Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Research Article

MRI-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: initial clinical experience

Authors: A. M. Chen, S. Hsu, J. Lamb, Y. Yang, N. Agazaryan, M. L. Steinberg, D. A. Low, M. Cao

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To report a single-institutional experience with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy for cancers of the head and neck.

Materials and methods

Between October 2014 and October 2016, 18 patients with newly diagnosed cancers of the head and neck were prospectively enrolled on an institutional registry trial investigating the feasibility and efficacy of external-beam radiotherapy delivered using on-board MRI. All patients had biopsy-proven evidence of malignancy, measurable disease, and the ability to provide consent. None had previously received any treatment. Median dose was 70 Gy (range 54–70 Gy). MRI scans were obtained as part of an image-guided registration protocol for alignment prior to and during each treatment. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 14 patients (78%). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the University of Washington quality of life instrument.

Results

Seventeen of 18 patients completed the planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment of which 15 (83%) had a complete response and 2 (11%) had a partial response based on initial post-therapy positron emission tomography (PET) at 3 months. The 1-year estimates of progression-free survival, overall survival, and local–regional control were 95, 96, and 95%, respectively. There were no treatment-related fatalities. The incidence of grade 3+ acute toxicity was 44%. The proportion of patients rating their health-related quality of life as “very good” or “outstanding” at 6 months and 1 year after completion of radiation therapy was 60 and 70%, respectively.

Conclusions

MRI-guided radiotherapy achieves clinical outcomes comparable to contemporary series reporting on IMRT for head and neck cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bostel T, Nicolay NH, Grossman JG, et al. MR-guidance—a clinical study to evaluate a shuttle-based MR-linac connection to provide MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bostel T, Nicolay NH, Grossman JG, et al. MR-guidance—a clinical study to evaluate a shuttle-based MR-linac connection to provide MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. France: Springer; 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. France: Springer; 2010.
3.
go back to reference Hu Y, Rankine L, Green OL, et al. Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system. Med Phys. 2015;42:5828–37.CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Rankine L, Green OL, et al. Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system. Med Phys. 2015;42:5828–37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Li HH, Rodriquez V, Green OL, et al. Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35 T-lateral magnetic field. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:65–72.CrossRefPubMed Li HH, Rodriquez V, Green OL, et al. Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35 T-lateral magnetic field. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:65–72.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wooten HO, Rodriquez V, Green O, et al. Benchmark IMRT evaluation of a Co-60 MRI guided radiation therapy system. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114:402–5.CrossRefPubMed Wooten HO, Rodriquez V, Green O, et al. Benchmark IMRT evaluation of a Co-60 MRI guided radiation therapy system. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114:402–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yang Y, Cao M, Sheng K, et al. Longitudinal diffusion MRI for treatment response assessment: preliminary experience using an MRI-guided tri-cobalt 60 radiotherapy system. Med Phys. 2016;43:1369–73.CrossRefPubMed Yang Y, Cao M, Sheng K, et al. Longitudinal diffusion MRI for treatment response assessment: preliminary experience using an MRI-guided tri-cobalt 60 radiotherapy system. Med Phys. 2016;43:1369–73.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993;15:485–96.CrossRefPubMed Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993;15:485–96.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wooten HO, Green O, Yang M, et al. Quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans using a 60-cobalt magnetic resonance imaging guidance therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:771–8.CrossRefPubMed Wooten HO, Green O, Yang M, et al. Quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans using a 60-cobalt magnetic resonance imaging guidance therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:771–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Tran BN, Cengiz M, Dempsey JF, Low DA. Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:312–21.CrossRefPubMed Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Tran BN, Cengiz M, Dempsey JF, Low DA. Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:312–21.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee N, Xia P, Fischbein NJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:49–60.CrossRefPubMed Lee N, Xia P, Fischbein NJ, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:49–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yao M, Dornfeld KJ, Buatti JM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma—the University of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:410–21.CrossRefPubMed Yao M, Dornfeld KJ, Buatti JM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma—the University of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:410–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chin AL, Lin A, Anamalayil S, Teo BK. Feasibility and limitations of bulk density assignment in MRI for head and neck IMRT treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:15.CrossRef Chin AL, Lin A, Anamalayil S, Teo BK. Feasibility and limitations of bulk density assignment in MRI for head and neck IMRT treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:15.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Karotki A, Mah K, Meijer G, Meltsner M. Comparison of bulk electron density and voxel-based electron density treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:3522.CrossRefPubMed Karotki A, Mah K, Meijer G, Meltsner M. Comparison of bulk electron density and voxel-based electron density treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:3522.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Weygand J, Fuller CD, Ibbot GS, et al. Spatial precision in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: the role of geometric distortion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:1304–16.CrossRefPubMed Weygand J, Fuller CD, Ibbot GS, et al. Spatial precision in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: the role of geometric distortion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:1304–16.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liao XB, Mao YP, Liu LZ, et al. How does magnetic resonance imaging influence staging according to AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with computed tomography? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1368–77.CrossRefPubMed Liao XB, Mao YP, Liu LZ, et al. How does magnetic resonance imaging influence staging according to AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with computed tomography? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1368–77.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hansen EK, Bucci MK, Quivey JM, et al. Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:355–62.CrossRefPubMed Hansen EK, Bucci MK, Quivey JM, et al. Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:355–62.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Barker JL, Garden AS, Ang KK, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:960–70.CrossRefPubMed Barker JL, Garden AS, Ang KK, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:960–70.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rwigema JC, Thomas DH, Cao M, Yoshizaki T, Chen AM. Intrafraction organ motion tracking with real-time MRI-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(4):878.CrossRef Rwigema JC, Thomas DH, Cao M, Yoshizaki T, Chen AM. Intrafraction organ motion tracking with real-time MRI-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94(4):878.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schouten CS, de Graaf P, Alberts FM, et al. Response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy for advanced nodal disease in head and neck cancer using diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET-CT. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:541–7.CrossRefPubMed Schouten CS, de Graaf P, Alberts FM, et al. Response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy for advanced nodal disease in head and neck cancer using diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET-CT. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:541–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chen Y, Liu X, Zheng D, et al. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:630–7.CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Liu X, Zheng D, et al. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:630–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Matoba M, Tuji H, Shimode Y, et al. Fractional change in apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker for predicting treatment response in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neurodiol. 2014;35:379–85.CrossRef Matoba M, Tuji H, Shimode Y, et al. Fractional change in apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker for predicting treatment response in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neurodiol. 2014;35:379–85.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chen AM, Daly ME, Cui J, Mathai M, Benedict S, Purdy JA. Clinical outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without adaptive replanning. Head Neck. 2014;36:1541–6.CrossRefPubMed Chen AM, Daly ME, Cui J, Mathai M, Benedict S, Purdy JA. Clinical outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy with and without adaptive replanning. Head Neck. 2014;36:1541–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Schwartz DL, Garden AS, Thomas J, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial clinical outcomes from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:986–93.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz DL, Garden AS, Thomas J, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: initial clinical outcomes from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:986–93.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Raghavan G, Kishan AU, Cao M, Chen AM. Anatomic and dosimetric changes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with an integrated MRI-tri-60Co teletherapy device. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20160624.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raghavan G, Kishan AU, Cao M, Chen AM. Anatomic and dosimetric changes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with an integrated MRI-tri-60Co teletherapy device. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20160624.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
MRI-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: initial clinical experience
Authors
A. M. Chen
S. Hsu
J. Lamb
Y. Yang
N. Agazaryan
M. L. Steinberg
D. A. Low
M. Cao
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1704-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine