Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2009

01-01-2009

Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles

Authors: Issei Mori, Yoshio Machida

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The point spread function (PSF) method is currently the one predominantly used to determine the modulation transfer function (MTF) of an X-ray CT system. However, the image examined with the PSF method must have a very high contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); it must also be reconstructed with a fine pixel pitch using a zooming reconstruction. Therefore, the PSF method is often inappropriate for describing the MTF of clinical operating conditions when image linearity is not guaranteed. The edge spread function (ESF) method requires no zooming reconstruction, but its susceptibility to image noise is no better than that of the PSF method. We describe a technique for rendering the ESF method robust to image noise. We smooth out the noisy ESF through multiple stages of filtering. Invariably, the line spread function (LSF) obtained from the smoothed ESF is blurred, and the MTF obtained from the LSF is incorrect. However, because the filtering that has been applied is known, much of the LSF blurring can be corrected. An estimate of the true LSF is obtainable from the blurred LSF, assuming that the true LSF is not very different from either a Gaussian or a composite of multiple Gaussians. For an image reconstructed with a kernel for soft-tissue imaging, the MTF obtained by our method is sufficiently consistent with the theoretical MTF, even when the CNR is as low as 2.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Metz C, Doi K. Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol. 1994;24:1079–106.CrossRef Metz C, Doi K. Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol. 1994;24:1079–106.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kalura M, Wittram C, Maher M, Sharma A, Avinash G, Karau K, et al. Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest images? Pilot study. Radiology. 2003;228:257–64.CrossRef Kalura M, Wittram C, Maher M, Sharma A, Avinash G, Karau K, et al. Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest images? Pilot study. Radiology. 2003;228:257–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Okumura M, Ota T, Tsukagoshi S, Katada K. New method of evaluating edge-preserving adaptive filters for computed tomography (CT): digital phantom method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2006;62:971–8.CrossRef Okumura M, Ota T, Tsukagoshi S, Katada K. New method of evaluating edge-preserving adaptive filters for computed tomography (CT): digital phantom method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2006;62:971–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wessling J, Esseling R, Raupach R, Fockenberg S, Osada N, Gerss J, et al. The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1885–91.CrossRefPubMed Wessling J, Esseling R, Raupach R, Fockenberg S, Osada N, Gerss J, et al. The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1885–91.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Judy P. The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. Med Phys. 1976;3:233–6.CrossRefPubMed Judy P. The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. Med Phys. 1976;3:233–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Fujita H, Tsai D, Itho T, Doi K, Morishita J, Ueda K, et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11:34–9.CrossRefPubMed Fujita H, Tsai D, Itho T, Doi K, Morishita J, Ueda K, et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11:34–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Peters T, Lewitt R. Computed tomography with fan beam geometry. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977;1:429–36.CrossRefPubMed Peters T, Lewitt R. Computed tomography with fan beam geometry. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977;1:429–36.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kak A, Slaney M. Principles of computed tomographic imaging. Philadelphia: SIAM Press; 2001. pp. 77–86. Kak A, Slaney M. Principles of computed tomographic imaging. Philadelphia: SIAM Press; 2001. pp. 77–86.
10.
go back to reference Nickoloff E, Riley R. A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. Med Phys. 1976;12:437–41.CrossRef Nickoloff E, Riley R. A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. Med Phys. 1976;12:437–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cunningham I, Fenster A. A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite-element differentiation. Med Phys. 1987;14:533–7.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham I, Fenster A. A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finite-element differentiation. Med Phys. 1987;14:533–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Buhr E, Günther-Kohfahl S, Neitzel U. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. Med Phys. 2003;30:2323–31.CrossRefPubMed Buhr E, Günther-Kohfahl S, Neitzel U. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. Med Phys. 2003;30:2323–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Glover G, Eisner R. Theoretical resolution of computer tomography systems. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:85–91.CrossRefPubMed Glover G, Eisner R. Theoretical resolution of computer tomography systems. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:85–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Durand E, Rüegsegger P. High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. Med Phys. 1992;19:569–73.CrossRefPubMed Durand E, Rüegsegger P. High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. Med Phys. 1992;19:569–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Bracewell R. The Fourier transform and its application, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999. pp. 434–5. Bracewell R. The Fourier transform and its application, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999. pp. 434–5.
17.
go back to reference Bracewell R. The Fourier transform and its application, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999. pp. 186–90. Bracewell R. The Fourier transform and its application, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999. pp. 186–90.
Metadata
Title
Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles
Authors
Issei Mori
Yoshio Machida
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-008-0039-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2009 Go to the issue