Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 11/2020

Open Access 01-11-2020 | Computed Tomography | Special Article

The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan

Authors: Koichiro Abe, Makoto Hosono, Takayuki Igarashi, Takashi Iimori, Masanobu Ishiguro, Teruo Ito, Tomomasa Nagahata, Hiroyuki Tsushima, Hiroshi Watanabe

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are one of several effective tools for optimizing nuclear medicine examinations and reducing patient exposure. With the advances in imaging technology and alterations of examination protocols, the DRLs must be reviewed periodically. The first DRLs in Japan were established in 2015, and since 5 years have passed, it is time to review and revise the DRLs. We conducted a survey to investigate the administered activities of radiopharmaceuticals and the radiation doses of computed tomography (CT) in hybrid CT accompanied by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. We distributed a Web-based survey to 915 nuclear medicine facilities throughout Japan and survey responses were provided by 256 nuclear medicine facilities (response rate 28%). We asked for the facility's median actual administered activity and median radiation dose of hybrid CT when SPECT/CT or PET/CT was performed for patients with standard habitus in the standard protocol of the facility for each nuclear medicine examination. We determined the new DRLs based on the 75th percentile referring to the 2015 DRLs, drug package inserts, and updated guidelines. The 2020 DRLs are almost the same as the 2015 DRLs, but for the relatively long-lived radionuclides, the DRLs are set low due to the changes in the Japanese delivery system. There are no items set higher than the previous values. Although the DRLs determined this time are roughly equivalent to the DRLs used in the US, overall they tend to be higher than the European DRLs. The DRLs of the radiation dose of CT in hybrid CT vary widely depending on each imaging site and the purpose of the examination.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 26. Ann ICRP. 1977;1(3):1–80.CrossRef International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 26. Ann ICRP. 1977;1(3):1–80.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rehani MM, Kushi JF. A study of smart card for radiation exposure history of patient. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:780–2.CrossRef Rehani MM, Kushi JF. A study of smart card for radiation exposure history of patient. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:780–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG, Fisher ES, Hillier MC, Kendall GM, Harrison RM. A national survey of doses to patients undergoing a selection of routine X-ray examinations in English hospitals. National Radiological Protection Board. NRPB-R200, 1986. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Jones DG, Fisher ES, Hillier MC, Kendall GM, Harrison RM. A national survey of doses to patients undergoing a selection of routine X-ray examinations in English hospitals. National Radiological Protection Board. NRPB-R200, 1986.
4.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):1–201. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):1–201.
5.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP publication 73. Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2):1–47.CrossRef International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. ICRP publication 73. Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2):1–47.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):1–332.
7.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Diagnostic reference levels of medical imaging. ICRP publication 135. Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1):1–143.CrossRef International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Diagnostic reference levels of medical imaging. ICRP publication 135. Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1):1–143.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vassileva J, Rehani M. Diagnostic reference levels. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W1–W3.CrossRef Vassileva J, Rehani M. Diagnostic reference levels. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W1–W3.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Watanabe H, Ishii K, Hosono M, Imabayashi E, Abe K, Inubushi M, Ohno K, Magata Y, Ono K, Kikuchi K, Wagatsuma K, Takase T, Saito K, Takahashi Y. Report of a nationwide survey on actual administered radioactivities of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic reference levels in Japan. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:435–44.CrossRef Watanabe H, Ishii K, Hosono M, Imabayashi E, Abe K, Inubushi M, Ohno K, Magata Y, Ono K, Kikuchi K, Wagatsuma K, Takase T, Saito K, Takahashi Y. Report of a nationwide survey on actual administered radioactivities of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic reference levels in Japan. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:435–44.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, Optimization Committee for Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Studies, Koizumi K, Masaki H, Matsuda H, Uchiyama M, Okuno M, Oguma E, Onuma H, Kanegawa K, Kanaya S, Kamiyama H, Karasawa K, Kitamura M, Kida T, Kono T, Kondo C, Sasaki M, Terada H, Nakanishi A, Hashimoto T, Hataya H, Hamano S-I, Hirono K, Fujita Y, Hoshino K, Yano M, Watanabe S. Japanese consensus guidelines for pediatric nuclear medicine. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:498–503.CrossRef The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, Optimization Committee for Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Studies, Koizumi K, Masaki H, Matsuda H, Uchiyama M, Okuno M, Oguma E, Onuma H, Kanegawa K, Kanaya S, Kamiyama H, Karasawa K, Kitamura M, Kida T, Kono T, Kondo C, Sasaki M, Terada H, Nakanishi A, Hashimoto T, Hataya H, Hamano S-I, Hirono K, Fujita Y, Hoshino K, Yano M, Watanabe S. Japanese consensus guidelines for pediatric nuclear medicine. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:498–503.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Becker MD, Butler PF, Siam M, Gress DA, Ghesani M, Harkness BA, Yoo DC, Oates MEUS. PET/CT and gamma camera diagnostic reference levels and achievable administered activities for noncardiac nuclear medicine studies. Radiology. 2019;293:203–11.CrossRef Becker MD, Butler PF, Siam M, Gress DA, Ghesani M, Harkness BA, Yoo DC, Oates MEUS. PET/CT and gamma camera diagnostic reference levels and achievable administered activities for noncardiac nuclear medicine studies. Radiology. 2019;293:203–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Iball GR, Bebbington NA, Burniston M, Edyvean S, Fraser L, Julyan P, Parkar N, Wood T. A national survey of computed tomography doses in hybrid PET-CT and SPECT-CT examinations in the UK. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:459–70.CrossRef Iball GR, Bebbington NA, Burniston M, Edyvean S, Fraser L, Julyan P, Parkar N, Wood T. A national survey of computed tomography doses in hybrid PET-CT and SPECT-CT examinations in the UK. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:459–70.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gardner M, Katsidzira NM, Ross E, Larkin EA. Patient dosimetry audit for establishing local diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine CT. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:2160850.CrossRef Gardner M, Katsidzira NM, Ross E, Larkin EA. Patient dosimetry audit for establishing local diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine CT. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:2160850.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alkhybari EM, McEntee MF, Brennan PC, Willowson KP, Hogg P, Kench PL. Determining and updating PET/CT and SPECT/CT diagnostic reference levels: a systematic review. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2018;182:532–45.CrossRef Alkhybari EM, McEntee MF, Brennan PC, Willowson KP, Hogg P, Kench PL. Determining and updating PET/CT and SPECT/CT diagnostic reference levels: a systematic review. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2018;182:532–45.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alessio AM, Farrell MB, Fahey FH. Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: a report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1960–4.CrossRef Alessio AM, Farrell MB, Fahey FH. Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: a report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1960–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rehani MM. Limitations of diagnostic reference level (DRL) and introduction of acceptable quality dose (AQD). Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20140344.CrossRef Rehani MM. Limitations of diagnostic reference level (DRL) and introduction of acceptable quality dose (AQD). Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20140344.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan
Authors
Koichiro Abe
Makoto Hosono
Takayuki Igarashi
Takashi Iimori
Masanobu Ishiguro
Teruo Ito
Tomomasa Nagahata
Hiroyuki Tsushima
Hiroshi Watanabe
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01512-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 11/2020 Go to the issue