Skip to main content
Top
Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2021

01-04-2021 | Bone Defect | Review

Managing bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: options and current trends

Authors: A. K. Aggarwal, V. Baburaj

Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

While tackling with bone deficiencies in the context of total knee arthroplasty, it is imperative for the arthroplasty surgeon to arm himself with an in-depth knowledge on the various management options available and to use the right option for the right type of defect in the right patient. Aim of this review paper is to focus on the various options available and discuss the evolving concepts and recent trends with regard to the implications and treatment of bone deficiencies, in primary total knee arthroplasty. Relevant literature is evaluated with specific focus on the modality used for managing a defect, their clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates. Out of various classifications described, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) system is universally employed to classify the bone defects. The currently available management options include more tibial resection, the use of bone cement to fill the defect, with or without augmentation with screws, bone grafting which may be autograft or allograft, metal augments, metaphyseal cones and sleeves. There is no single option which can be applied universally; each has its own advantages, disadvantages and specific indications with regard to application in specific types of defects, in specific patients as outlined in this article.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A (2016) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 50(5):518–522CrossRef Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A (2016) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 50(5):518–522CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mori S, Ogata K, Hara M (2001) Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. OrthopTraumatol 50(2):547–549 Mori S, Ogata K, Hara M (2001) Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. OrthopTraumatol 50(2):547–549
3.
go back to reference Cuckler JM (2004) Bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: graft augment and options. J Arthroplast 19:56–58CrossRef Cuckler JM (2004) Bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: graft augment and options. J Arthroplast 19:56–58CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Conaty JP, Schreiber R, Mehne DK, Hull D (1985) Technical factors that influence mechanical loosening of total knee arthroplasty. In: Dorr LD (ed) The knee: papers of the first scientific meeting of the knee society. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 121–135 Dorr LD, Conaty JP, Schreiber R, Mehne DK, Hull D (1985) Technical factors that influence mechanical loosening of total knee arthroplasty. In: Dorr LD (ed) The knee: papers of the first scientific meeting of the knee society. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 121–135
5.
go back to reference Dennis DA (1998) Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft. Orthopedics 21(9):1036–1038PubMed Dennis DA (1998) Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft. Orthopedics 21(9):1036–1038PubMed
6.
go back to reference Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123 Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123
7.
go back to reference Harada Y, Wevers HW, Cooke TD (1988) Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty 3(2):167–175CrossRef Harada Y, Wevers HW, Cooke TD (1988) Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty 3(2):167–175CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD (1984) Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:302–308 Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD (1984) Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:302–308
9.
go back to reference Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD (1989) Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:71–79 Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD (1989) Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:71–79
10.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1993) Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty. A Sequel J Arthroplast 8(1):63–65CrossRef Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1993) Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty. A Sequel J Arthroplast 8(1):63–65CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huten D (2013) Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S22–S33CrossRef Huten D (2013) Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S22–S33CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lotke PA, Wong RY, Ecker ML (1991) The use of methylmethacrylate in primary total knee replacements with large tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 270:288–294 Lotke PA, Wong RY, Ecker ML (1991) The use of methylmethacrylate in primary total knee replacements with large tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 270:288–294
13.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B, Orisek BS (2006) THE CLASSIC: bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 446:4–9 Dorr LD, Ranawat CS, Sculco TA, McKaskill B, Orisek BS (2006) THE CLASSIC: bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 446:4–9
14.
go back to reference Ritter MA (1986) Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1(2):125–129CrossRef Ritter MA (1986) Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1(2):125–129CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liu J, Sun ZH, Tian MQ, Wang P, Wang L (2011) Autologous bone grafting plus screw fixation for medial tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 91(29):2046–2050PubMed Liu J, Sun ZH, Tian MQ, Wang P, Wang L (2011) Autologous bone grafting plus screw fixation for medial tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 91(29):2046–2050PubMed
16.
go back to reference Franceschina MJ, Swienckowski JJ (1999) Correction of varus deformity with tibial flip autograft technique in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14(2):172–174CrossRef Franceschina MJ, Swienckowski JJ (1999) Correction of varus deformity with tibial flip autograft technique in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14(2):172–174CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Buck BE, Malinin TI (1994) Human bone and tissue allografts. Preparation and safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res 303:8–17 Buck BE, Malinin TI (1994) Human bone and tissue allografts. Preparation and safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res 303:8–17
18.
go back to reference Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O (2007) Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(5):574–579CrossRef Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O (2007) Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(5):574–579CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen F, Krackow KA (1994) Management of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:249–257CrossRef Chen F, Krackow KA (1994) Management of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:249–257CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Donati D, Di Bella C, Lucarelli E et al (2008) OP-1 application in bone allograft integration: preliminary results in sheep experimental surgery. Injury 39(Suppl 2):S65–S72CrossRef Donati D, Di Bella C, Lucarelli E et al (2008) OP-1 application in bone allograft integration: preliminary results in sheep experimental surgery. Injury 39(Suppl 2):S65–S72CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tigani D, Donati D, Moscato M, De Iure F, Boriani S (1996) Reconstruction by Grosse–Kempf nailing in resections for bone tumor. ChirOrganiMov 81(1):31–41 Tigani D, Donati D, Moscato M, De Iure F, Boriani S (1996) Reconstruction by Grosse–Kempf nailing in resections for bone tumor. ChirOrganiMov 81(1):31–41
22.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker-Fluegel MW, Windsor RE (1989) Inlay autogeneic bone grafting of tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:93–97 Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Haas SB, Becker-Fluegel MW, Windsor RE (1989) Inlay autogeneic bone grafting of tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:93–97
23.
go back to reference Windsor RE, Insall JN, Sculco TP (1986) Bone grafting of tibial defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:132–137 Windsor RE, Insall JN, Sculco TP (1986) Bone grafting of tibial defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:132–137
24.
go back to reference Naim S, Toms AD (2013) Impaction bone grafting for tibial defects in knee replacement surgery. Results at two years. ActaOrthopBelg 79(2):205–210 Naim S, Toms AD (2013) Impaction bone grafting for tibial defects in knee replacement surgery. Results at two years. ActaOrthopBelg 79(2):205–210
25.
go back to reference Kharbanda Y, Sharma M (2014) Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. Indian J Orthop 48(3):313–318CrossRef Kharbanda Y, Sharma M (2014) Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. Indian J Orthop 48(3):313–318CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Garino JP (2002) The use of impaction grafting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17(4 Suppl 1):94–97CrossRef Garino JP (2002) The use of impaction grafting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17(4 Suppl 1):94–97CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Peindl RD, Humble RS, Harrow ME, Frick SL (1996) Modular tibial augmentations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327:207–217CrossRef Fehring TK, Peindl RD, Humble RS, Harrow ME, Frick SL (1996) Modular tibial augmentations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327:207–217CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA (2005) Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. J Arthroplast 20(1):35–41CrossRef Hockman DE, Ammeen D, Engh GA (2005) Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis. J Arthroplast 20(1):35–41CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Baek SW, Choi CH (2011) Management of severe tibial bony defects with double metal blocks in knee arthroplasty-a technical note involving 9 cases. Acta Orthop 82(1):116–118CrossRef Baek SW, Choi CH (2011) Management of severe tibial bony defects with double metal blocks in knee arthroplasty-a technical note involving 9 cases. Acta Orthop 82(1):116–118CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Werle JR, Goodman SB, Imrie SN (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty using large distal femoral augments for severe metaphyseal bone deficiency: a preliminary study. Orthopedics 25(3):325–327PubMed Werle JR, Goodman SB, Imrie SN (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty using large distal femoral augments for severe metaphyseal bone deficiency: a preliminary study. Orthopedics 25(3):325–327PubMed
31.
go back to reference Lee JK, Choi CH (2011) Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(11):1493–1496CrossRef Lee JK, Choi CH (2011) Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(11):1493–1496CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63CrossRef Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sagomonyants KB, Hakim-Zargar M, Jhaveri A, Aronow MS, Gronowicz G (2011) Porous tantalum stimulates the proliferation and osteogenesis of osteoblasts from elderly female patients. J Orthop Res 29(4):609–616CrossRef Sagomonyants KB, Hakim-Zargar M, Jhaveri A, Aronow MS, Gronowicz G (2011) Porous tantalum stimulates the proliferation and osteogenesis of osteoblasts from elderly female patients. J Orthop Res 29(4):609–616CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zanirato A, Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Divano S, Burastero G, Felli L (2020) Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 104(1):25–35CrossRef Zanirato A, Formica M, Cavagnaro L, Divano S, Burastero G, Felli L (2020) Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 104(1):25–35CrossRef
35.
go back to reference You JS, Wright AR, Hasegawa I et al (2019) Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones. Knee 26(1):228–239CrossRef You JS, Wright AR, Hasegawa I et al (2019) Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones. Knee 26(1):228–239CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brown NM, Bell JA, Jung EK, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Levine BR (2015) The use of trabecular metal cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):90–93CrossRef Brown NM, Bell JA, Jung EK, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Levine BR (2015) The use of trabecular metal cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(9 Suppl):90–93CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Martín-Hernández C, Floría-Arnal LJ, Gómez-Blasco A et al (2018) Metaphyseal sleeves as the primary implant for the management of bone defects in total knee arthroplasty after post-traumatic knee arthritis. Knee 25(4):669–675CrossRef Martín-Hernández C, Floría-Arnal LJ, Gómez-Blasco A et al (2018) Metaphyseal sleeves as the primary implant for the management of bone defects in total knee arthroplasty after post-traumatic knee arthritis. Knee 25(4):669–675CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Managing bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: options and current trends
Authors
A. K. Aggarwal
V. Baburaj
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Milan
Keyword
Bone Defect
Published in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Electronic ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00683-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2021 Go to the issue