Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2018

01-09-2018

Qualitative study of mechanical parameters of conventional diagnostic X-ray machines in Mizoram

Authors: Jonathan Lalrinmawia, Kham Suan Pau, Ramesh Chandra Tiwari

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The present study examined the mechanical attributes of 135 conventional diagnostic X-ray machines in Mizoram, India. The purpose of studying the X-ray mechanical parameters, such as congruency, perpendicularity of the central beam, and half-value layer, was to improve the quality of the diagnostic image and reduce the patient dose. A battery-operated portable dosimeter was used to measure output radiation of the X-ray machine. The half-value layer was measured at a constant accelerating potential of 70 kVp and tube load. To measure the congruency and beam alignment perpendicularity, a congruence and alignment tool was used. The survey data were collected between June 2015 and June 2016. The authors followed international standard test procedures, and the results were compared to national and international standards. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17 was used to calculate the mean, range, and standard deviation. The half-value layer ranged from 0.45 to 3.00 mm; the mean half-value layer was 1.60 ± 0.51 SD mm. In comparison with national and international standards, only 27.83% (national) and 15.64% (international) of the machines’ filtration were found to be within acceptable limits. The congruence misalignment of the x-axis varied between 0.50% and 15.30% of the source-to-image distance; for the y-axis, it ranged from 0.50 to 10.90%. When the congruence between the radiation beam and optical field was tested, 80.85% of diagnostic X-ray machines did not meet the prescribed acceptance parameters. When the perpendicularity between the central beam and the image receptor was tested, 69.81% did not meet safety standards.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bennett BG. Exposures from medical radiation world-wide. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1991;36:237–42.CrossRef Bennett BG. Exposures from medical radiation world-wide. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1991;36:237–42.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bushong SC. Radiologic science for technologists: physics, biology, and protection, tenth edition, 3251 Riverport Lane, St. Louis, Missouri 63043. Amsterdam: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. pp. 578–9. Bushong SC. Radiologic science for technologists: physics, biology, and protection, tenth edition, 3251 Riverport Lane, St. Louis, Missouri 63043. Amsterdam: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. pp. 578–9.
3.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann of the ICRP 21 Oxford: Pergamon; 1990. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann of the ICRP 21 Oxford: Pergamon; 1990.
4.
go back to reference Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Notification No. 30.1.2002-ER, Appointment of Chairman, AERB as the ‘Competent Authority’ of radiation protection in India, The Gazette of India, Part-II, Sect. 3(ii), 2006. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Notification No. 30.1.2002-ER, Appointment of Chairman, AERB as the ‘Competent Authority’ of radiation protection in India, The Gazette of India, Part-II, Sect. 3(ii), 2006.
5.
go back to reference Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Notification No. 25/2/83-ER, Constitution of AERB, The Gazette of India, Part-II, Sect. 3(ii); 1983. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Notification No. 25/2/83-ER, Constitution of AERB, The Gazette of India, Part-II, Sect. 3(ii); 1983.
6.
go back to reference Supe SJ, Iyer PS, Sasane JB, Sawant SG, Shirva VK. Estimation and significance of patient dose from diagnostic X-ray practices in India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1992;43(1/4):209–11.CrossRef Supe SJ, Iyer PS, Sasane JB, Sawant SG, Shirva VK. Estimation and significance of patient dose from diagnostic X-ray practices in India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 1992;43(1/4):209–11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gray JE, Winkler NT, Stears J, Frank ED. Quality control in diagnostic imaging. Maryland USA. Germantown: An Aspen Publication; 1983. Gray JE, Winkler NT, Stears J, Frank ED. Quality control in diagnostic imaging. Maryland USA. Germantown: An Aspen Publication; 1983.
9.
go back to reference Papp J. Quality management in the imaging sciences 5th ed. 3251 Riverport Lane. Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015. Papp J. Quality management in the imaging sciences 5th ed. 3251 Riverport Lane. Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
10.
go back to reference Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of radiology, 4th ed. Springfield, Illinois 62717, USA: Thomas CC; 1983. Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of radiology, 4th ed. Springfield, Illinois 62717, USA: Thomas CC; 1983.
