Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Article

The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients

Authors: Paul K. R. Dasari, PhD, Judson P. Jones, PhD, Michael E. Casey, PhD, Yuanyuan Liang, PhD, Vasken Dilsizian, MD, Mark F. Smith, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The effect of time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) modeling in image reconstruction has not been well studied for cardiac PET. This study assesses their separate and combined influence on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients.

Methods

Thirty-six obese patients underwent rest-stress 82Rb cardiac PET. Images were reconstructed with and without TOF and PSF modeling. Perfusion was quantitatively compared using the AHA 17-segment model for patients grouped by BMI, cross-sectional body area in the scanner field of view, gender, and left ventricular myocardial volume. Summed rest scores (SRS), summed stress scores (SSS), and summed difference scores (SDS) were compared.

Results

TOF improved polar map visual uniformity and increased septal wall perfusion by up to 10%. This increase was greater for larger patients, more evident for patients grouped by cross-sectional area than by BMI, and more prominent for females. PSF modeling increased perfusion by about 1.5% in all cardiac segments. TOF modeling generally decreased SRS and SSS with significant decreases between 2.4 and 3.0 (P < .05), which could affect risk stratification; SDS remained about the same. With PSF modeling, SRS, SSS, and SDS were largely unchanged.

Conclusion

TOF and PSF modeling affect regional and global perfusion, SRS, and SSS. Clinicians should consider these effects and gender-dependent differences when interpreting 82Rb perfusion studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24–33.CrossRefPubMed Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Friedman JD, Case JA, Bryngelson JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24–33.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Flotats A, Bravo PE, Fukushima K, Chaudhry MA, Merrill J, Bengel FM. 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to 99mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2012;39:1233–9.CrossRef Flotats A, Bravo PE, Fukushima K, Chaudhry MA, Merrill J, Bengel FM. 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to 99mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2012;39:1233–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052–8.CrossRefPubMed Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Freedman N, Schechter D, Klein M, Marciano R, Rozenman Y, Chisin R. SPECT attenuation artifacts in normal and overweight persons: Insights from a retrospective comparison of Rb-82 positron emission tomography and Tl-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:1019–23.CrossRefPubMed Freedman N, Schechter D, Klein M, Marciano R, Rozenman Y, Chisin R. SPECT attenuation artifacts in normal and overweight persons: Insights from a retrospective comparison of Rb-82 positron emission tomography and Tl-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:1019–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1828–37.CrossRefPubMed Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1828–37.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chow BJW, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Merhige ME, Williams BA, Veledar E, et al. Prognostic value of PET myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7:278–87.CrossRef Chow BJW, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Merhige ME, Williams BA, Veledar E, et al. Prognostic value of PET myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7:278–87.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Muehllehner G. Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: Experimental and clinical results. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:462–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Muehllehner G. Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: Experimental and clinical results. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:462–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Conti M. Focus on time-of-flight PET: The benefits of improved time resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2011;38:1147–57.CrossRef Conti M. Focus on time-of-flight PET: The benefits of improved time resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol I. 2011;38:1147–57.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight Information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight Information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Taniguchi T, Akamatsu G, Kasahara Y, Mitsumoto K, Baba S, Tsutsui Y, et al. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29:71–7.CrossRefPubMed Taniguchi T, Akamatsu G, Kasahara Y, Mitsumoto K, Baba S, Tsutsui Y, et al. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29:71–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Daube-Witherspoon ME, Surti S, Perkins AE, Karp JS. Determination of accuracy and precision of lesion uptake measurements in human subjects with time-of-flight PET. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:602–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daube-Witherspoon ME, Surti S, Perkins AE, Karp JS. Determination of accuracy and precision of lesion uptake measurements in human subjects with time-of-flight PET. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:602–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Conti M. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:155–68.CrossRefPubMed Conti M. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:155–68.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Turkington TG, Wilson JM. Attenuation artifacts and time-of-flight PET. 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vols 1-5. 2009:2997-9. Turkington TG, Wilson JM. Attenuation artifacts and time-of-flight PET. 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vols 1-5. 2009:2997-9.
15.
go back to reference Bai C, Andreyev A, Hu Z, Maniawski P, Zhang J, Knopp M. TOF reconstruction for improved quantitative accuracy in PET/CT studies with misalignment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:478. Bai C, Andreyev A, Hu Z, Maniawski P, Zhang J, Knopp M. TOF reconstruction for improved quantitative accuracy in PET/CT studies with misalignment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:478.
16.
go back to reference Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25:907–21.CrossRefPubMed Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25:907–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Walker MD, Asselin MC, Julyan PJ, Feldmann M, Talbot PS, Jones T, et al. Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: Benefits of a resolution model. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:931.CrossRefPubMed Walker MD, Asselin MC, Julyan PJ, Feldmann M, Talbot PS, Jones T, et al. Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: Benefits of a resolution model. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:931.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: An experimental evaluation. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: An experimental evaluation. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Tong S, Alessio AM, Thielemans K, Stearns C, Ross S, Kinahan PE. Properties and mitigation of edge artifacts in PSF-based PET reconstruction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2011;58:2264–75.CrossRef Tong S, Alessio AM, Thielemans K, Stearns C, Ross S, Kinahan PE. Properties and mitigation of edge artifacts in PSF-based PET reconstruction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2011;58:2264–75.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Le Meunier L, Slomka PJ, Dey D, Ramesh A, Thomson LEJ, Hayes SW, et al. Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:414–26.CrossRefPubMed Le Meunier L, Slomka PJ, Dey D, Ramesh A, Thomson LEJ, Hayes SW, et al. Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:414–26.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Armstrong IS, Tonge CM, Arumugam P. Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:467–74.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong IS, Tonge CM, Arumugam P. Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:467–74.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference DiFilippo FP, Brunken RC. Impact of time-of-flight reconstruction on cardiac PET images of obese patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e103–8.CrossRefPubMed DiFilippo FP, Brunken RC. Impact of time-of-flight reconstruction on cardiac PET images of obese patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e103–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tipnis S, Hu Z, Gagnon D, O’ Donnell J. Time-of-flight PET for Rb-82 cardiac perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:74P. Tipnis S, Hu Z, Gagnon D, O’ Donnell J. Time-of-flight PET for Rb-82 cardiac perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:74P.
25.
go back to reference Oldan JD, Shah SN, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, Obuchowski NA, Bolen MA. Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information? J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1102–9.CrossRefPubMed Oldan JD, Shah SN, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, Obuchowski NA, Bolen MA. Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information? J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1102–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Armstrong IS, Tonge CM, Arumugam P. Assessing time-of-flight signal-to-noise ratio gains within the myocardium and subsequent reductions in administered activity in cardiac PET studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2017. Armstrong IS, Tonge CM, Arumugam P. Assessing time-of-flight signal-to-noise ratio gains within the myocardium and subsequent reductions in administered activity in cardiac PET studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2017.
27.
go back to reference Wells RG, deKemp RA. Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart? J Nucl Cardiol 2017. Wells RG, deKemp RA. Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart? J Nucl Cardiol 2017.
28.
go back to reference Budinger TF. Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: Status relative to conventional PET. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:73–8.PubMed Budinger TF. Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: Status relative to conventional PET. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:73–8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Dasari PKR, Jones JP, Casey ME, Smith MF. The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on quantitative cardiac PET of large patients: Phantom studies. IEEE Trans Rad Plasma Med Sci. 2017;1:416–25.CrossRef Dasari PKR, Jones JP, Casey ME, Smith MF. The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on quantitative cardiac PET of large patients: Phantom studies. IEEE Trans Rad Plasma Med Sci. 2017;1:416–25.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jakoby BW, Bercier Y, Conti M, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Townsend DW. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2375–89.CrossRefPubMed Jakoby BW, Bercier Y, Conti M, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Townsend DW. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:2375–89.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tout D, Tonge CM, Muthu S, Arumugam P. Assessment of a protocol for routine simultaneous myocardial blood flow measurement and standard myocardial perfusion imaging with rubidium-82 on a high count rate positron emission tomography system. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:1202–11.CrossRefPubMed Tout D, Tonge CM, Muthu S, Arumugam P. Assessment of a protocol for routine simultaneous myocardial blood flow measurement and standard myocardial perfusion imaging with rubidium-82 on a high count rate positron emission tomography system. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:1202–11.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Watson CC. Extension of single scatter simulation to scatter correction of time-of-flight PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2007;54:1679–86.CrossRef Watson CC. Extension of single scatter simulation to scatter correction of time-of-flight PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2007;54:1679–86.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Esteves FP, Nye JA, Khan A, Folks RD, Halkar RK, Garcia EV, et al. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:247–53.CrossRefPubMed Esteves FP, Nye JA, Khan A, Folks RD, Halkar RK, Garcia EV, et al. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:247–53.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42.CrossRefPubMed Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: The Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:455–65.CrossRefPubMed Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: The Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:455–65.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hachamovitch R, Berman D, Shaw LJ, Germano G, Mieres JH. Risk stratification and patient management. In: Dilsizian V, Narula J, editors. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 247–88.CrossRef Hachamovitch R, Berman D, Shaw LJ, Germano G, Mieres JH. Risk stratification and patient management. In: Dilsizian V, Narula J, editors. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 247–88.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Germano G, Kavanagh P, Waechter P, Areeda J, Van Kriekinge S, Sharir T, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: Technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:712–9.PubMed Germano G, Kavanagh P, Waechter P, Areeda J, Van Kriekinge S, Sharir T, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: Technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:712–9.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Wawrzyniak A, Dilsizian V, Krantz D, Harris K, Smith M, Shankovich A, et al. High concordance between mental stress-induced and adenosine-induced myocardial ischemia assessed using SPECT in heart failure patients: Hemodynamic and biomarker correlates. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1527–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wawrzyniak A, Dilsizian V, Krantz D, Harris K, Smith M, Shankovich A, et al. High concordance between mental stress-induced and adenosine-induced myocardial ischemia assessed using SPECT in heart failure patients: Hemodynamic and biomarker correlates. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1527–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients
Authors
Paul K. R. Dasari, PhD
Judson P. Jones, PhD
Michael E. Casey, PhD
Yuanyuan Liang, PhD
Vasken Dilsizian, MD
Mark F. Smith, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1311-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2018 Go to the issue