Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2018

Open Access 01-02-2018 | Research Article

Characteristics of adverse drug reactions in a vemurafenib early post-marketing phase vigilance study in Japan

Authors: H. Uhara, Y. Kiyohara, A. Tsuda, M. Takata, N. Yamazaki

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Post-approval research or monitoring is important to determine real-world safety of new products; however, evidence is scant for vemurafenib in Japanese patients. In Japan, a unique system is officially obligated to investigate post-approval safety. Here we report the first adverse drug reaction (ADR) data from vemurafenib-treated Japanese patients with metastatic melanoma. Data were collected in an early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV) study.

Methods

ADRs were events for which a causal relationship with vemurafenib could not be ruled out or was unknown. ADR data were collected for patients treated with vemurafenib (960 mg bid) between 26 February and 25 August 2015.

Results

Among 95 patients, 46 patients had 118 ADRs (24 serious ADRs in 13 patients). The most common serious ADRs were hypersensitivity (n = 1; 3 events), arthralgia (n = 2; 2 events), pyrexia (n = 2; 2 events) and drug eruption (n = 2; 2 events). Seven patients had serious skin disorders or hypersensitivity, six of whom had prior anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies 5–35 days before starting vemurafenib. ADR reports of serious skin disorders appeared to be collected more rapidly than previously reported. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma developed in only one patient.

Conclusions

EPPV in Japanese vemurafenib-treated patients identified no new safety signals. The most serious skin and hypersensitivity ADRs occurred in patients with prior anti-PD-1 exposure. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma appeared to be rare in Japanese patients. Further research is needed to clarify whether prior treatment with anti-PD-1 agents or racial differences affect the characteristic profile of cutaneous ADRs in Japanese patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ishihara K, Saida T, Yamamoto A, Japanese Skin Cancer Society Prognosis and Statistical Investigation Committee. Updated statistical data for malignant melanoma in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2001;6:109–16.CrossRefPubMed Ishihara K, Saida T, Yamamoto A, Japanese Skin Cancer Society Prognosis and Statistical Investigation Committee. Updated statistical data for malignant melanoma in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2001;6:109–16.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ishihara K, Saida T, Otsuka F, Yamazaki N, Prognosis and Statistical Investigation Committee of the Japanese Skin Cancer Society. Statistical profiles of malignant melanoma and other skin cancers in Japan: 2007 update. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:33–41.CrossRefPubMed Ishihara K, Saida T, Otsuka F, Yamazaki N, Prognosis and Statistical Investigation Committee of the Japanese Skin Cancer Society. Statistical profiles of malignant melanoma and other skin cancers in Japan: 2007 update. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13:33–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Katanoda K, Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Nishino Y, Hattori M, et al. An updated report on the trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Japan, 1958–2013. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:390–401.CrossRefPubMed Katanoda K, Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Nishino Y, Hattori M, et al. An updated report on the trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Japan, 1958–2013. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:390–401.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sakaizawa K, Ashida A, Uchiyama A, Ito T, Fujisawa Y, Ogata D, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations in Japanese melanoma patients. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;80:33–7.CrossRefPubMed Sakaizawa K, Ashida A, Uchiyama A, Ito T, Fujisawa Y, Ogata D, et al. Clinical characteristics associated with BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations in Japanese melanoma patients. J Dermatol Sci. 2015;80:33–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yamazaki N, Tanaka R, Tsutsumida A, Namikawa K, Eguchi H, Omata W, et al. BRAF V600 mutations and pathological features in Japanese melanoma patients. Melanoma Res. 2015;25:9–14.CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki N, Tanaka R, Tsutsumida A, Namikawa K, Eguchi H, Omata W, et al. BRAF V600 mutations and pathological features in Japanese melanoma patients. Melanoma Res. 2015;25:9–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mouawad R, Sebert M, Michels J, Bloch J, Spano JP, Khayat D. Treatment for metastatic malignant melanoma: old drugs and new strategies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;74:27–39.CrossRefPubMed Mouawad R, Sebert M, Michels J, Bloch J, Spano JP, Khayat D. Treatment for metastatic malignant melanoma: old drugs and new strategies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010;74:27–39.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim G, McKee AE, Ning YM, Hazarika M, Theoret M, Johnson JR, et al. FDA approval summary: vemurafenib for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4994–5000.CrossRefPubMed Kim G, McKee AE, Ning YM, Hazarika M, Theoret M, Johnson JR, et al. FDA approval summary: vemurafenib for treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with the BRAFV600E mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4994–5000.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Dréno B, Atkinson V, Liszkay G, Maio M, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1867–76.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Dréno B, Atkinson V, Liszkay G, Maio M, et al. Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1867–76.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Kefford RF, Sosman J, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1694–703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Kefford RF, Sosman J, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1694–703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Imafuku K, Yoshino K, Ishiwata K, Otobe S, Tsuboi S, Ohara K, Hata H. Severe rash associated with vemurafenib administration following nivolumab therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:e84–6.CrossRefPubMed Imafuku K, Yoshino K, Ishiwata K, Otobe S, Tsuboi S, Ohara K, Hata H. Severe rash associated with vemurafenib administration following nivolumab therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:e84–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Larkin J, Del Vecchio M, Ascierto PA, Krajsova I, Schachter J, Neyns B, et al. Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600) mutated metastatic melanoma: an open-label, multicentre, safety study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:436–44.CrossRefPubMed Larkin J, Del Vecchio M, Ascierto PA, Krajsova I, Schachter J, Neyns B, et al. Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600) mutated metastatic melanoma: an open-label, multicentre, safety study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:436–44.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shailesh FN, Singh M, Tiwari U, Hutchins LF. Vemurafenib-induced bilateral facial palsy. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60:187–8.CrossRefPubMed Shailesh FN, Singh M, Tiwari U, Hutchins LF. Vemurafenib-induced bilateral facial palsy. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60:187–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Klein O, Ribas A, Chmielowski B, Walker G, Clements A, Long GV, Kefford RF. Facial palsy as a side effect of vemurafenib treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:e215–7.CrossRefPubMed Klein O, Ribas A, Chmielowski B, Walker G, Clements A, Long GV, Kefford RF. Facial palsy as a side effect of vemurafenib treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:e215–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, et al. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:707–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, et al. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:707–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference McArthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Dummer R, et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:323–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McArthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Dummer R, et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:323–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of adverse drug reactions in a vemurafenib early post-marketing phase vigilance study in Japan
Authors
H. Uhara
Y. Kiyohara
A. Tsuda
M. Takata
N. Yamazaki
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1706-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine