Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 2/2010

01-04-2010 | Original Article

Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society

Authors: Hirotaka Iwase, Junichi Kurebayashi, Hitoshi Tsuda, Tomohiko Ohta, Masafumi Kurosumi, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Yutaka Yamamoto, Takuji Iwase

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Triple negative (TN) breast cancer is defined as a subtype that is negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). To clarify the characteristics of TN breast cancer, surveillance data of the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society were analyzed.

Method

Of 14,748 cases registered in 2004, 11,705 (79.4%) were examined for ER, PgR, and HER2. Of these, the most prevalent (53.8%) was a hormone-responsive subtype with ER positive/PgR positive/HER2 negative, followed by TN subtype (15.5%).

Results

The proportion of postmenopausal patients was relatively high in the TN subtype. This cancer was diagnosed at a slightly advanced stage and with more cases positive for lymph node metastases than other subtypes. Morphologically, the TN subtype was more frequently classified as solid-tubular carcinoma. Mucinous, tubular, or secretary carcinomas were frequently found in the hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative subtype, while squamous cell carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinoma with bone/cartilage metaplasia were very frequently found in the TN group. Apocrine carcinoma was also found very frequently in the TN group. Selection of chemotherapy was not based on receptor subtypes, but was determined by the degree of tumor progression.

Conclusions

Although TN types are similar to basal-like breast tumor, as determined by gene profiling, their diagnosis needs verification by determination of the level of epidermal growth factor receptor or cytokeratin 5/6 expression. TN type should be examined further for immunohistochemical features and analyzed for prognostic details in this cohort.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–8.CrossRefPubMed Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.CrossRefPubMed Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nishimura R, Arima N. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer? Breast Cancer. 2008;15:303–8.CrossRefPubMed Nishimura R, Arima N. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer? Breast Cancer. 2008;15:303–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.CrossRefPubMed Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–23.CrossRefPubMed Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kobayashi S. Basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a review of its unique characteristics and their clinical significance. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:153–8.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi S. Basal-like subtype of breast cancer: a review of its unique characteristics and their clinical significance. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:153–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.CrossRefPubMed Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurebayashi J, Moriya T, Ishida T, Hirakawa H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, et al. The prevalence of intrinsic subtypes and prognosis in breast cancer patients of different races. Breast. 2007;16(Suppl 2):S72–7.CrossRefPubMed Kurebayashi J, Moriya T, Ishida T, Hirakawa H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, et al. The prevalence of intrinsic subtypes and prognosis in breast cancer patients of different races. Breast. 2007;16(Suppl 2):S72–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474–81.PubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474–81.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Oyama T, Arihiro K, Yamashita H, et al. Immunohistochemical Evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: a practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast cancer. 2006;13:232–5.CrossRefPubMed Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Oyama T, Arihiro K, Yamashita H, et al. Immunohistochemical Evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: a practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast cancer. 2006;13:232–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, Moorman PG, Conway K, Dressler LG, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:123–39.CrossRefPubMed Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, Moorman PG, Conway K, Dressler LG, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:123–39.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Steele D, Savage K, Simpson PT, Nesland JM, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours. Histopathology. 2006;49:10–21.CrossRefPubMed Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Steele D, Savage K, Simpson PT, Nesland JM, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours. Histopathology. 2006;49:10–21.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society
Authors
Hirotaka Iwase
Junichi Kurebayashi
Hitoshi Tsuda
Tomohiko Ohta
Masafumi Kurosumi
Kazuaki Miyamoto
Yutaka Yamamoto
Takuji Iwase
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0113-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Breast Cancer 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine