Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 1/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Paper

Phase I pilot study of oxaliplatin, infusional 5-FU, and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

Authors: Joseph I. Clark, Joshua B. Greene, Ann Lau Clark, Jay S. Dalal, Craig C. Hofmeister

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Platinum-based therapy is active in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC have a poor prognosis; many have difficulty tolerating cisplatin-based regimens. Oxaliplatin has antitumor activity without many of the toxicities of cisplatin. We conducted a phase I pilot study to investigate the dose limitation of oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab in patients with untreated recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. The planned dose escalation schedule included: dose level 1: oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU CIV 750 mg/m2/day over 96 h beginning day 1, and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 day 1 (then 250 mg/m2 weekly) every 21 days. Dose level 2: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1, 5-FU CIV 1,000 mg/m2/day over 96 h beginning day 1, and the same dose and schedule of cetuximab. Seven patients were accrued at dose level 1 and three at dose level 2. Dose level 1 toxicity included grade 1–2 stomatitis, fatigue, acneiform rash, and anemia, and grade 1 nausea and transaminitis. Dose level 2 toxicity was unacceptable: 2 of 3 patients experienced grade 4 toxicities (stomatitis, diarrhea, and acute renal failure) requiring hospitalization with one treatment-related death. Accrual was therefore closed with dose level 1 considered the maximum tolerated dose. Observed responses were short-lived. The regimen of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1, infusional 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day over 96 h beginning day 1, and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 day 1 (then 250 mg/m2 weekly), every 21 days, has manageable toxicity; these doses are recommended for phase II evaluation in the treatment for unresectable or metastatic HNSCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adelstein DJ, Tan EH, Lavertu P. Treatment of head and neck cancer: the role of chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1996;24:97–116.PubMedCrossRef Adelstein DJ, Tan EH, Lavertu P. Treatment of head and neck cancer: the role of chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1996;24:97–116.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-Garcia E, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:257–63.PubMed Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-Garcia E, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:257–63.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1245–51.PubMed Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1245–51.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Clavel M, Vermorken JB, Cognetti F, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:521–6.PubMed Clavel M, Vermorken JB, Cognetti F, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:521–6.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.PubMedCrossRef Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–27.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rubin Grandis J, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, et al. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:824–32.PubMedCrossRef Rubin Grandis J, Melhem MF, Gooding WE, et al. Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:824–32.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chung CH, Ely K, McGavran L, et al. Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4170–6.PubMedCrossRef Chung CH, Ely K, McGavran L, et al. Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4170–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Temam S, Kawaguchi H, El-Naggar AK, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number alterations correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2164–70.PubMedCrossRef Temam S, Kawaguchi H, El-Naggar AK, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor copy number alterations correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2164–70.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goldstein NI, Prewett M, Zuklys K, et al. Biological efficacy of a chimeric antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human tumor xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:1311–8.PubMed Goldstein NI, Prewett M, Zuklys K, et al. Biological efficacy of a chimeric antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human tumor xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:1311–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Li S, Schmitz KR, Jeffrey PD, et al. Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:301–11.PubMedCrossRef Li S, Schmitz KR, Jeffrey PD, et al. Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:301–11.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD, et al. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med. 1983;1:511–29.PubMed Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD, et al. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med. 1983;1:511–29.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Patel D, Guo X, Ng S, et al. IgG isotype, glycosylation, and EGFR expression determine the induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro by cetuximab. Hum Antibod. 2010;19:89–99. Patel D, Guo X, Ng S, et al. IgG isotype, glycosylation, and EGFR expression determine the induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro by cetuximab. Hum Antibod. 2010;19:89–99.
13.
go back to reference Kimura H, Sakai K, Arao T, et al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1275–80.PubMedCrossRef Kimura H, Sakai K, Arao T, et al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1275–80.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhang W, Gordon M, Schultheis AM, et al. FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with single-agent cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3712–8.PubMedCrossRef Zhang W, Gordon M, Schultheis AM, et al. FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with single-agent cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3712–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2171–7.PubMedCrossRef Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2171–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, et al. Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5569–77. Baselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, et al. Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5569–77.
