Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Research Article

Germline BRCA testing is moving from cancer risk assessment to a predictive biomarker for targeting cancer therapeutics

Authors: L. Moreno, C. Linossi, I. Esteban, N. Gadea, E. Carrasco, S. Bonache, S. Gutiérrez-Enríquez, C. Cruz, O. Díez, J. Balmaña

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Originally, BRCA testing was used for risk assessment and prevention strategies for breast and ovarian cancer. Nowadays, BRCA status may influence therapeutic decision making at cancer diagnosis. Our objective was to analyze whether the medical advances have changed the burden and pattern of referral, and the pathogenic mutation detection rate.

Methods

We included 969 probands from our hereditary cancer registry who undertook a full BRCA analysis between 2006 and 2014. Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables.

Results

The number of genetic tests have raised from 28 to 170, representing a sixfold increase. In 2006, we tested 1.6 relatives/proband while this proportion was four in 2014. Overall, 20 % harbored a deleterious mutation and 11 % had a variant of unknown significance (VUS). There has been a downward trend in the detection rate of VUS. Testing patients with breast cancer during neoadjuvancy has raised from 4 to 25 % (p = 0.002), while testing them during remission has decreased from 79 to 29 % (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients assessed during the first 6 months after their cancer diagnosis has increased from 3 to 34 % (p = 0.001). Risk reducing mastectomy and salpingoophorectomy have raised from 0 to 24 %, and from 36 to 65 %, respectively.

Conclusions

BRCA testing has experienced a sixfold increase, the number of relatives being tested has doubled, and the test is being performed at earlier phases of the disease. It is necessary to adequate the health resources to preserve the BRCA genetic counseling quality while incorporating BRCA testing for therapeutic decision making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266(5182):66–71.CrossRefPubMed Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266(5182):66–71.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tavtigian SV, Simard J, Rommens J, Couch F, Shattuck-Eidens D, Neuhausen S, et al. The complete BRCA2 gene and mutations in chromosome 13q-linked kindreds. Nat Genet. 1996;12(3):333–7. doi:10.1038/ng0396-333.CrossRefPubMed Tavtigian SV, Simard J, Rommens J, Couch F, Shattuck-Eidens D, Neuhausen S, et al. The complete BRCA2 gene and mutations in chromosome 13q-linked kindreds. Nat Genet. 1996;12(3):333–7. doi:10.​1038/​ng0396-333.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ford D, Easton FD, Stratton M, Narod SA, Goldgar DE, Devilee P, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:14.CrossRef Ford D, Easton FD, Stratton M, Narod SA, Goldgar DE, Devilee P, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eccles DM, Evans DG, Mackay J. Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2000;37:7.CrossRef Eccles DM, Evans DG, Mackay J. Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet. 2000;37:7.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Berliner JL, Fay AM. Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2007;16(3):19.CrossRef Berliner JL, Fay AM. Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2007;16(3):19.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bradbury AR, Olopade O. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2007;8(3):12.CrossRef Bradbury AR, Olopade O. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2007;8(3):12.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA mutation carriers with MRI, ultrasound, mammography and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292(11):9.CrossRef Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA mutation carriers with MRI, ultrasound, mammography and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292(11):9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, van ‘t Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1055–62. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.04.188.CrossRefPubMed Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, van ‘t Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1055–62. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​04.​188.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/Familial high-risk assessment: Breast and Ovarian, V.2.2015. Washington (DC): NCCN; 2015. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/Familial high-risk assessment: Breast and Ovarian, V.2.2015. Washington (DC): NCCN; 2015.
11.
go back to reference Balmana J, Diez O, Rubio IT, Cardoso F, Group EGW. BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(Suppl 6):31–4. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr373. Balmana J, Diez O, Rubio IT, Cardoso F, Group EGW. BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(Suppl 6):31–4. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdr373.
12.
go back to reference Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):7.CrossRef Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(21):7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, Kurian AW, Lipson JA, Flaherty PJ, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1895–901. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Telli ML, Jensen KC, Vinayak S, Kurian AW, Lipson JA, Flaherty PJ, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and iniparib as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer with assessment of a tumor-based measure of genomic instability: PrECOG 0105. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(17):1895–901. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​57.​0085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, Ellis S, Platte R, Fineberg E, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):812–22. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt095.CrossRefPubMed Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, Ellis S, Platte R, Fineberg E, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):812–22. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djt095.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Malone KE, Begg CB, Haile RW, Borg A, Concannon P, Tellhed L, et al. Population-Based study of the risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):6.CrossRef Malone KE, Begg CB, Haile RW, Borg A, Concannon P, Tellhed L, et al. Population-Based study of the risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):12.CrossRef Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, Tutt A, Wu P, Mergui-Roelvink M, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):12.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Audeh MW, Carmichael J, Penson RT, Friedlander M, Powell B, Bell-McGuinn KM, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):245–51. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60893-8.CrossRefPubMed Audeh MW, Carmichael J, Penson RT, Friedlander M, Powell B, Bell-McGuinn KM, et al. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9737):245–51. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(10)60893-8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, Friedlander M, Vergote I, Rustin G, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):9. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70228-1.CrossRef Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, Friedlander M, Vergote I, Rustin G, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):9. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70228-1.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmana J, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2728. Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, Audeh MW, Friedlander M, Balmana J, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​56.​2728.
23.
go back to reference Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, deFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2654–63. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, deFazio A, Emmanuel C, George J, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2654–63. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2011.​39.​8545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Couch FJ, Hart SN, Sharma P, Toland AE, Wang X, Miron P, et al. Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(4):304–11. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1414.CrossRefPubMed Couch FJ, Hart SN, Sharma P, Toland AE, Wang X, Miron P, et al. Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(4):304–11. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​57.​1414.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hartman AR, Kaldate RR, Sailer LM, Painter L, Grier CE, Endsley RR, et al. Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(11):2787–95. doi:10.1002/cncr.26576.CrossRefPubMed Hartman AR, Kaldate RR, Sailer LM, Painter L, Grier CE, Endsley RR, et al. Prevalence of BRCA mutations in an unselected population of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(11):2787–95. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​26576.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Evans DG, Barwell J, Eccles D, Collins A, Izatt L, Jacobs C, et al. The Angelina Jolie Effect: how high celebrity profile can have major impact provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:6.CrossRef Evans DG, Barwell J, Eccles D, Collins A, Izatt L, Jacobs C, et al. The Angelina Jolie Effect: how high celebrity profile can have major impact provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Diez O, Gutierrez-Enriquez S, Masas M, Tenes A, Yague C, Arcusa A, et al. Identification of a new complex deleterious mutation in exon 18 of the BRCA2 gene in a hereditary male/female breast cancer family. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):587–90. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0830-2.CrossRefPubMed Diez O, Gutierrez-Enriquez S, Masas M, Tenes A, Yague C, Arcusa A, et al. Identification of a new complex deleterious mutation in exon 18 of the BRCA2 gene in a hereditary male/female breast cancer family. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):587–90. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-010-0830-2.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, Hogervorst FB, Monteiro AN, Nathanson KL, et al. ENIGMA–evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):2–7. doi:10.1002/humu.21628.CrossRefPubMed Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, Hogervorst FB, Monteiro AN, Nathanson KL, et al. ENIGMA–evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):2–7. doi:10.​1002/​humu.​21628.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Germline BRCA testing is moving from cancer risk assessment to a predictive biomarker for targeting cancer therapeutics
Authors
L. Moreno
C. Linossi
I. Esteban
N. Gadea
E. Carrasco
S. Bonache
S. Gutiérrez-Enríquez
C. Cruz
O. Díez
J. Balmaña
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1470-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Clinical and Translational Oncology 10/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine