Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 12/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Research

Preferences Regarding Shared Decision-Making in Japanese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Authors: Ryuji Morishige, Hiroshi Nakajima, Kazutake Yoshizawa, Jörg Mahlich, Rosarin Sruamsiri

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Recent studies have indicated that patients are showing increased interest in playing a larger role in making decisions regarding their medical treatment. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease that manifests either as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). IBD treatment is multifaceted and dependent on patient-specific factors. The selection of treatment options is mostly driven by physicians, and it is unclear to what degree patients are involved in shared decision-making (SDM). The objective of the current study is to assess preferences among Japanese patients with IBD in regard to SDM during their treatment for IBD.

Methods

A nationwide web-based survey was performed in Japan during February 2016. The patients were asked for their basic clinical characteristics, socioeconomic status, medical history, treatment details, and preferences regarding SDM in IBD treatment. Differences were analyzed by chi-square, t tests, a multiple regression analysis, and ordered logistic regression analysis.

Results

In response to the screening survey, a total of 1068 Japanese nationals met the inclusion criteria for this study of being patients diagnosed with IBD who are currently receiving treatment. Of these, 235 had CD and 800 UC; 33 were not specified. Overall, the majority of these patients felt that SDM was very important. Furthermore, interest in SDM was strongly associated with certain disease comorbidities, surgical history, and current treatment, although there were some differences in the results between CD and UC.

Conclusion

The present study found that the majority of IBD patients in Japan wanted to have a role in their treatment plan. The results indicate that the patient’s preference in regard to SDM was driven by their perception of the severity or progression of their disease.

Funding

Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alden DLMM, Akashi J. Young adult preferences for physician decision-making style in Japan and the United States. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24(1):173–84.CrossRefPubMed Alden DLMM, Akashi J. Young adult preferences for physician decision-making style in Japan and the United States. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24(1):173–84.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cella D, Nichol MB, Eton D, Nelson JB, Mulani P. Estimating clinically meaningful changes for the functional assessment of cancer therapy—prostate: results from a clinical trial of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009;12(1):124–9.CrossRef Cella D, Nichol MB, Eton D, Nelson JB, Mulani P. Estimating clinically meaningful changes for the functional assessment of cancer therapy—prostate: results from a clinical trial of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009;12(1):124–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chan CM, Ahmad WA. Differences in physician attitudes towards patient-centredness: across four medical specialties. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):16–20.CrossRefPubMed Chan CM, Ahmad WA. Differences in physician attitudes towards patient-centredness: across four medical specialties. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):16–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Degner LFSJ, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.PubMed Degner LFSJ, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Flynn KE, Smith MA, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2006;63(5):1158–69.CrossRefPubMedCentral Flynn KE, Smith MA, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2006;63(5):1158–69.CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Giordano A, Mattarozzi K, Pucci E, et al. Participation in medical decision-making: attitudes of Italians with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275(1–2):86–91.CrossRefPubMed Giordano A, Mattarozzi K, Pucci E, et al. Participation in medical decision-making: attitudes of Italians with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275(1–2):86–91.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference O’Donnell M, Hunskaar S. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(3):243–51.CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell M, Hunskaar S. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(3):243–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference O’Donnell M, Hunskaar S. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making among Norwegian women with urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(11):1370–6.CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell M, Hunskaar S. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making among Norwegian women with urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(11):1370–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baars JE, Markus T, Kuipers EJ, van der Woude CJ. Patients’ preferences regarding shared decision-making in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a patient-empowerment study. Digestion. 2010;81(2):113–9.CrossRefPubMed Baars JE, Markus T, Kuipers EJ, van der Woude CJ. Patients’ preferences regarding shared decision-making in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a patient-empowerment study. Digestion. 2010;81(2):113–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Siegel CA. Shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: helping patients understand the tradeoffs between treatment options. Gut. 2012;61(3):459–65.CrossRefPubMed Siegel CA. Shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: helping patients understand the tradeoffs between treatment options. Gut. 2012;61(3):459–65.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siegel CA, Lofland JH, Naim A, et al. Gastroenterologists’ views of shared decision making for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(9):2636–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siegel CA, Lofland JH, Naim A, et al. Gastroenterologists’ views of shared decision making for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(9):2636–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Pollard SBN, Bryan S. Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(9):1046–57.CrossRefPubMed Pollard SBN, Bryan S. Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(9):1046–57.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Alatri A, Schoepfer A, Fournier N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(10):1200–5.CrossRefPubMed Alatri A, Schoepfer A, Fournier N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(10):1200–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bewtra M, Johnson FR. Assessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative data. Patient. 2013;6(4):241–55.CrossRefPubMed Bewtra M, Johnson FR. Assessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative data. Patient. 2013;6(4):241–55.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Ward JE. Measuring men’s preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(3):237–46.CrossRefPubMed Gattellari M, Ward JE. Measuring men’s preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(3):237–46.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ng SC, Zeng Z, Niewiadomski O, et al. Early course of inflammatory bowel disease in a population-based inception cohort study from 8 countries in Asia and Australia. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(1):86–95.e3; quiz e13–4. Ng SC, Zeng Z, Niewiadomski O, et al. Early course of inflammatory bowel disease in a population-based inception cohort study from 8 countries in Asia and Australia. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(1):86–95.e3; quiz e13–4.
18.
go back to reference Keely S, Talley NJ, Hansbro PM. Pulmonary-intestinal cross-talk in mucosal inflammatory disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(1):7–18.CrossRefPubMed Keely S, Talley NJ, Hansbro PM. Pulmonary-intestinal cross-talk in mucosal inflammatory disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(1):7–18.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Koutroumpakis E, Ramos-Rivers C, Regueiro M, et al. Association between long-term lipid profiles and disease severity in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):865–71.CrossRefPubMed Koutroumpakis E, Ramos-Rivers C, Regueiro M, et al. Association between long-term lipid profiles and disease severity in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):865–71.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Safroneeva E, Vavricka SR, Fournier N, Straumann A, Rogler G, Schoepfer AM. Prevalence and risk factors for therapy escalation in ulcerative colitis in the Swiss IBD Cohort Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(6):1348–58.PubMedPubMedCentral Safroneeva E, Vavricka SR, Fournier N, Straumann A, Rogler G, Schoepfer AM. Prevalence and risk factors for therapy escalation in ulcerative colitis in the Swiss IBD Cohort Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(6):1348–58.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Shields CG, Morrow GR, Griggs J, et al. Decision-making role preferences of patients receiving adjuvant cancer treatment: a university of Rochester cancer center community clinical oncology program. Support Cancer Therapy. 2004;1(2):119–26.CrossRef Shields CG, Morrow GR, Griggs J, et al. Decision-making role preferences of patients receiving adjuvant cancer treatment: a university of Rochester cancer center community clinical oncology program. Support Cancer Therapy. 2004;1(2):119–26.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9):688–96.PubMedPubMedCentral Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9):688–96.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Dronkers EA, Mes SW, Wieringa MH, van der Schroeff MP, Baatenburg de Jong RJ. Noncompliance to guidelines in head and neck cancer treatment; associated factors for both patient and physician. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dronkers EA, Mes SW, Wieringa MH, van der Schroeff MP, Baatenburg de Jong RJ. Noncompliance to guidelines in head and neck cancer treatment; associated factors for both patient and physician. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Kent EE, et al. Social support, self-efficacy for decision-making, and follow-up care use in long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):788–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Kent EE, et al. Social support, self-efficacy for decision-making, and follow-up care use in long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):788–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Preferences Regarding Shared Decision-Making in Japanese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients
Authors
Ryuji Morishige
Hiroshi Nakajima
Kazutake Yoshizawa
Jörg Mahlich
Rosarin Sruamsiri
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0436-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Advances in Therapy 12/2016 Go to the issue