Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2/2012

Open Access 01-10-2012 | Original Article

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Computer-Tailored Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Promotion Programs: an Update

Authors: Karen Broekhuizen, M.Sc., Willemieke Kroeze, Ph.D., Mireille NM van Poppel, Ph.D., Anke Oenema, Ph.D., Johannes Brug, Ph.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A review update is necessary to document evidence regarding the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and nutrition education.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to summarize the latest evidence on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and nutrition education, and to compare the results to the 2006 review.

Methods

Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating computer-tailored physical activity and nutrition education aimed at primary prevention in adults, published from September 2004 through June 2011.

Results

Compared to the findings in 2006, a larger proportion of studies found positive effects for computer-tailored programs compared to generic or no information, including those for physical activity promotion. Effect sizes were small and generally at short- or medium-term follow-up.

Conclusions

The results of the 2006 review were confirmed and reinforced. Future interventions should focus on establishing larger effect sizes and sustained effects and include more generic health education control groups and objective measurements of dietary behavior.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002;360:1347-60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JP, et al. Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review. BMJ. 2001;322:757-63.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31:205-23.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med. 2010;51:214-21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Lustria ML, Cortese J, Noar SM, Glueckauf RL. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: Review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:156-73.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat A. Computer-tailored physical activity behavior change interventions targeting adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:30.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Neville LM, Milat AJ, O'Hara B. Computer-tailored weight reduction interventions targeting adults: A narrative systematic review. Health Promot J Austr. 2009;20:48-57.PubMed
8.
Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat AJ. Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: A systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2009;24:699-720.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673-93.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Noar SM, Grant Harrington N, Shemanksi Aldrich R. The role of message tailoring in the development of persuasive health communication messages. In: Beck CS, ed. Communication Yearbook 33. Routledge, 2009:73-133.
11.
Eyles HC, Mhurchu CN. Does tailoring make a difference? A systematic review of the long-term effectiveness of tailored nutrition education for adults. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:464-80.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Yap TL, Davis LS. Physical activity: The science of health promotion through tailored messages. Rehabil Nurs. 2008;33:55-62.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Enwald HP, Huotari ML. Preventing the obesity epidemic by second generation tailored health communication: An interdisciplinary review. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e24.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: A meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Prev Med. 2008;47:3-16.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1028S-34S.PubMed
16.
Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:290-8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
18.
Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:276-83.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic; 1977.
20.
21.
Mullen PD, Simons-Morton DG, Ramirez G, Frankowski RF, Green LW, Mains DA. A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;32:157-73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. Efficacy of Two Tailored Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:405-17.PubMedCrossRef
23.
van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. The long-term efficacy of two computer-tailored physical activity interventions for older adults: Main effects and mediators. Health Psychol. 2011;30:442-52.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Walker SN, Pullen CH, Boeckner L, et al. Clinical trial of tailored activity and eating newsletters with older rural women. Nurs Res. 2009;58:74-85.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Walker SN, Pullen CH, Hageman PA, et al. Maintenance of activity and eating change after a clinical trial of tailored newsletters with older rural women. Nurs Res. 2010;59:311-21.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Elder JP, Ayala GX, Campbell NR, et al. Interpersonal and print nutrition communication for a Spanish-dominant Latino population: Secretos de la Buena Vida. Health Psychol. 2005;24:49-57.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Tanaka M, Adachi Y, Adachi K, Sato C. Effects of a non-face-to-face behavioral weight-control program among Japanese overweight males: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Med. 2010;17:17-24.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Adachi Y, Sato C, Yamatsu K, Ito S, Adachi K, Yamagami T. A randomized controlled trial on the long-term effects of a 1-month behavioral weight control program assisted by computer tailored advice. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45:459-70.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al. Multiple risk expert systems interventions: Impact of simultaneous stage-matched expert system interventions for smoking, high-fat diet, and sun exposure in a population of parents. Health Psychol. 2004;23:503-16.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Redding C, et al. Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med. 2005;41:406-16.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Do M, Kattelmann K, Boeckner L, et al. Low-income young adults report increased variety in fruit and vegetable intake after a stage-tailored intervention. Nutr Res. 2008;28:517-22.PubMedCrossRef
32.
