Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

The Reliability of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Sensor for Intra- and Intersession Measurements

Authors: Roopa G. Manjunatha, Surya Prakash, Konandur Rajanna

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

A new nasal sensor has been designed using Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) film using its piezoelectric property to measure nasal patency. The aim of this study is to determine the intra- and intersession reliability of the new PVDF nasal sensor measurement of unilateral and combined nasal parameters in a group of healthy subjects. Two identical nasal sensors: for right nostril (RN) and left nostril (LN) were designed using piezoelectric natured PVDF films. Twenty subjects were studied. To evaluate the repeatability, total three sets of PVDF sensor measurements were recorded, two sets were taken 5 min apart during same session without repositioning the PVDF nasal sensors and two more sets were taken during 1 h apart successively, by repositioning the PVDF nasal sensor. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of PVDF sensor measurements for intra- and intersession showed a high and greater repeatability over time for all the combined (mean) and unilateral (RN and LN) values. In both healthy and patients, ICC values for both intra- and intersession measurements were ≥ 0.80 confirming strong reliability and also almost all of the coefficients of variation for the same parameters were low (below 10%). PVDF sensor measurements showed good intra- and intersession repeatability and can be recommended for the objective monitoring of nasal patency during diagnosis and follow-up of conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scadding G, Hellings P, Alobid I, Bachert C, Fokkens W, van Wijk RG et al (2011) Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper. Clin Transl Allergy 1:2CrossRef Scadding G, Hellings P, Alobid I, Bachert C, Fokkens W, van Wijk RG et al (2011) Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper. Clin Transl Allergy 1:2CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66(1):295–303CrossRef Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66(1):295–303CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kern EB (1981) Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rinology 19(4):231–236 Kern EB (1981) Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rinology 19(4):231–236
4.
go back to reference Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR (1993) Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal peak flow rate. Clin Otolaringol 18(1):19–22CrossRef Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR (1993) Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal peak flow rate. Clin Otolaringol 18(1):19–22CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chaaban M, Jacquelynne PC (2011) Assessing nasal air flow: options and utility. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8:70–78CrossRef Chaaban M, Jacquelynne PC (2011) Assessing nasal air flow: options and utility. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8:70–78CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pallanch JF, Mccaffrey TV, Kern EB (1993) Evaluation of nasal breathing function. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harher LA, Krause CJ, Shuller DE (eds) Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 1–59 Pallanch JF, Mccaffrey TV, Kern EB (1993) Evaluation of nasal breathing function. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harher LA, Krause CJ, Shuller DE (eds) Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 1–59
7.
go back to reference Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Lai V (1997) A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(4):349–354CrossRef Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Lai V (1997) A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(4):349–354CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Silkoff PE, Chakravorty S, Chapnik J, Cole P, Zamel N (1999) Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Am J Rhinol 13(2):131–135CrossRef Silkoff PE, Chakravorty S, Chapnik J, Cole P, Zamel N (1999) Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Am J Rhinol 13(2):131–135CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Cain J, Batra PS, Luong A (2010) Com-parison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(2):290–293CrossRef Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Cain J, Batra PS, Luong A (2010) Com-parison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(2):290–293CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Al Ahmari MD, Wedzicha JA, Hurst JR (2012) Intersession repeatability of acoustic rhinometry measurements in healthy volunteers. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 5(3):156–160CrossRef Al Ahmari MD, Wedzicha JA, Hurst JR (2012) Intersession repeatability of acoustic rhinometry measurements in healthy volunteers. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 5(3):156–160CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kawai H (1969) The piezoelectric of polyvinylidene fluoride. Jpn J Appl Phys 8(7):975–976CrossRef Kawai H (1969) The piezoelectric of polyvinylidene fluoride. Jpn J Appl Phys 8(7):975–976CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Manjunatha RG, Rajanna K, Mahapatra DR, Prakash S (2014) Evaluation of polyvinylidene fluoride nasal sensor to assess deviated nasal septum in comparison with peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28(1):e62–e67CrossRef Manjunatha RG, Rajanna K, Mahapatra DR, Prakash S (2014) Evaluation of polyvinylidene fluoride nasal sensor to assess deviated nasal septum in comparison with peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28(1):e62–e67CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Starling-Schwanz R, Peake HL, Salome CM, Toelle BG, Ng KW, Marks GB, Lean ML, Rimmer SJ (2005) Repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing the severity of rhinitis. Allergy 60(6):795–800CrossRef Starling-Schwanz R, Peake HL, Salome CM, Toelle BG, Ng KW, Marks GB, Lean ML, Rimmer SJ (2005) Repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing the severity of rhinitis. Allergy 60(6):795–800CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Reliability of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Sensor for Intra- and Intersession Measurements
Authors
Roopa G. Manjunatha
Surya Prakash
Konandur Rajanna
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1349-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2019 Go to the issue