17.
go back to reference Herbst RS, Arquette M, Shin DM, et al. Phase II multicenter study of the epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab and cisplatin for recurrent and refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5578–87.PubMedCrossRef Herbst RS, Arquette M, Shin DM, et al. Phase II multicenter study of the epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab and cisplatin for recurrent and refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5578–87.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fan Z, Baselga J, Masui H, Mendelsohn J. Antitumor effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum on well established A431 cell xenografts. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4637–42.PubMed Fan Z, Baselga J, Masui H, Mendelsohn J. Antitumor effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum on well established A431 cell xenografts. Cancer Res. 1993;53:4637–42.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Reed E, Kohn KW. Platinum analogues. In: Chabner BA, Collins JM, editors. Cancer chemotherapy. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1990. p. 465–90. Reed E, Kohn KW. Platinum analogues. In: Chabner BA, Collins JM, editors. Cancer chemotherapy. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1990. p. 465–90.
20.
go back to reference Al-Sarraf M. Head and neck cancer: chemotherapy concepts. Semin Oncol. 1988;15:70–85.PubMed Al-Sarraf M. Head and neck cancer: chemotherapy concepts. Semin Oncol. 1988;15:70–85.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Legallicier B, Leclere C, Monteil C, Elkaz V, Morin JP, Fillastre JP. The cellular toxicity of two antitumoural agents derived from platinum, cisplatinum versus oxaliplatin, on cultures of tubular proximal cells. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1996;22:41–50.PubMed Legallicier B, Leclere C, Monteil C, Elkaz V, Morin JP, Fillastre JP. The cellular toxicity of two antitumoural agents derived from platinum, cisplatinum versus oxaliplatin, on cultures of tubular proximal cells. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1996;22:41–50.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Rixe O, Ortuzar W, Alvarez M, et al. Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute’s Anticancer Drug Screen panel. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;52:1855–65.PubMedCrossRef Rixe O, Ortuzar W, Alvarez M, et al. Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute’s Anticancer Drug Screen panel. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;52:1855–65.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fukuda M, Ohe Y, Kanzawa F, Oka M, Hara K, Saijo N. Evaluation of novel platinum complexes, inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sublines resistant to cisplatin. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:393–8.PubMed Fukuda M, Ohe Y, Kanzawa F, Oka M, Hara K, Saijo N. Evaluation of novel platinum complexes, inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sublines resistant to cisplatin. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:393–8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Dunn TA, Schmoll HJ, Grunwald V, Bokemeyer C, Casper J. Comparative cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in non-seminomatous germ cell cancer cell lines. Invest New Drugs. 1997;15:109–14.PubMedCrossRef Dunn TA, Schmoll HJ, Grunwald V, Bokemeyer C, Casper J. Comparative cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in non-seminomatous germ cell cancer cell lines. Invest New Drugs. 1997;15:109–14.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Extra JM, Marty M, Brienza S, Misset JL. Pharmacokinetics and safety profile of oxaliplatin. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:13–22.PubMed Extra JM, Marty M, Brienza S, Misset JL. Pharmacokinetics and safety profile of oxaliplatin. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:13–22.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Woynarowski JM, Chapman WG, Napier C, Herzig MC, Juniewicz P. Sequence- and region-specificity of oxaliplatin adducts in naked and cellular DNA. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:770–7.PubMed Woynarowski JM, Chapman WG, Napier C, Herzig MC, Juniewicz P. Sequence- and region-specificity of oxaliplatin adducts in naked and cellular DNA. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:770–7.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Degardin M, Cappelaere P, Krakowski I, Fargeot P, Cupissol D, Brienza S. Phase II trial of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in advanced, recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996;32B:278–9.PubMedCrossRef Degardin M, Cappelaere P, Krakowski I, Fargeot P, Cupissol D, Brienza S. Phase II trial of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in advanced, recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1996;32B:278–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Debled M, Gervais R, Laguerre B et al. (2003) Phase II study of oxaliplatin (OXA) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in first line treatment of locally advanced (LA) or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:509 (abstr 2049). Debled M, Gervais R, Laguerre B et al. (2003) Phase II study of oxaliplatin (OXA) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in first line treatment of locally advanced (LA) or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:509 (abstr 2049).
29.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E, Díaz-Rubio E, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5225–32.PubMedCrossRef Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E, Díaz-Rubio E, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5225–32.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.PubMedCrossRef Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase I pilot study of oxaliplatin, infusional 5-FU, and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer
Authors
Joseph I. Clark
Joshua B. Greene
Ann Lau Clark
Jay S. Dalal
Craig C. Hofmeister
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0358-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Medical Oncology 1/2013 Go to the issue