Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Anemia | Original Research

Myelopreservation with Trilaciclib in Patients Receiving Topotecan for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study

Authors: Lowell L. Hart, Renata Ferrarotto, Zoran G. Andric, J. Thaddeus Beck, Janakiraman Subramanian, Davorin Z. Radosavljevic, Bojan Zaric, Wahid T. Hanna, Raid Aljumaily, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Didier Verhoeven, Jie Xiao, Shannon R. Morris, Joyce M. Antal, Maen A. Hussein

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Multilineage myelosuppression is an acute toxicity of cytotoxic chemotherapy, resulting in serious complications and dose modifications. Current therapies are lineage specific and administered after chemotherapy damage has occurred. Trilaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that is administered prior to chemotherapy to preserve hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and immune system function during chemotherapy (myelopreservation).

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, patients with previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were randomized to receive intravenous trilaciclib 240 mg/m2 or placebo before topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1–5 of each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoints were duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN). Additional endpoints were prespecified to further assess the effect of trilaciclib on myelopreservation, safety, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and antitumor efficacy.

Results

Thirty-two patients received trilaciclib, and 29 patients received placebo. Compared with placebo, administration of trilaciclib prior to topotecan resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful decreases in DSN in cycle 1 (mean [standard deviation] 2 [3.9] versus 7 [6.2] days; adjusted one-sided P < 0.0001) and occurrence of SN (40.6% versus 75.9%; adjusted one-sided P = 0.016), with numerical improvements in additional neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet measures. Patients receiving trilaciclib had fewer grade ≥ 3 hematologic adverse events than patients receiving placebo, particularly neutropenia (75.0% versus 85.7%) and anemia (28.1% versus 60.7%). Myelopreservation benefits extended to improvements in PROs, specifically in those related to fatigue. Antitumor efficacy was comparable between treatment arms.

Conclusions

Compared with placebo, the addition of trilaciclib prior to topotecan for the treatment of patients with previously treated ES-SCLC improves the patient experience of receiving chemotherapy, as demonstrated by a reduction in chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, improved safety profile, improved quality of life and no detrimental effects on antitumor efficacy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02514447
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gong J, Salgia R. Managing patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):359–66.CrossRef Gong J, Salgia R. Managing patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):359–66.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Quoix E. Topotecan in the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer. Oncol Targets Ther. 2008;1:79–86.CrossRef Quoix E. Topotecan in the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer. Oncol Targets Ther. 2008;1:79–86.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Qin A, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment options for relapsed small-cell lung cancer: What progress have we made? J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):369–70.CrossRef Qin A, Kalemkerian GP. Treatment options for relapsed small-cell lung cancer: What progress have we made? J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):369–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference von Pawel J, Jotte R, Spigel DR, et al. Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(35):4012–9.CrossRef von Pawel J, Jotte R, Spigel DR, et al. Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(35):4012–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL, et al. Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):2086–92.CrossRef Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL, et al. Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):2086–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith RE. Trends in recommendations for myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4(7):649–58.CrossRef Smith RE. Trends in recommendations for myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006;4(7):649–58.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lyman GH. Chemotherapy dose intensity and quality cancer care. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2006;20(14 Suppl 9):16–25. Lyman GH. Chemotherapy dose intensity and quality cancer care. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2006;20(14 Suppl 9):16–25.
8.
go back to reference Havrilesky LJ, Reiner M, Morrow PK, Watson H, Crawford J. A review of relative dose intensity and survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;93(3):203–10.CrossRef Havrilesky LJ, Reiner M, Morrow PK, Watson H, Crawford J. A review of relative dose intensity and survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;93(3):203–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taylor SJ, Duyvestyn JM, Dagger SA et al. Preventing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression by repurposing the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(402). Taylor SJ, Duyvestyn JM, Dagger SA et al. Preventing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression by repurposing the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(402).
10.
go back to reference Crawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer. 2004;100(2):228–37.CrossRef Crawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer. 2004;100(2):228–37.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Blumberg N, Heal JM, Phillips GL. Platelet transfusions: trigger, dose, benefits, and risks. F1000 Med Rep. 2010;2:5. Blumberg N, Heal JM, Phillips GL. Platelet transfusions: trigger, dose, benefits, and risks. F1000 Med Rep. 2010;2:5.
12.
go back to reference Bohlius J, Bohlke K, Lazo-Langner A. Management of cancer-associated anemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: ASCO/ASH clinical practice guideline update. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(7):399–402.CrossRef Bohlius J, Bohlke K, Lazo-Langner A. Management of cancer-associated anemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: ASCO/ASH clinical practice guideline update. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(7):399–402.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference He S, Roberts PJ, Sorrentino JA, et al. Transient CDK4/6 inhibition protects hematopoietic stem cells from chemotherapy-induced exhaustion. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(387):eaal3986.CrossRef He S, Roberts PJ, Sorrentino JA, et al. Transient CDK4/6 inhibition protects hematopoietic stem cells from chemotherapy-induced exhaustion. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(387):eaal3986.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bisi JE, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Tavares FX, Strum JC. Preclinical characterization of G1T28: a novel CDK4/6 inhibitor for reduction of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(5):783–93.CrossRef Bisi JE, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Tavares FX, Strum JC. Preclinical characterization of G1T28: a novel CDK4/6 inhibitor for reduction of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(5):783–93.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lai A, Sorrentino JA, Dragnev K, et al. CDK4/6 inhibition enhances anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in preclinical models and enhances T-cell activation in patients with SCLC receiving chemotherapy. J Immunother. 2020;8(2):e000847. Lai A, Sorrentino JA, Dragnev K, et al. CDK4/6 inhibition enhances anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in preclinical models and enhances T-cell activation in patients with SCLC receiving chemotherapy. J Immunother. 2020;8(2):e000847.
16.
go back to reference Thill M, Schmidt M. Management of adverse events during cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor-based treatment in breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918793326.CrossRef Thill M, Schmidt M. Management of adverse events during cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor-based treatment in breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918793326.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference George J, Lim JS, Jang SJ, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2015;524(7563):47–53.CrossRef George J, Lim JS, Jang SJ, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2015;524(7563):47–53.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Weiss JM, Csoszi T, Maglakelidze M, et al. Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(10):1613–21.CrossRef Weiss JM, Csoszi T, Maglakelidze M, et al. Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(10):1613–21.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28):3199–212.CrossRef Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28):3199–212.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yost KJ, Eton DT. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):172–91.CrossRef Yost KJ, Eton DT. Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):172–91.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Butt Z, Webster K, Eisenstein AR, et al. Quality of life in lung cancer: the validity and cross-cultural applicability of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scale. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2005;19(2):389–420.CrossRef Butt Z, Webster K, Eisenstein AR, et al. Quality of life in lung cancer: the validity and cross-cultural applicability of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scale. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2005;19(2):389–420.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cella D, Eton DT, Fairclough DL, et al. What is a clinically meaningful change on the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(3):285–95.CrossRef Cella D, Eton DT, Fairclough DL, et al. What is a clinically meaningful change on the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(3):285–95.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cella D, Eton DT, Lai J-S, Peterman AH, Merkel DE. Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2002;24(6):547–61.CrossRef Cella D, Eton DT, Lai J-S, Peterman AH, Merkel DE. Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2002;24(6):547–61.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gupta A. Management of chemotherapy induced neutropenia – an unmet clinical need. Am J Biomed Sci Res. 2019;4:313–8.CrossRef Gupta A. Management of chemotherapy induced neutropenia – an unmet clinical need. Am J Biomed Sci Res. 2019;4:313–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64(2):328–40.CrossRef Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64(2):328–40.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Li Y, Klippel Z, Shih X, Reiner M, Wang H, Page JH. Relationship between severity and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and risk of infection among patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(10):4377–83.CrossRef Li Y, Klippel Z, Shih X, Reiner M, Wang H, Page JH. Relationship between severity and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and risk of infection among patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(10):4377–83.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jamil K, Kalyani P, Perimi R, Kameshwari SV. Assessment of severity of anemia and its effect on the quality of life (QOL) of patients suffering with various types of neoplasia. Biol Med (Aligarh). 2009;1(3):63–72. Jamil K, Kalyani P, Perimi R, Kameshwari SV. Assessment of severity of anemia and its effect on the quality of life (QOL) of patients suffering with various types of neoplasia. Biol Med (Aligarh). 2009;1(3):63–72.
28.
go back to reference Xu H, Gong Q, Vogl FD, Reiner M, Page JH. Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(2):723–30.CrossRef Xu H, Gong Q, Vogl FD, Reiner M, Page JH. Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(2):723–30.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wang S, Tang J, Sun T, et al. Survival changes in patients with small cell lung cancer and disparities between different sexes, socioeconomic statuses and ages. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1339.CrossRef Wang S, Tang J, Sun T, et al. Survival changes in patients with small cell lung cancer and disparities between different sexes, socioeconomic statuses and ages. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1339.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Balducci L. Myelosuppression and its consequences in elderly patients with cancer. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2003;17(11 Suppl 11):27–32. Balducci L. Myelosuppression and its consequences in elderly patients with cancer. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2003;17(11 Suppl 11):27–32.
31.
go back to reference Eckardt JR. Second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer. The case for systemic chemotherapy. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2003;17(2):181–8, 191; discussion 91–2, passim. Eckardt JR. Second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer. The case for systemic chemotherapy. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2003;17(2):181–8, 191; discussion 91–2, passim.
32.
go back to reference Liu X, Jiang T, Li W, et al. Characterization of never-smoking and its association with clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2018;115:109–15.CrossRef Liu X, Jiang T, Li W, et al. Characterization of never-smoking and its association with clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2018;115:109–15.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lu T, Yang X, Huang Y, et al. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer in the last four decades. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:943–53.CrossRef Lu T, Yang X, Huang Y, et al. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer in the last four decades. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:943–53.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Trigo J, Subbiah V, Besse B, et al. Lurbinectedin as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(5):645–54.CrossRef Trigo J, Subbiah V, Besse B, et al. Lurbinectedin as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(5):645–54.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kalemkerian GP, Akerley W, Bogner P, et al. Small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(1):78–98.CrossRef Kalemkerian GP, Akerley W, Bogner P, et al. Small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(1):78–98.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Myelopreservation with Trilaciclib in Patients Receiving Topotecan for Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study
Authors
Lowell L. Hart
Renata Ferrarotto
Zoran G. Andric
J. Thaddeus Beck
Janakiraman Subramanian
Davorin Z. Radosavljevic
Bojan Zaric
Wahid T. Hanna
Raid Aljumaily
Taofeek K. Owonikoko
Didier Verhoeven
Jie Xiao
Shannon R. Morris
Joyce M. Antal
Maen A. Hussein
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01538-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Advances in Therapy 1/2021 Go to the issue