Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 2/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Paper

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for “Triple Negative” breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook

Author: Zeina Nahleh

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients with breast cancer who achieve a complete pathologic response (pCR) after preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy have an improved prognosis compared to those with residual disease; pCR being a good surrogate of long-term survival and cure from breast cancer. Despite their relative chemosensitivity, less than 25% of all patients with HER2/neu negative (0–2+), and hormone receptors (HR) negative tumors, so-called “Triple Negative” breast cancer (TNBC) treated with standard preoperative chemotherapy achieve pCR. Among patients with residual disease (no pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with TNBC have the worst prognosis and overall survival. These patients lack the benefit of subsequent targeted therapy. Many studies have addressed improving the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by including different cytotoxic agents, biologic modifiers, regimens, and schedules. Up to now, apart from trastuzumab for HRE2/neu+ tumors, none of the targeted agents can be considered a standard therapeutic option for primary systemic treatment. We hereby review the current literature on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, emphasizing treatment of TNBC. We also discuss potentially new therapeutic strategies that target this high risk group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6187.CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–9. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​02.​6187.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemoT in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.PubMed Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Preoperative chemoT in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1665.CrossRefPubMed Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​04.​1665.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kennedy RD, Quinn JE, Mullan PB, et al. The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1659–68.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy RD, Quinn JE, Mullan PB, et al. The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1659–68.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Smith IE, A’Hern RP, Coombes GA, et al. A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemoT regimen compared with conventional chemoT in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:751–8. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh175.CrossRefPubMed Smith IE, A’Hern RP, Coombes GA, et al. A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemoT regimen compared with conventional chemoT in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:751–8. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdh175.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chua S, Smith IE, A’Hern RP, et al. Neoadjuvant vinorelbine/epirubicin (VE) versus standard adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in operable breast cancer: analysis of response and tolerability in a randomised phase III trial (TOPIC 2). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(9):1435–41. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi276.CrossRefPubMed Chua S, Smith IE, A’Hern RP, et al. Neoadjuvant vinorelbine/epirubicin (VE) versus standard adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) in operable breast cancer: analysis of response and tolerability in a randomised phase III trial (TOPIC 2). Ann Oncol. 2005;16(9):1435–41. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdi276.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pelissier P, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, et al. Intensified anthracyclin doses do not improve clinical and pathological responses to neoadjuvant FEC for operable breast cancer (BC): results of a multicenter randomized trial [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:254. Pelissier P, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, et al. Intensified anthracyclin doses do not improve clinical and pathological responses to neoadjuvant FEC for operable breast cancer (BC): results of a multicenter randomized trial [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:254.
15.
go back to reference Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Theriault RL, et al. Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemoT with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3412–7.PubMed Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Theriault RL, et al. Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemoT with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3412–7.PubMed
16.
go back to reference EBCTG. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1687–717.CrossRef EBCTG. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1687–717.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Delaloge S. BRCA1-linked breast cancer (BC) is highly more chemosensitive than its BRCA2-linked or sporadic counterparts (abstract). Ann Oncol. 2002;13(Suppl 5):34. Delaloge S. BRCA1-linked breast cancer (BC) is highly more chemosensitive than its BRCA2-linked or sporadic counterparts (abstract). Ann Oncol. 2002;13(Suppl 5):34.
20.
go back to reference de Matteis A, Nuzzo F, D’Aiuto G, et al. Docetaxel plus epidoxorubicin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with large operable or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a single-center, phase II study. Cancer. 2002;94:895–901. doi:10.1002/cncr.20335.CrossRefPubMed de Matteis A, Nuzzo F, D’Aiuto G, et al. Docetaxel plus epidoxorubicin as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with large operable or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a single-center, phase II study. Cancer. 2002;94:895–901. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​20335.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wenzel C, Locker GJ, Schmidinger M, et al. Combined analysis of two phase II trials in patients with primary and advanced breast cancer with epidoxorubicin and docetaxel+granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Anticancer Drugs. 2002;13:67–74. doi:10.1097/00001813-200201000-00008.CrossRefPubMed Wenzel C, Locker GJ, Schmidinger M, et al. Combined analysis of two phase II trials in patients with primary and advanced breast cancer with epidoxorubicin and docetaxel+granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Anticancer Drugs. 2002;13:67–74. doi:10.​1097/​00001813-200201000-00008.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Gogas H, Papadimitriou C, Kalofonos HP, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoT with a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1737–42. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf284.CrossRefPubMed Gogas H, Papadimitriou C, Kalofonos HP, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoT with a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1737–42. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdf284.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Moliterni A, Tarenzi E, Capri G, et al. Pilot study of primary chemoT with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel in women with locally advanced or operable breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:S17.PubMed Moliterni A, Tarenzi E, Capri G, et al. Pilot study of primary chemoT with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel in women with locally advanced or operable breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:S17.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Bellino R, Cortese P, Danese S, et al. Epidoxorubicin and paclitaxel as primary chemotherapy for T > 3 cm and T4 breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:4825–8.PubMed Bellino R, Cortese P, Danese S, et al. Epidoxorubicin and paclitaxel as primary chemotherapy for T > 3 cm and T4 breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:4825–8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Semlglazov VF, Bojok AA, Arsumanov AS, et al. Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemoT paclitaxel plus doxorubicin vs fluorouracil plus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:S52. Semlglazov VF, Bojok AA, Arsumanov AS, et al. Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemoT paclitaxel plus doxorubicin vs fluorouracil plus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:S52.
