Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Paper

Distribution of some activating KRAS and BRAF mutations in Slovene patients with colorectal cancer

Authors: Alenka Ličar, Petra Cerkovnik, Srdjan Novaković

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have shown that anti-EGFR therapies are effective only in a subset of patients with colorectal cancer. Even though mutations in the KRAS gene have been confirmed as negative predictors of the response to EGFR-targeted therapies, not all KRAS wild-type (wt-KRAS) patients will respond to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that additionally wild-type BRAF (wt-BRAF) genotype is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab, suggesting that BRAF genotype criteria should be used together with KRAS genotype for selecting the patients who are about to benefit from the anti-EGFR therapy. In this study, 239 samples obtained from 215 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were tested for the presence of the seven most common mutations in the KRAS gene and the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Among the tested patients, 53.8% of patients had wt-KRAS genotype and 46.2% were KRAS mutants. Around five percent (5.1%) of the tested patients bore the V600E mutation in BRAF gene. All the patients showing to have the V600E mutation in BRAF were wt-KRAS. The concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutational status between primary and metastatic tumor tissue samples was 100%. We have shown that the proportions of mutated and non-mutated KRAS in Slovene patients, as well as the proportion of V600E mutations in BRAF is similar to genotyping results reported by other authors. The tested seven KRAS mutations on codons 12 and 13 were mutually exclusive with the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Summing up the results about the KRAS and the BRAF mutation carriers from our study, the portion of potentially non-responsive patients for the anti-EGFR treatment is 51.3%.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peyssonnaux C, Eychene A. The Raf/MEK/ERK pathway: new concepts of activation. Bioll Cell. 2001;93:53–62.CrossRef Peyssonnaux C, Eychene A. The Raf/MEK/ERK pathway: new concepts of activation. Bioll Cell. 2001;93:53–62.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Harari PM, Allen GW, Bonner JA. Biology of interactions: anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4057–65.PubMedCrossRef Harari PM, Allen GW, Bonner JA. Biology of interactions: anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4057–65.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hemming AW, et al. Prognostic markers of colorectal cancer: an evaluation of DNA content, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Ki-67. J Surg Oncol. 1992;51:147–52.PubMedCrossRef Hemming AW, et al. Prognostic markers of colorectal cancer: an evaluation of DNA content, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Ki-67. J Surg Oncol. 1992;51:147–52.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kluftinger AM, Robinson BW, Quenville NF, Finley RJ, Davies NJ. Correlation of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB2 oncogene product to known prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1992;1:97–105.CrossRef Kluftinger AM, Robinson BW, Quenville NF, Finley RJ, Davies NJ. Correlation of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB2 oncogene product to known prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1992;1:97–105.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mayer A, et al. The prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mdr gene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1993;71:2454–60.PubMedCrossRef Mayer A, et al. The prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mdr gene expression in colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1993;71:2454–60.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1995;19:183–232.PubMedCrossRef Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1995;19:183–232.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spano JP, et al. Impact of EGFR expression on colorectal cancer patient prognosis and survival. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:102–8.PubMedCrossRef Spano JP, et al. Impact of EGFR expression on colorectal cancer patient prognosis and survival. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:102–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bonomi PD, Buckingham L, Coon J. Selecting patients for treatment with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4606s–12s.CrossRef Bonomi PD, Buckingham L, Coon J. Selecting patients for treatment with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4606s–12s.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dassonville O, Bozec A, Fischel JL, Milano G. EGFR targeting therapies: monoclonal antibodies versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Similarities and differences. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;62:53–61.PubMedCrossRef Dassonville O, Bozec A, Fischel JL, Milano G. EGFR targeting therapies: monoclonal antibodies versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Similarities and differences. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;62:53–61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Amado RG, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34. Amado RG, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34.
11.
go back to reference Kimura H, et al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1275–80.PubMedCrossRef Kimura H, et al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1275–80.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lievre A, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(3):374–9.PubMedCrossRef Lievre A, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(3):374–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference De Roock W, et al. KRAS mutation status and early radiological response predict survival in colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–15.PubMedCrossRef De Roock W, et al. KRAS mutation status and early radiological response predict survival in colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–15.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zenker M, et al. Expansion of the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum in patients with KRAS germline mutations. J Med Genet. 2007;44:131–5.PubMedCrossRef Zenker M, et al. Expansion of the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum in patients with KRAS germline mutations. J Med Genet. 2007;44:131–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Van Krieken JHJM, et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch. 2008;453(5):417–31.PubMedCrossRef Van Krieken JHJM, et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch. 2008;453(5):417–31.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linardou H, et al. Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:962–72.PubMedCrossRef Linardou H, et al. Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:962–72.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davies H, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2001;417:949–54.CrossRef Davies H, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2001;417:949–54.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sala E, et al. BRAF silencing by short hairpin RNA or chemical blockade by PLX4032 leads to different responses in melanoma and thyroid carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(5):751–9.PubMedCrossRef Sala E, et al. BRAF silencing by short hairpin RNA or chemical blockade by PLX4032 leads to different responses in melanoma and thyroid carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(5):751–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim IJ, et al. Mutational analysis of BRAF and K-ras in gastric cancers: absence of BRAF mutations in gastric cancers. Hum Genet. 2003;114:118–20.PubMedCrossRef Kim IJ, et al. Mutational analysis of BRAF and K-ras in gastric cancers: absence of BRAF mutations in gastric cancers. Hum Genet. 2003;114:118–20.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kumar R, et al. BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:3362–8.PubMed Kumar R, et al. BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:3362–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Di Nicolantino F, et al. Wild Type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–12.CrossRef Di Nicolantino F, et al. Wild Type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5705–12.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bardelli A, Sienna S. Molecular mechanysms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1254–61.PubMedCrossRef Bardelli A, Sienna S. Molecular mechanysms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1254–61.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Laurent-Puig P, et al. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5924–31.PubMedCrossRef Laurent-Puig P, et al. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(35):5924–31.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Benlloch S, et al. Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer: comparison of automatic sequencing and real-time chemistry methodology. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(5):540–3.PubMedCrossRef Benlloch S, et al. Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer: comparison of automatic sequencing and real-time chemistry methodology. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(5):540–3.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Cunningham D, et al. Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ study. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:692–6.PubMedCrossRef Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Cunningham D, et al. Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ study. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:692–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Di Fiore F, et al. Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1166–9.PubMedCrossRef Di Fiore F, et al. Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1166–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gnanasampanthan G, Elsaleh H, McCaul K, Iacopetta B. Ki-ras mutation type and the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in Dukes’ C colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2001;195:543–8.PubMedCrossRef Gnanasampanthan G, Elsaleh H, McCaul K, Iacopetta B. Ki-ras mutation type and the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in Dukes’ C colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2001;195:543–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Neuman J, Kirchner T, Jung A. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205(12):858–62.CrossRef Neuman J, Kirchner T, Jung A. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205(12):858–62.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Yuen S, et al. Similarity of the phenotypic patterns associated with BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6451–5.PubMed Yuen S, et al. Similarity of the phenotypic patterns associated with BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6451–5.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Roth AD, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;28(3):466–74.PubMedCrossRef Roth AD, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;28(3):466–74.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rajagopalan H, et al. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes, mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934.PubMedCrossRef Rajagopalan H, et al. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes, mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Artale S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Veronese SM. Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4217–9.PubMedCrossRef Artale S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Veronese SM. Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4217–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B. High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practise. Oncologist. 2008;13:1270–5.PubMedCrossRef Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B. High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practise. Oncologist. 2008;13:1270–5.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Velho S, et al. BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA mutations in colorectal serrated polyps, cancer: primary or secondary genetic events in colorectal carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:255.PubMedCrossRef Velho S, et al. BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA mutations in colorectal serrated polyps, cancer: primary or secondary genetic events in colorectal carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:255.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Distribution of some activating KRAS and BRAF mutations in Slovene patients with colorectal cancer
Authors
Alenka Ličar
Petra Cerkovnik
Srdjan Novaković
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9631-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Medical Oncology 4/2011 Go to the issue