Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 2/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Paper

Clinicopathologic features and prognosis analysis of mucinous gastric carcinoma

Authors: Chunming Yin, Deming Li, Zhe Sun, Ting Zhang, Yan Xu, Zhenning Wang, Huimian Xu

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Mucious gastric carcinoma (MGC) is a subtype of gastric carcinoma and its clinicopathologic features and prognosis still remain unclear. To investigate the clinical significance and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma, 2,769 patients with gastric carcinoma were analyzed in a case control study. We reviewed the records of 196 patients with mucinous gastric carcinoma and 2,573 with nonmucinous gastric carcinoma (NGC). Clinicopathologic features and survival rate of patients were analyzed. In all registered patients, patients with MGC had a larger size, more T3 and T4 invasion to the gastric wall, more positive lymph node metastasis, more III and IV stage and more positive peritoneal dissemination, but less curative gastrectomy. In curative gastrectomy patients, MGC had larger size, deeper invasion to gastric wall, more positive lymph node metastasis and more advanced TNM stage. The overall survival rate in curative gastrectomy patients with MGC was significantly lower than that for patients with NGC (P < 0.021). Age (P = 0.001), location of tumor (P < 0.001), Borrmann type (P = 0.037), depth of invasion (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of gastric carcinoma, but MGC itself was not. The prognosis of MGC did not have significant difference compared with NGC. Frequently, MGC was of advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Age, location of tumor, Borrmann type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion are independent prognostic factors of gastric carcinoma, but mucinous histological type itself is not. Further study on the origin and progression of MGC is needed in future.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lauren P. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.PubMed Lauren P. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.PubMedCrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hidaka S, et al. Clinicopathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:791–4.PubMed Hidaka S, et al. Clinicopathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:791–4.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Woo LS, Kim DY, Kim YJ, Kim SK. Clinicopathologic features of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2002;19:286–90.PubMedCrossRef Woo LS, Kim DY, Kim YJ, Kim SK. Clinicopathologic features of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2002;19:286–90.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kawamura H, et al. A clinicopathologic study of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:83–6.PubMedCrossRef Kawamura H, et al. A clinicopathologic study of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:83–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hoerr SO, Hazard JB, Bailey D. Prognosis in carcinoma of the stomach in relation to the microscopic type. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;122:485–94.PubMed Hoerr SO, Hazard JB, Bailey D. Prognosis in carcinoma of the stomach in relation to the microscopic type. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;122:485–94.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Adachi Y, et al. Clinicopathologic study of early-stage mucinous gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91:698–703.PubMedCrossRef Adachi Y, et al. Clinicopathologic study of early-stage mucinous gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91:698–703.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jass JR, Sobin LH, Watanabe H. The World Health Organization’s histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1990;66:2162–7.PubMedCrossRef Jass JR, Sobin LH, Watanabe H. The World Health Organization’s histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1990;66:2162–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu CY, Yeh HZ, Shih RT, Chen GH. A clinicopathologic study of mucinous gastric carcinoma including multivariate analysis. Cancer. 1998;83:1312–8.PubMedCrossRef Wu CY, Yeh HZ, Shih RT, Chen GH. A clinicopathologic study of mucinous gastric carcinoma including multivariate analysis. Cancer. 1998;83:1312–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hyung WJ, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 1999;40:99–106.PubMed Hyung WJ, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 1999;40:99–106.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Yasuda K, et al. Pathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:272–7.PubMedCrossRef Yasuda K, et al. Pathology and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:272–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choi JS, Kim MA, Lee HE, Lee HS, Kim WH. Mucious gastric carcinomas : clinicopathologic and molecular analyses. Cancer. 2009;115:3581–90.PubMedCrossRef Choi JS, Kim MA, Lee HE, Lee HS, Kim WH. Mucious gastric carcinomas : clinicopathologic and molecular analyses. Cancer. 2009;115:3581–90.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Choi MG, et al. Mucinous gastric cancer presents with more advanced tumor stage and weaker β-catenin expression than nonmucinous cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3053–8.PubMedCrossRef Choi MG, et al. Mucinous gastric cancer presents with more advanced tumor stage and weaker β-catenin expression than nonmucinous cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3053–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:836–42.PubMedCrossRef Kunisaki C, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of mucinous gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:836–42.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhang M, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:64–7.PubMedCrossRef Zhang M, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of mucinous gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:64–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ma J, De Boer WG, Nayman J. Intestinal mucinous substances in gastric intestinal metaplasia and carcinoma studied by immunofluorescence. Cancer. 1982;49:1664–7.PubMedCrossRef Ma J, De Boer WG, Nayman J. Intestinal mucinous substances in gastric intestinal metaplasia and carcinoma studied by immunofluorescence. Cancer. 1982;49:1664–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinicopathologic features and prognosis analysis of mucinous gastric carcinoma
Authors
Chunming Yin
Deming Li
Zhe Sun
Ting Zhang
Yan Xu
Zhenning Wang
Huimian Xu
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-9825-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Medical Oncology 2/2012 Go to the issue