Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
Published in: Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Physical Activity (Der Warburton, Section Editor)

The Exercising Commuter: Is Commuting a Healthy Way to Be Active?

Author: Roy J. Shephard

Published in: Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

After summarizing knowledge gaps through 2008, research on exercise commuting is reviewed for 2008–2011. Evidence-based reports on physical activity needs have emerged from many consensus panels. There seems potential to meet aerobic requirements by cycling to work. Rapid walking may also be effective in older adults. It remains unclear how far exercise commuting can strengthen muscle and bones, enhance flexibility and balance, and prevent obesity. Recent reports have characterized current commuters and urban design features favoring active commuting. Evidence has accumulated showing enhanced cardiorespiratory fitness and fewer cardiovascular risk factors among active commuters. The advantages of enhanced health outweigh disadvantages of cycling (air pollutant exposure and dangers from cars), but attempts to increase active commuting have had only limited success. In children, physical activity needs exceed commuting distances, and walking to school programs have done little to augment daily activity. Exercise commuting could contribute to the physical needs of adults, but further research is required to realize this potential.
Literature
1.
• Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59. This paper summarizes the latest statement on the type and amount of physical activity needed by the adult population as agreed by a panel of the American College of Sports Medicine. PubMedCrossRef
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services PHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
3.
•• Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2010;7:3913. Published online. This paper offers an exhaustive summary of the evidence-base for current exercise recommendations in the adult population, as researched by the authors and reviewed by a consensus panel of the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. CrossRef
4.
World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
5.
de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011;37:766–77.PubMedCrossRef
6.
• Department of Health and Department for Transport. Active travel strategy. London: Department of Health and Department for Transport, 2010. This report includes many helpful graphs comparing exercise commuting among various European countries.
7.
Tin Tin S, Woodward A, Thornley S, et al. Cycling and walking to work in New Zealand, 1991–2006: regional and individual differences, and pointers to effective interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:64. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Friends of the Earth. Cycling and health. Friends of the Earth Conference Proceedings, London. London: Friends of the Earth; 1990.
9.
10.
Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothie H, et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334:1204–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Shephard RJ. Physiology and biochemistry of exercise. New York, NY: Praeger; 1982.
13.
Kesaniemi YK, Danforth E, Jensen PJ, et al. Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidence-based symposium. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:S351–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
•• Aoyagi Y, Shephard RJ. Steps per day. The road to seniors health. Sports Med. 2009;39:423–38. This paper summarizes pedometer/accelerometer based evidence on the relationship between one potential mode of commuting (walking) and health status. It suggests that differing amounts of such activity are needed to enhance different components of health. PubMedCrossRef
15.
Daugbjerg SB, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F, et al. Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:805–17.PubMed
16.
Martin BW, Mäder U, Stamm HP, et al. Physical activity and health – what are the recommendations and where do we find the Swiss population? Schweiz Z Sportmed Sport Traumatol. 2009;57:37–43.
17.
18.
Engbers LH, Hendriksen IJ. Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:89. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
19.
World Health Organization. Obesity. Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
20.
Löfgren B, Stenevi-Lundgren S, Dencker M, et al. The mode of school transportation in pre-pubertal children does not influence the accrual of bone mineral or the gain in bone size – two year prospective data from the paediatric osteoporosis preventive (POP) study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:25. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Oja P, Bull FC, Fogelholm M, et al. Physical activity recommendations for health: what should Europe do? BMC Publ Health. 2010;10:10. Published online.CrossRef
22.
Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Mountjoy A, Andersen LB, Armstrong N, et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on the health and physical fitness of young people through physical activity and sport. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:839–48.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Janssen I, et al. Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Children and Youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36:59–64.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Coogan PF, White LF, Adler TJ, et al. Prospective study of urban form and physical activity in the Black Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:1105–17.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Dogra S, Meisner BA, Ardern CI. Variation in mode of physical activity by ethnicity and time since immigration: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:75. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kitchen P, Williams A, Chowhan J. Walking to work in Canada: health benefits, socio-economic characteristics and urban-regional variations. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11:212. Published online.CrossRef