11.
go back to reference Asadinezhad M, Toosi MTB, Ebrahiminia A, Giahi M. Quality control assessment of conventional radiology devices in Iran. Iran J Med Phys. 2017;14(1):1–7. Asadinezhad M, Toosi MTB, Ebrahiminia A, Giahi M. Quality control assessment of conventional radiology devices in Iran. Iran J Med Phys. 2017;14(1):1–7.
12.
go back to reference Meredith WJ, Massey JB. Fundamental Physics of Radiology, 3rd ed. Bombay: Varghese Publishing House; 1992. Meredith WJ, Massey JB. Fundamental Physics of Radiology, 3rd ed. Bombay: Varghese Publishing House; 1992.
13.
go back to reference Ahmad MA. Safety of analytical X-ray appliances, Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2015. Ahmad MA. Safety of analytical X-ray appliances, Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2015.
14.
go back to reference IAEA. Diagnostic radiology physics; A handbook for teachers and students. 1400 Vienna, Austria, 2014. IAEA. Diagnostic radiology physics; A handbook for teachers and students. 1400 Vienna, Austria, 2014.
15.
go back to reference American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Publication Committee, Basic in Diagnostic Radiology, AAPM Report No 4; American Institute of Physics, New York, 1981. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Publication Committee, Basic in Diagnostic Radiology, AAPM Report No 4; American Institute of Physics, New York, 1981.
16.
go back to reference Lalrinmawia J, Pau KS, Tiwari RC. Investigations of workers dose due to stray radiation in X-ray installations in Mizoram. Recent advances in physics research and its relevance. New Delhi: Excel India publishers; 2017. pp. 258–63. (ISBN: ISBN: 978-93-86256-85-0$4). Lalrinmawia J, Pau KS, Tiwari RC. Investigations of workers dose due to stray radiation in X-ray installations in Mizoram. Recent advances in physics research and its relevance. New Delhi: Excel India publishers; 2017. pp. 258–63. (ISBN: ISBN: 978-93-86256-85-0$4).
17.
go back to reference Lalrinmawia J, Pau KS, Tiwari RC. Investigations of public dose due to stray radiation in X-ray installations in Mizoram. Science and technology for shaping the future of Mizoram. New Delhi: Allied publishers Pvt. Ltd.; 2017, pp. 305–9. (ISBN: 978-93-85926-49-5). Lalrinmawia J, Pau KS, Tiwari RC. Investigations of public dose due to stray radiation in X-ray installations in Mizoram. Science and technology for shaping the future of Mizoram. New Delhi: Allied publishers Pvt. Ltd.; 2017, pp. 305–9. (ISBN: 978-93-85926-49-5).
18.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Structural shielding design for medical X-rays imaging facilities. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Report; 2004. p. 147. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Structural shielding design for medical X-rays imaging facilities. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Report; 2004. p. 147.
19.
go back to reference Ebisawa MLNI., Magon MFA, Mascarenhas YM. Evolution of X-ray machine quality control acceptance indices. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(4):252–9.CrossRefPubMedCentral Ebisawa MLNI., Magon MFA, Mascarenhas YM. Evolution of X-ray machine quality control acceptance indices. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(4):252–9.CrossRefPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Operator Manual 06-526 RAD-CHECK™ PLUS. P/N 136201, Rev. 6, Fluke Corporation, USA, 2006. Operator Manual 06-526 RAD-CHECK™ PLUS. P/N 136201, Rev. 6, Fluke Corporation, USA, 2006.
