Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 3/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Hypoglycemia | Review

Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Network Meta-analysis

Authors: Yawen Jiang, Jia Liu, Xin Chen, Wenying Yang, Weiping Jia, Jing Wu

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on clinical and safety outcomes including glycemic control and cardiometabolic indicators using network meta-analysis.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through June 30, 2019. Randomized clinical trials comparing one or more of six eligible GLP-1RAs with placebo or another eligible GLP-1RA were identified. We further screened studies that had 24–30 week follow-up periods and target endpoints. The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes included additional glycemic control indicators, cardiometabolic measures, and adverse events. Frequentist random-effect network meta-analyses were conducted for effect comparison.

Results

The NMA synthesized evidence from 54 studies covering 23,209 patients and 18 GLP-1RA regimens. All included GLP-1RA regimens except liraglutide 0.3 mg once weekly (QW) significantly lowered HbA1c after 24–30 weeks compared with placebo. The pairwise comparison of HbA1c-lowering effect showed that dulaglutide 0.75 mg QW, dulaglutide 1.5 mg QW, exenatide 2 mg QW, liraglutide 0.9 mg QW, liraglutide 1.2 mg QW, liraglutide 1.8 mg QW, loxenatide 100 µg QW, and loxenatide 200 µg QW were not significantly outperformed by any of the other regimens. The effects on blood pressure, weight, and lipids were relatively mixed. The GLP-1RA regimens had comparable safety profiles with regard to hypoglycemia and adverse events.

Conclusion

Regimens of GLP-1RAs had differential glycemic control and cardiometabolic effectiveness. Policymaking and patient-centric clinical decisions should take into consideration the comparative effectiveness profiles.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.
2.
go back to reference Kayaniyil S, Lozano-Ortega G, Bennett HA, et al. A network meta-analysis comparing exenatide once weekly with other GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7(1):27–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kayaniyil S, Lozano-Ortega G, Bennett HA, et al. A network meta-analysis comparing exenatide once weekly with other GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7(1):27–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Chaudhury A, Duvoor C, Reddy Dendi VS, et al. Clinical review of antidiabetic drugs: implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:6.CrossRef Chaudhury A, Duvoor C, Reddy Dendi VS, et al. Clinical review of antidiabetic drugs: implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aroda VR, Henry RR, Han J, et al. Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Ther. 2012;34(6):1247-1258.e1222.CrossRefPubMed Aroda VR, Henry RR, Han J, et al. Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Ther. 2012;34(6):1247-1258.e1222.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, et al. Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ. 2017;358:3932.CrossRef Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, et al. Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ. 2017;358:3932.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sun F, Yu K, Wu S, et al. Cardiovascular safety and glycemic control of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(3):386–95.CrossRefPubMed Sun F, Yu K, Wu S, et al. Cardiovascular safety and glycemic control of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(3):386–95.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zaccardi F, Htike ZZ, Webb DR, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Benefits and harms of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatments: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):102–13.CrossRefPubMed Zaccardi F, Htike ZZ, Webb DR, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Benefits and harms of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatments: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):102–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sharma D, Verma S, Vaidya S, Kalia K, Tiwari V. Recent updates on GLP-1 agonists: current advancements and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;108:952–62.CrossRefPubMed Sharma D, Verma S, Vaidya S, Kalia K, Tiwari V. Recent updates on GLP-1 agonists: current advancements and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;108:952–62.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang YL, Zhou C, Li XF, et al. Beinaglutide showed significant weight-loss benefit and effective glycaemic control for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting: a 3-month, multicentre, observational, retrospective, open-label study. Obes Sci Pract. 2019;5(4):366–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang YL, Zhou C, Li XF, et al. Beinaglutide showed significant weight-loss benefit and effective glycaemic control for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting: a 3-month, multicentre, observational, retrospective, open-label study. Obes Sci Pract. 2019;5(4):366–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-130.PubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-130.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Gao F, Lv X, Mo Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(12):2375–83. Gao F, Lv X, Mo Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(12):2375–83.
17.
18.
go back to reference White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 2015;15(4):951–985. White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 2015;15(4):951–985.
19.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol. 4. Amsterdam: Wiley; 2011. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol. 4. Amsterdam: Wiley; 2011.
20.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Higgins JPT, Hedges LV, Rothstein HR. Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(1):5–18.CrossRefPubMed Borenstein M, Higgins JPT, Hedges LV, Rothstein HR. Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(1):5–18.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Serghiou S, Goodman SN. Random-effects meta-analysis: summarizing evidence with caveats. JAMA. 2019;321(3):301–2.CrossRefPubMed Serghiou S, Goodman SN. Random-effects meta-analysis: summarizing evidence with caveats. JAMA. 2019;321(3):301–2.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Syn Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.CrossRef Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Syn Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wilding JPH. The importance of weight management in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(6):682–91.CrossRefPubMed Wilding JPH. The importance of weight management in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(6):682–91.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Network Meta-analysis
Authors
Yawen Jiang
Jia Liu
Xin Chen
Wenying Yang
Weiping Jia
Jing Wu
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01637-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Advances in Therapy 3/2021 Go to the issue