28.
Brockman R, Fox KR. Physical activity by stealth? The potential health benefits of a workplace transport plan. Publ Health. 2011;125:210–6.CrossRef
29.
Steinbach R, Green J, Datta J, et al. Cycling and the city: a case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1123–30.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Wahlgren L, Schantz P. The active commuting route environment scale (ACRES): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:58. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Wahlgren L, Schantz P. Bikeability and methodological issues using the active commuting route environment scale (ACRES) in a metropolitan setting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:6. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40 Suppl 7:S550–6.PubMed
33.
Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sugiyama T, et al. Bicycle use for transport in an Australian and a Belgian city: associations with built-environment attributes. J Urban Health. 2010;87:189–98.PubMedCrossRef
34.
• MacDonald JM, Stokes RJ, Cohen DA, et al. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:105–12. This study offers prospective insight into the effects of change in one component of urban design in Charlotte, NC. PubMedCrossRef
35.
Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, et al. Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Publ Health. 2010;10:703. Published online.CrossRef
36.
•• Lusk AC, Mekary RA, Feskanich D, et al. Bicycle riding, walking, and weight gain in premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1050–6. This report offers an unusually long period of follow-up (16 years) of participants in the US Nurses' Health Study. It shows that individuals who engaged in active commuting gained significantly less weight over the observation period. PubMedCrossRef
37.
Arango CM, Parra DC, Eyler A, et al. Walking or bicycling to school and weight status among adolescents from Montería, Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8 Suppl 2:S171–7.PubMed
38.
Landsberg B, Plachta-Danielzik S, Much D, et al. Associations between active commuting to school, fat mass and lifestyle factors in adolescents: the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;47:739–47.CrossRef
39.
Lubans DR, Boreham CA, Kelly P, et al. The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:5. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Faulkner GE, Buliung RN, Flora PK, et al. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2009;48:3–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Lee MC, Orenstein MR, Richardson MJ. Systematic review of active commuting to school and childrens physical activity and weight. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:930–49.PubMed
42.
Madsen KA, Gosliner W, Woodward-Lopez G, et al. Physical activity opportunities associated with fitness and weight status among adolescents in low-Income communities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:1014–21.PubMedCrossRef
43.
• Gordon-Larsen P, Boone-Heinonen JE, Sidney S, et al. Active commuting and cardiovascular disease risk: the CARDIA study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1216–23. This study is cross-sectional in type, but it does look at associations between a wide variety of cardiovascular risk factors and exercise commuting. PubMedCrossRef
44.
Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Jago R, et al. Longitudinal associations of cycling to school with adolescent fitness. Prev Med. 2008;47:324–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Andersen LB, Lawlor DA, Cooper AR, et al. Physical fitness in relation to school in adolescents: the Danish youth and sports study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19:406–11.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Chillón P, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Veidebaum T, et al. Active commuting to school in children and adolescents: an opportunity to increase physical activity and fitness. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:873–9.PubMedCrossRef
47.
• Chillón P, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, et al. A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:10. Published online. A detailed review of 14 recent quasi-experimental studies intended to increase the proportion of children engaged in active commuting demonstrates only modest effect sizes. PubMedCrossRef
48.
Voss C, Sandercock G. Aerobic fitness and mode of travel to school in English school children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:281–7.PubMed
49.
• Lambiase MJ, Barry HM, Roemmich JN. Effect of a simulated active commute to school on cardiovascular stress reactivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1609–16. This paper is of some interest because it looks at an aspect of active commuting not commonly considered – the reduction of stress. PubMedCrossRef
50.
Yang L, Sahlqvist S, McMinn A, et al. Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c5293.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Sloman L, Cavill N, Cope A, et al. Analysis and synthesis of evidence on the effects of investment in six cycling demonstration towns. London: Department for Transport; 2009.
52.
Hemmingsson E, Udden J, Neovius M, et al. Increased physical activity in abdominally obese women through support for changed commuting habits: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Obes. 2009;33:645–52.CrossRef
