Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Research Article

Paediatric tumour boards in Spain: a national survey

Authors: P. Berlanga, V. Segura, A. Juan Ribelles, P. Sánchez de Toledo, T. Acha, V. Castel, A. Cañete

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) are conducted worldwide for the management of patients with cancer, and they deliver a higher standard of care by simultaneously involving different specialists in diagnosis and treatment planning. However, information of paediatric MDTs functioning is scarce. A pilot study was conducted in Spain in the frame of the European Expert Paediatric Oncology Reference Network for Diagnostics and Treatment (ExPO-r-Net).

Methods

A specific questionnaire was designed regarding various features of MDT practice. Data collected included information on the centres and the team, infrastructure for meetings, MDT organization/logistics and clinical decision-making. The survey was distributed to all Paediatric Oncology Units that register patients in the Spanish Registry of Childhood Tumours (RETI-SEHOP).

Results

32 out of 43 contacted centres responded the questionnaire (74 % response rate; 88 % response rate for centres with >25 new patients/year). All units with >25 new patients/year have a dedicated Paediatric MDT compared to 76 % of units with ≤25 new patients/year. MDTs should be improved at institutional level by clear protected time in service planning for all specialists involved, incentives for attendance and attendance registration. Clinical decision-making process and follow-up of recommendation adherence should be assessed and potential legal responsibilities for physicians participating in Tumour Board defined. Network collaboration through virtual MDTs, using available videoconferencing tools, is an opportunity to share expertise among centres.
Literature
1.
go back to reference El Saghir NS, Keating NL, Carlson RW, Khoury KE, Fallowfield L. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014; e461–e466. El Saghir NS, Keating NL, Carlson RW, Khoury KE, Fallowfield L. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014; e461–e466.
2.
go back to reference Brar SS, Hong NL, Wright FC. Multidisciplinary cancer care: does it improve outcomes? J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:494–9.CrossRefPubMed Brar SS, Hong NL, Wright FC. Multidisciplinary cancer care: does it improve outcomes? J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:494–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF. Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:125–34.CrossRefPubMed Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF. Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:125–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Standards for Pediatric Cancer Centers. Hematology/oncology so. Pediatrics. 2014;134:410–4.CrossRef Standards for Pediatric Cancer Centers. Hematology/oncology so. Pediatrics. 2014;134:410–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Peris Bonet R, Felipe García S, Martínez Ruiz N, Pardo Romaguera E, Valero Poveda S. Cáncer infantil en España. Estadísticas 1980–2012. Registro Nacional de Tumores Infantiles (RNTI-SEHOP). Valencia: Universitat de València. 2013 (Prelimilary issue in CD-ROM). http://www.uv.es/rnti. Peris Bonet R, Felipe García S, Martínez Ruiz N, Pardo Romaguera E, Valero Poveda S. Cáncer infantil en España. Estadísticas 1980–2012. Registro Nacional de Tumores Infantiles (RNTI-SEHOP). Valencia: Universitat de València. 2013 (Prelimilary issue in CD-ROM). http://​www.​uv.​es/​rnti.
9.
go back to reference Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D, Davis D, McLeod RS, Gagliardi AR. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2731–7.CrossRefPubMed Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D, Davis D, McLeod RS, Gagliardi AR. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2731–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference NICE. Guidance on cancer services—improving outcomes in children and young people with cancer. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005. NICE. Guidance on cancer services—improving outcomes in children and young people with cancer. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005.
11.
go back to reference Kowalczyk JR, Samardakiewicz M, Fitzgerald E, Essiaf S, Ladenstein R, Vassal G, et al. Towards reducing inequalities: European standards of care for children with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:481–5.CrossRefPubMed Kowalczyk JR, Samardakiewicz M, Fitzgerald E, Essiaf S, Ladenstein R, Vassal G, et al. Towards reducing inequalities: European standards of care for children with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:481–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1002–10.CrossRefPubMed Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1002–10.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Anderson MA, Davis D. The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27:214–9.CrossRefPubMed Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Anderson MA, Davis D. The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27:214–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sidhom MA, Poulsen M. Group decisions in oncology: doctors’ perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:287–92.CrossRefPubMed Sidhom MA, Poulsen M. Group decisions in oncology: doctors’ perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:287–92.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sidhom MA, Poulsen MG. Multidisciplinary care in oncology: medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:951–4.CrossRefPubMed Sidhom MA, Poulsen MG. Multidisciplinary care in oncology: medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:951–4.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116–25.CrossRefPubMed Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116–25.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Green JS. Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1759–65.CrossRefPubMed Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Green JS. Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1759–65.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jalil R, Akhter W, Lamb BW, Taylor C, Harris J, Green JS, et al. Validation of team performance assessment of multidisciplinary tumor boards. J Urol. 2014;192:891–8.CrossRefPubMed Jalil R, Akhter W, Lamb BW, Taylor C, Harris J, Green JS, et al. Validation of team performance assessment of multidisciplinary tumor boards. J Urol. 2014;192:891–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Shah S, Arora S, Atkin G, Glynne-Jones R, Mathur P, Darzi A, et al. Decision-making in Colorectal Cancer Tumor Board meetings: results of a prospective observational assessment. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2783–8.CrossRefPubMed Shah S, Arora S, Atkin G, Glynne-Jones R, Mathur P, Darzi A, et al. Decision-making in Colorectal Cancer Tumor Board meetings: results of a prospective observational assessment. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2783–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Paediatric tumour boards in Spain: a national survey
Authors
P. Berlanga
V. Segura
A. Juan Ribelles
P. Sánchez de Toledo
T. Acha
V. Castel
A. Cañete
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1466-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Clinical and Translational Oncology 9/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine