Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Research

Caregiver Preference and Treatment Compliance in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease in South Korea: RECAP Study Results

Authors: Kang Joon Lee, Seong-Jin Cho, Byeong Chae Kim, Minseok Park, Jae-Hong Lee

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess caregiver preference and treatment compliance with oral and transdermal medications in a “real-world” setting in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in South Korea.

Methods

Real-world evaluation of compliance and preference in Alzheimer’s disease treatment (RECAP) was a 24-week, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study in patients with AD treated with oral or transdermal therapy. Here, we report data from patients living in South Korea. Eligible patients were grouped into one of two treatment cohorts: oral (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, or memantine) or transdermal (rivastigmine patch). Caregiver preference, patient compliance, and physician preference were assessed at week 24 (end of the study). Safety was assessed by reported adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 398 patients were enrolled (oral 51.8%; transdermal 48.2%) and 79.4% completed the study. Caregivers of patients that were exposed to either the oral or transdermal monotherapy showed a preference for the treatment to which the patients were exposed (both p < 0.0001). However, caregivers of patients that were exposed to both forms of treatments reported a higher preference for transdermal monotherapy (65.9%; p < 0.0041). Patients in both treatment cohorts showed good compliance, with an overall mean (SD) score of 8.84 (1.514) (a median of 9). Of the 15 participating physicians, eight indicated their preference for transdermal therapy and seven preferred oral therapy at week 24. A total of 133 (33.4%) patients reported at least one AE during the study period (oral: 60 patients; transdermal: 73 patients).

Conclusion

The study showed higher caregiver preference for transdermal monotherapy over oral monotherapy when patients with AD were exposed to both forms of treatment and good patient compliance for both oral and transdermal treatments.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A, Brayne C, Aarsland D, Jones E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1019–31.CrossRefPubMed Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A, Brayne C, Aarsland D, Jones E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1019–31.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brady R, Weinman J. Adherence to cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(5–6):351–63.PubMed Brady R, Weinman J. Adherence to cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(5–6):351–63.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Small G, Dubois B. A review of compliance to treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: potential benefits of a transdermal patch. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(11):2705–13.CrossRefPubMed Small G, Dubois B. A review of compliance to treatment in Alzheimer’s disease: potential benefits of a transdermal patch. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(11):2705–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Beinart N, Weinman J, Wade D, Brady R. Caregiver burden and psychoeducational interventions in Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2012;2(1):638–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beinart N, Weinman J, Wade D, Brady R. Caregiver burden and psychoeducational interventions in Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2012;2(1):638–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Noetzli M, Eap CB. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic aspects of drugs used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52(4):225–41.CrossRefPubMed Noetzli M, Eap CB. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic aspects of drugs used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52(4):225–41.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wentrup A, Oertel WH, Dodel R. Once-daily transdermal rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2008;2:245–54. Wentrup A, Oertel WH, Dodel R. Once-daily transdermal rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2008;2:245–54.
11.
go back to reference Winblad B, Cummings J, Andreasen N, et al. A six-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer’s disease—rivastigmine patch versus capsule. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(5):456–67.CrossRefPubMed Winblad B, Cummings J, Andreasen N, et al. A six-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer’s disease—rivastigmine patch versus capsule. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(5):456–67.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Winblad B, Kawata AK, Beusterien KM, et al. Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patch relative to capsules for treatment of probable Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(5):485–91.CrossRefPubMed Winblad B, Kawata AK, Beusterien KM, et al. Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patch relative to capsules for treatment of probable Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(5):485–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cummings J, Froelich L, Black SE, et al. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week study for efficacy and safety of a higher-dose rivastigmine patch (15 vs. 10 cm2) in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(5):341–53.CrossRefPubMed Cummings J, Froelich L, Black SE, et al. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week study for efficacy and safety of a higher-dose rivastigmine patch (15 vs. 10 cm2) in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(5):341–53.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grossberg G, Cummings J, Frölich L, et al. Efficacy of higher dose 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch on instrumental activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013;28(6):583–91.CrossRefPubMed Grossberg G, Cummings J, Frölich L, et al. Efficacy of higher dose 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch on instrumental activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013;28(6):583–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, Sadowsky CH, Meng X, Somogyi M. A, 24-week, randomized, controlled trial of rivastigmine patch 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h in severe Alzheimer’s dementia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19(10):745–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, Sadowsky CH, Meng X, Somogyi M. A, 24-week, randomized, controlled trial of rivastigmine patch 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h in severe Alzheimer’s dementia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19(10):745–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Population projections: population projections and summary indicators for Korea. http://kosis.kr/eng/. Accessed 21 Sept 2016. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Population projections: population projections and summary indicators for Korea. http://​kosis.​kr/​eng/​. Accessed 21 Sept 2016.
17.
go back to reference Pai MC, Aref H, Bassil N, et al. Real-world evaluation of compliance and preference in Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1779–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pai MC, Aref H, Bassil N, et al. Real-world evaluation of compliance and preference in Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1779–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Strobe Initiative, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Strobe Initiative, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Epstein M, International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices (GPP). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(8):589–95.CrossRefPubMed Epstein M, International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices (GPP). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(8):589–95.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(1–2):12–9. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(1–2):12–9.
21.
go back to reference Abetz L, Rofail D, Mertzanis P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease treatment: assessing caregiver preferences for mode of treatment delivery. Adv Ther. 2009;26(6):627–44.CrossRefPubMed Abetz L, Rofail D, Mertzanis P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease treatment: assessing caregiver preferences for mode of treatment delivery. Adv Ther. 2009;26(6):627–44.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Alzheimer’s disease international. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2112–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Alzheimer’s disease international. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2112–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Kim KW, Park JH, Kim MH, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in South Korea. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(2):281–91.PubMed Kim KW, Park JH, Kim MH, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in South Korea. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(2):281–91.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Blesa R, Ballard C, Orgogozo JM, Lane R, Thomas SK. Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patches versus capsules for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007;69(4 Suppl 1):S23–8.CrossRefPubMed Blesa R, Ballard C, Orgogozo JM, Lane R, Thomas SK. Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patches versus capsules for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007;69(4 Suppl 1):S23–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lee L, Hillier LM, Harvey D. Integrating community services into primary care: improving the quality of dementia care. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(1):11–21.CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Hillier LM, Harvey D. Integrating community services into primary care: improving the quality of dementia care. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(1):11–21.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gauthier S, Robillard A, Cohen S, EMBRACE investigators, et al. Real-life effectiveness and tolerability of the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: the EMBRACE study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(8):989–1000.CrossRefPubMed Gauthier S, Robillard A, Cohen S, EMBRACE investigators, et al. Real-life effectiveness and tolerability of the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: the EMBRACE study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(8):989–1000.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kulkantrakorn K, Tanyakitpisal P, Towanabut S, et al. Rivastigmine patch for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice in Thailand. Psychogeriatrics. 2013;13(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed Kulkantrakorn K, Tanyakitpisal P, Towanabut S, et al. Rivastigmine patch for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice in Thailand. Psychogeriatrics. 2013;13(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Boada M, Arranz FJ. Transdermal is better than oral: observational research of the satisfaction of caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with rivastigmine. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(1–2):23–33.CrossRefPubMed Boada M, Arranz FJ. Transdermal is better than oral: observational research of the satisfaction of caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with rivastigmine. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;35(1–2):23–33.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Han HJ, Lee JJ, Park SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Neurol. 2011;7(3):137–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han HJ, Lee JJ, Park SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Neurol. 2011;7(3):137–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Caregiver Preference and Treatment Compliance in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease in South Korea: RECAP Study Results
Authors
Kang Joon Lee
Seong-Jin Cho
Byeong Chae Kim
Minseok Park
Jae-Hong Lee
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0465-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Advances in Therapy 2/2017 Go to the issue