53.
Henriksson G, Hagman O, Andréasson H. Environmentally reformed travel habits during the 2006 congestion charge trial in Stockholm – a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:3202–15.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Bos I, Jacobs L, Nawrot TS, et al. No exercise-induced increase in serum BDNF after cycling near a major traffic road. Neurosci Lett. 2011;500:129–32.PubMedCrossRef
55.
• Jacobs L, Nawrot TS, de Geus B, et al. Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: an intervention study. Environ Health. 2010;9:64. Published online. Increased exposure to air pollutants is one negative consequence of cycling to work, but this study suggests that the effects upon the airways are not very serious. PubMedCrossRef
56.
de Hartog JJ, Boogaard H, Nijland H, et al. Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks? Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1109–16.CrossRef
57.
• Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Tainio M, et al. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. BMJ. 2011;343:d4521. Published online. This study from Barcelona theoretically compares increased deaths from traffic accidents and greater exposure to air pollutants with the enhanced prognosis resulting from the prevention of cardiovascular disease. PubMedCrossRef
58.
Buliung RN, Mitra R, Faulkner G. Active school transportation in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an exploration of trends in space and time. Prev Med. 2009;48:507–12.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Davison KK, Werder JL, Lawson CT. Children's active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(3):A100. Published online.PubMed
60.
Van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Corpuz G, et al. Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates? Prev Med. 2008;46:60–2.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Panter JR, Jones AP, van Sluijs EM. Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:34. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Yeung J, Wearing S, Hills AP. Child transport practices and perceived barriers in active commuting to school. Transp Res Part A. 2008;42:895–900.
63.
Wen LM, Fry D, Rissel C, et al. Factors associated with children being driven to school: implications for walk to school programs. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:325–34.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Page AS, Cooper AR, Griew P, et al. Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children's participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the PEACH Project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:17. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Voorhees CC, Ashwood JS, Evenson KR, et al. Neighborhood design and perceptions: relationship with active commuting. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1253–60.PubMed
66.
McDonald NC. Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students. Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:341–4.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Brophy S, Cooksey R, Lyons RA, et al. Parental factors associated with walking to school and participation in organized activities at age 5: analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11:14. Published online.CrossRef
68.
Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G, et al. Criterion distances and correlates of active transportation to school in Belgian older adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:87. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Robertson-Wilson JE, Leatherdale ST, Wong SL. Social-ecological correlates of active commuting to school among high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42:486–95.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Faulkner GE, Richichi V, Buliung RN, et al. What's "quickest and easiest?": parental decision making about school trip mode. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:62. Published online.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Cooper AR, Andersen BL, Wedderkopp N, et al. Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29:179–84.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Sirard JR, Alhassan S, Spencer TR, et al. Changes in physical activity from walking to school. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:324–6.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Mendoza A, Watson K, Baranowski T, et al. The walking school bus and children’s physical activity: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e537–44.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Exercising Commuter: Is Commuting a Healthy Way to Be Active?
Author
Roy J. Shephard
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1932-9520
Electronic ISSN: 1932-9563
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-012-0240-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 4/2012 Go to the issue

Invited Commentary

A Lucky Find in AF Trials – a decrease in ICH with new OACs

Hypertension (P Hamet, Section Editor)

Hypertension Prevalence and Control: Impact of Method of Blood Pressure Measurement

Physical Activity (DER Warburton, Section Editor)

The Cardiometabolic Benefits of Routine Physical Activity in Persons Living with Spinal Cord Injury

Physical Activity (DER Warburton, Section Editor)

Researching Those Who Have the Most to Gain: Focused Physical Activity Promotion in Lower Socioeconomic Populations

Physical Activity (DER Warburton, Section Editor)

Exercise-Induced Signals for Vascular Endothelial Adaptations: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease

Hypertension (P Hamet, Section Editor)

J Curve in Hypertension

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits