Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 3/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Article

Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies in Chinese population with Western normal databases

Authors: Dianfu Li, MD, PhD, Dong Li, MD, Jianlin Feng, MD, Donglan Yuan, CNMT, Kejiang Cao, MD, PhD, Ji Chen, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess diagnostic performance of the current quantification packages using Western normal databases in detecting coronary artery disease in Chinese population.

Methods

Seventy-five patients who underwent rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT and coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled. Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) and Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS) with its standard (QPS-standard) and simplified (QPS-simplified) methods were used to quantify these studies. A preliminary Chinese normal database was created from 80 normal subjects (QPS-simplified-Chinese). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the accuracy of the four normal databases in detecting ≥50% or ≥70% stenosis given by CAG.

Results

The enrolled cohorts had lower body mass index (BMI) and smaller heart size than Western population. The areas under ROC curve of ECTb, QPS-standard, and QPS-simplified were significantly lower than QPS-simplified-Chinese in detecting ≥50% stenosis, but not in detecting ≥70% stenosis. Diagnostic accuracy was much lower in the RCA and LCX territory.

Conclusion

Chinese normal database is needed for accurately applying these quantification methods to Chinese population, especially for detecting moderate defects in regions with relatively greater attenuation impact. An alternative approach could be modification of the existing Western normal databases for low-BMI and/or small-heart subjects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;93:905-14.PubMed Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;93:905-14.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Beller GA. Clinical nuclear cardiology: Detection of coronary artery disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995. Beller GA. Clinical nuclear cardiology: Detection of coronary artery disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995.
3.
go back to reference Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death. Circulation 1998;97:535-43.PubMed Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death. Circulation 1998;97:535-43.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single photon emission computed tomography technetium-99m-sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57-62.CrossRefPubMed Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single photon emission computed tomography technetium-99m-sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57-62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med 1989;30:441-9.PubMed DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med 1989;30:441-9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Corbett JR, Ficaro EP. Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:54-68.CrossRefPubMed Corbett JR, Ficaro EP. Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6:54-68.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m sestabmibi SPECT: Definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1494-502.PubMed Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m sestabmibi SPECT: Definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1494-502.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Eisner RL, Tamas MJ, Cloninger K, et al. Normal SPECT thallium-201 bull’s-eye display: Gender differences. J Nucl Med 1988;29:1901-9.PubMed Eisner RL, Tamas MJ, Cloninger K, et al. Normal SPECT thallium-201 bull’s-eye display: Gender differences. J Nucl Med 1988;29:1901-9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hansen CL, Crabbe D, Rubin S. Lower diagnostic accuracy of Thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1214-9.CrossRefPubMed Hansen CL, Crabbe D, Rubin S. Lower diagnostic accuracy of Thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1214-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana CA. The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:420-32.CrossRefPubMed Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana CA. The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:420-32.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: The Cedars-Sinai approach. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:433-54.CrossRefPubMed Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: The Cedars-Sinai approach. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:433-54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Hirsch M, et al. Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest 1980;65:1210-21.CrossRefPubMed Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Hirsch M, et al. Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest 1980;65:1210-21.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66-77.CrossRefPubMed Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:66-77.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sharir T, Germano G, Waechter PB, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. II: Validation and diagnostic yield. J Nucl Med 2000;41:720-7.PubMed Sharir T, Germano G, Waechter PB, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. II: Validation and diagnostic yield. J Nucl Med 2000;41:720-7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wolak A, Slomka PJ, Fish MB, et al. Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: Comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:476.CrossRef Wolak A, Slomka PJ, Fish MB, et al. Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: Comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:476.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, et al. Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:642-51.CrossRefPubMed Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, et al. Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:642-51.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies in Chinese population with Western normal databases
Authors
Dianfu Li, MD, PhD
Dong Li, MD
Jianlin Feng, MD
Donglan Yuan, CNMT
Kejiang Cao, MD, PhD
Ji Chen, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9217-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 3/2010 Go to the issue

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY NEWS UPDATE

Radiation Reduction: How Low Can YOU go?