de Vries H, Kremers SPJ, Smeets T, Brug J, Eijmael K. The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22:417-25.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Smeets T, Kremers SPJ, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailored feedback on multiple health behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:117-23.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Winett RA, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Bowden T. Guide to health: Nutrition and physical activity outcomes of a group-randomized trial of an Internet-based intervention in churches. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:251-61.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Slootmaker SM, Chinapaw MJM, Schuit AJ, Seidell JC, van Mechelen W. Feasibility and effectiveness of online physical activity advice based on a personal activity monitor: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e27.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Sternfeld B, Block C, Quesenberry CPJ, et al. Improving diet and physical activity with ALIVE: A worksite randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:475-83.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, et al. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9:e7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Rothert K, Strecher VJ, Doyle LA, et al. Web-based weight management programs in an integrated health care setting: A randomized, controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:266-72.CrossRef
39.
Elder JP, Ayala GX, Campbell NR, et al. Long-term effects of a communication intervention for Spanish-dominant Latinas. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:159-66.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Hellman EA, Williams MA, Thalken L. Modifications of the 7-Day Activity Interview for Use Among Older Adults. J Appl Gerontol. 1996;15:116-32.CrossRef
41.
Hayden-Wade HA, Coleman KJ, Sallis JF, Armstrong C. Validation of the telephone and in-person interview versions of the 7-day PAR. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:801-9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:91-106.PubMed
43.
Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, et al. Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:794-804.PubMed
44.
Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, Kromhout D. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1163-9.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-95.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Rosenberg DE, Bull FC, Marshall AL, Sallis JF, Bauman AE. Assessment of sedentary behavior with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(Suppl 1):S30-S44.PubMed
47.
Kline GM, Porcari JP, Hintermeister R, et al. Estimation of VO2max from a one-mile track walk, gender, age, and body weight. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;19:253-9.PubMed
48.
Hageman PA, Walker SN, Pullen CH, Pellerito P. Test-Retest Reliability of the Rockport Fitness Walking Test and Other Fitness Measures in Women Ages 50-69 Years. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2001;24.
49.
Buckley JP, Sim J, Eston RG, Hession R, Fox R. Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:197-205.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Morris M, Lamb KL, Hayton J, Cotterrell D, Buckley J. The validity and reliability of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a treadmill-based sub-maximal perceptually regulated exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:983-8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Block G, Hartman AM, Naughton D. A reduced dietary questionnaire: Development and validation. Epidemiology. 1990;1:58-64.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I. The relative validity of a short Dutch questionnaire as a means to categorize adults and adolescents to total and saturated fat intake. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001;14:377-90.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Ni Mhurchu C, Blakely T, Jiang Y, Eyles HC, Rodgers A. Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:736-47.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Prochaska JO, Butterworth S, Redding CA, et al. Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Prev Med. 2008;46:226-31.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Haapala I, Barengo NC, Biggs S, Surakka L, Manninen P. Weight loss by mobile phone: A 1-year effectiveness study. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:2382-91.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Werkman A, Hulshof PJ, Stafleu A, et al. Effect of an individually tailored one-year energy balance programme on body weight, body composition and lifestyle in recent retirees: A cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:110.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Feunekes GI, Van Staveren WA, De Vries JH, Burema J, Hautvast JG. Relative and biomarker-based validity of a food-frequency questionnaire estimating intake of fats and cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;58:489-96.PubMed
58.
Feunekes IJ, Van Staveren WA, Graveland F, De VJ, Burema J. Reproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess the intake of fats and cholesterol in The Netherlands. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1995;46:117-23.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Quintiliani LM, Campbell MK, Bowling JM, Steck S, Haines PS, DeVellis BM. Results of a randomized trial testing messages tailored to participant-selected topics among female college students: Physical activity outcomes. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:517-26.PubMed
60.
Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, de Weerdt I, de Vries H. Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:125-35.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Wanner M, Martin-Diener E, Braun-Fahrlander C, Bauer G, Martin BW. Effectiveness of active-online, an individually tailored physical activity intervention, in a real-life setting: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e23.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Dunton GF, Robertson TP. A tailored Internet-plus-email intervention for increasing physical activity among ethnically-diverse women. Prev Med. 2008;47:605-11.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Evaluation of a website-delivered computer-tailored intervention for increasing physical activity in the general population. Prev Med. 2007;44:209-17.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Smeets T, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:402-13.PubMedCrossRef
65.