21.
go back to reference Rasuli B, Pashazadeh AM, Ghorbani M, Juybari RT, Naserpour M. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1):374–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rasuli B, Pashazadeh AM, Ghorbani M, Juybari RT, Naserpour M. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1):374–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Code No. AERB/SC/MED-2 (Rev. 1), ‘Safety Code for Medical Diagnostic X-ray equipment and Installations’ AERB, Mumbai, 2001. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Safety Code No. AERB/SC/MED-2 (Rev. 1), ‘Safety Code for Medical Diagnostic X-ray equipment and Installations’ AERB, Mumbai, 2001.
23.
go back to reference Health Canada. Safety code 35: Safety procedures for the installation, use and control of X-ray equipment in large medical radiological facilities. Retrieved January 22 2017 from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca (2008). Health Canada. Safety code 35: Safety procedures for the installation, use and control of X-ray equipment in large medical radiological facilities. Retrieved January 22 2017 from http://​www.​hc-sc.​gc.​ca (2008).
25.
go back to reference Operator Manual. 07-661-7662 Collimator/Beam Alignment Test Tool. Fluke Corporation, USA; 2005. Operator Manual. 07-661-7662 Collimator/Beam Alignment Test Tool. Fluke Corporation, USA; 2005.
26.
go back to reference Sungita YY, Mdoe SLC. Msaki Peter. Diagnostic X-ray facilities as per quality control performances in Tanzania. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006;7 (4):66–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sungita YY, Mdoe SLC. Msaki Peter. Diagnostic X-ray facilities as per quality control performances in Tanzania. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006;7 (4):66–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Medical X-ray, Electron beam and Gamma-ray Protection for energies up to 50 MeV (Equipment Design, Performance and use). Bethesda: NCRP; NCRP Report, 102; 1989. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Medical X-ray, Electron beam and Gamma-ray Protection for energies up to 50 MeV (Equipment Design, Performance and use). Bethesda: NCRP; NCRP Report, 102; 1989.
29.
go back to reference Vlachos I, Tsantilas X, Kalyvas N, Delis H, Kandaraskis I, Panayiotakis G. Measuring scatter radiation in diagnostic X-rays for radiation protection purposes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015;165(1–4):382–5.CrossRefPubMed Vlachos I, Tsantilas X, Kalyvas N, Delis H, Kandaraskis I, Panayiotakis G. Measuring scatter radiation in diagnostic X-rays for radiation protection purposes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015;165(1–4):382–5.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference American Association of Physics in Medicine. Publication Committee ‘Protocols for the Radiation Safety Surveys of Diagnostic Radiological Equipment’ AAPM Report No 25 American Institute of Physics, New York; 1988. American Association of Physics in Medicine. Publication Committee ‘Protocols for the Radiation Safety Surveys of Diagnostic Radiological Equipment’ AAPM Report No 25 American Institute of Physics, New York; 1988.
31.
go back to reference Paolicchi F, Miniati F, Bastiani L, Faggioni L, Ciaramella A, Creonti I, et al. Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers. Insight Imaging. 2016;7(2):233–42.CrossRef Paolicchi F, Miniati F, Bastiani L, Faggioni L, Ciaramella A, Creonti I, et al. Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers. Insight Imaging. 2016;7(2):233–42.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sonawane AU, Meghraj S, Sunil KJVK, Kulkarni ASVK Pradhan AS. Radiological safety status and quality assurance audit of medical X-ray diagnostic installations in India. J Med Phys. 2010;35:229–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sonawane AU, Meghraj S, Sunil KJVK, Kulkarni ASVK Pradhan AS. Radiological safety status and quality assurance audit of medical X-ray diagnostic installations in India. J Med Phys. 2010;35:229–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Hude W. Radiation risks: what is to be done? American Roentgen Ray Society. 2015;204:124–7.CrossRef Hude W. Radiation risks: what is to be done? American Roentgen Ray Society. 2015;204:124–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Qualitative study of mechanical parameters of conventional diagnostic X-ray machines in Mizoram
Authors
Jonathan Lalrinmawia
Kham Suan Pau
Ramesh Chandra Tiwari
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0464-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2018 Go to the issue