramdat MAR, et al. Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation. Neth Heart J. 2014;22:286–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ghani A, Delnoy PP, Ramdat MAR, et al. Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation. Neth Heart J. 2014;22:286–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience
Authors
M. Abawi
F. Nijhoff
P.R. Stella
M. Voskuil
D. Benedetto
P.A. Doevendans
P. Agostoni
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0862-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Netherlands Heart Journal 9/2016 Go to the issue

Rhythm Puzzle Question

Positive exercise test?

Rhythm Puzzle Answer

Positive exercise test?