van Keulen HM, Mesters I, Ausems M, et al. Tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing are equally successful in improving multiple lifestyle behaviors in a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41:104-18.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Hageman PA, Walker SN, Pullen CH. Tailored versus standard internet-delivered interventions to promote physical activity in older women. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2005;28:28-33.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Marcus BH, Napolitano MA, King AC, et al. Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: Project STRIDE. Health Psychol. 2007;26:401-9.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Napolitano MA, Whiteley JA, Papandonatos G, et al. Outcomes from the women's wellness project: A community-focused physical activity trial for women. Prev Med. 2006;43:447-53.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Marcus BH, Lewis BA, Williams DM, et al. A comparison of Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:944-9.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Fries E, Edinboro P, McClish D, et al. Randomized trial of a low-intensity dietary intervention in rural residents: The Rural Physician Cancer Prevention Project. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:162-8.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Blair Irvine A, Ary DV, Grove DA, Gilfillan-Morton L. The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia program to influence eating habits. Health Educ Res. 2004;19:290-305.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Kroeze W, Oenema A, Campbell M, Brug J. The efficacy of Web-based and print-delivered computer-tailored interventions to reduce fat intake: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:226-36.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Kroeze W, Oenema A, Dagnelie PC, Brug J. Examining the minimal required elements of a computer-tailored intervention aimed at dietary fat reduction: Results of a randomized controlled dismantling study. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:880-91.PubMedCrossRef
74.
De Bourdeaudhuij I, Stevens V, Vandelanotte C, Brug J. Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:39-48.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Gans KM, Risica PM, Strolla LO, et al. Effectiveness of different methods for delivering tailored nutrition education to low income, ethnically diverse adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:24.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:3-12.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Dutton GR, Napolitano MA, Whiteley JA, Marcus BH. Is physical activity a gateway behavior for diet? Findings from a physical activity trial. Prev Med. 2008;46:216-21.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Nitzke S, Kritsch K, Boeckner L, et al. A stage-tailored multi-modal intervention increases fruit and vegetable intakes of low-income young adults. Am J Health Promot. 2007;22:6-14.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Kreuter MW, Sugg-Skinner C, Holt CL, et al. Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Prev Med. 2005;41:53-62.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Alexander GL, McClure JB, Calvi JH, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:319-26.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Heimendinger J, O'Neill C, Marcus AC, et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the cancer information service. J Health Commun. 2005;10:65-82.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Poddar KH, Hosig KW, Anderson ES, Nickols-Richardson SM, Duncan SE. Web-based nutrition education intervention improves self-efficacy and self-regulation related to increased dairy intake in college students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:1723-7.PubMedCrossRef
83.
The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2009.
84.
Babor TF, Sciamanna CN, Pronk NP. Assessing multiple risk behaviors in primary care. Screening issues and related concepts. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:42-53.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van AP, Glanz K, De Vries H. Computer-tailored nutrition education: Differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:249-56.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172-7.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Harvey-Berino J, Pintauro S, Buzzell P, et al. Does using the Internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:1254-60.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Soureti A, Murray P, Cobain M, Chinapaw M, van MW, Hurling R. Exploratory study of web-based planning and mobile text reminders in an overweight population. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e118.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:622-4.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Davidoff F. Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:66-8.PubMed
91.
McInnes E, Duf L, McClarey M. Challenges in updating a systematic review. Nursing Times Res. 1999;4:66-71.
92.
Stead LF, Lancaster T, Silagy CA. Updating a systematic review--what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:10.PubMedCrossRef
93.
van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. The working mechanisms of an environmentally tailored physical activity intervention for older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009;6.
94.
Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e2.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Jacobs AD, Ammerman AS, Ennett ST, et al. Effects of a Tailored Follow-Up Intervention on Health Behaviors, Beliefs, and Attitudes. Journal of Women's Health. 2004;13:557-68.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Carroll JK, Lewis BA, Marcus BH, Lehman EB, Shaffer ML, Sciamanna CN. Computerized tailored physical activity reports a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:148-56.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Pekmezi DW, Neighbors CJ, Lee CS, et al. A culturally adapted physical activity intervention for Latinas: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:495-500.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J, Vandelanotte C. Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting. Health Educ Res. 2007;22:385-96.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Chinapaw MJ, Slootmaker SM, Schuit AJ. van ZM, van MW. Reliability and validity of the Activity Questionnaire for Adults and Adolescents (AQuAA). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:58.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Liu RD, Buffart LM, Kersten MJ, et al. Psychometric properties of two physical activity questionnaires, the AQuAA and the PASE, in cancer patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:30.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Computer-Tailored Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Promotion Programs: an Update
Authors
Karen Broekhuizen, M.Sc.
Willemieke Kroeze, Ph.D.
Mireille NM van Poppel, Ph.D.
Anke Oenema, Ph.D.
Johannes Brug, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2/2012 Go to the issue

Invited Commentary

Comparing Theories of Health Behavior Using Data from Longitudinal Studies: a Comment on Gerend and Shepherd

Invited Commentary

International Collaborations and Multidisciplinary Approaches in High-Quality Behavioral Medicine Research: a Comment on O’Leary et al

Invited Commentary

Contemplative Practice, Chronic Fatigue, and Telomerase Activity: a Comment on Ho et al.

Original Article

Moderation and Mediation of an Effective HIV Risk-Reduction Intervention for South African Adolescents

Brief Report

Childhood Abuse and Inflammatory Responses to Daily Stressors

Original Article

The Built Environment Moderates Effects of Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment over 2 Years