30.
go back to reference Evans TR, Yellowlees A, Foster E, et al. Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2988–95. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.156.CrossRefPubMed Evans TR, Yellowlees A, Foster E, et al. Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2988–95. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​06.​156.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Dieras V, Fumoleau P, Romieu G, et al. Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4958–65. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.02.122.CrossRefPubMed Dieras V, Fumoleau P, Romieu G, et al. Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4958–65. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​02.​122.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Steger GG, Galid A, Gnant M, et al. Pathologic complete response with six compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicin plus docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in operable breast cancer: results of ABCSG-14. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2012–8. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1777.CrossRefPubMed Steger GG, Galid A, Gnant M, et al. Pathologic complete response with six compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicin plus docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in operable breast cancer: results of ABCSG-14. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2012–8. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​09.​1777.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference von MG, Blohmer JU, Raab G, et al. In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemoT in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:56–63. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi001.CrossRef von MG, Blohmer JU, Raab G, et al. In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemoT in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:56–63. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdi001.CrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, et al. HER2/neu and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(15):1496–506. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa071167.CrossRefPubMed Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, et al. HER2/neu and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(15):1496–506. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa071167.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Baldini E, Gardin G, Giannessi PG, et al. Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:227–32. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg069.CrossRefPubMed Baldini E, Gardin G, Giannessi PG, et al. Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:227–32. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdg069.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Euler U, Dresel V, Buhner M, et al. Dose and time intensified epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:S51. Euler U, Dresel V, Buhner M, et al. Dose and time intensified epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76:S51.
41.
go back to reference Miller KD, Caskill-Stevens W, Sisk J, et al. Combination versus sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemoT for breast cancer: a randomized pilot trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3033–7.PubMed Miller KD, Caskill-Stevens W, Sisk J, et al. Combination versus sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemoT for breast cancer: a randomized pilot trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3033–7.PubMed
42.
go back to reference von MG, Costa SD, Eiermann W, et al. Maximized reduction of primary breast tumor size using preoperative chemoT with doxorubicin and docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1999–2005. von MG, Costa SD, Eiermann W, et al. Maximized reduction of primary breast tumor size using preoperative chemoT with doxorubicin and docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1999–2005.
43.
go back to reference Cooper BW, Radivoyevitch T, Overmoyer BA, et al. Phase II study of dose-dense sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel for patients with advanced operable and inoperable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;97:311–8. doi:10.1007/s10549-005-9125-4.CrossRefPubMed Cooper BW, Radivoyevitch T, Overmoyer BA, et al. Phase II study of dose-dense sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel for patients with advanced operable and inoperable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;97:311–8. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-005-9125-4.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Untch M, Konency G, Ditsch N, et al. Dose-dense sequential epirubicin-pacilitaxel as preoperative treatment of breast cancer: results of a randomized AGO study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:34a. Untch M, Konency G, Ditsch N, et al. Dose-dense sequential epirubicin-pacilitaxel as preoperative treatment of breast cancer: results of a randomized AGO study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:34a.
45.
go back to reference Minckwitz G, Raab G, Caputo A, et al. Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2676–85. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.078.CrossRef Minckwitz G, Raab G, Caputo A, et al. Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2676–85. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​05.​078.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1431–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081.CrossRefPubMed Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1431–9. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​09.​081.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Gluz O, Nitz UA, Harbeck N. Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial. West German Study Group. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(5):861–70. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm551.CrossRefPubMed Gluz O, Nitz UA, Harbeck N. Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial. West German Study Group. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(5):861–70. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdm551.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya A, Ear US, Koller BH, et al. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:23899–903. doi:10.1074/jbc.C000276200.CrossRefPubMed Bhattacharyya A, Ear US, Koller BH, et al. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:23899–903. doi:10.​1074/​jbc.​C000276200.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Garber JE, Richardson A, Harris LN, et al. Neo-adjuvant cisplatin (CDDP) in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Proceedings San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2006 (Abstract 3074). SABCS 2006 (abstract 3074). Garber JE, Richardson A, Harris LN, et al. Neo-adjuvant cisplatin (CDDP) in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Proceedings San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2006 (Abstract 3074). SABCS 2006 (abstract 3074).
51.
go back to reference Cleator S, Helle W, Coombes CR. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):235–44.CrossRefPubMed Cleator S, Helle W, Coombes CR. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):235–44.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Kreike B, van Kouwenhove M, Horlings H, et al. Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(5):R65. doi:10.1186/bcr1771.CrossRefPubMed Kreike B, van Kouwenhove M, Horlings H, et al. Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(5):R65. doi:10.​1186/​bcr1771.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Ayers M, Symmans WF, Stec J, et al. Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemoT in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2284–93. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.05.166.CrossRefPubMed Ayers M, Symmans WF, Stec J, et al. Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemoT in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2284–93. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​05.​166.CrossRefPubMed
61.
62.
Metadata
Title
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for “Triple Negative” breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook
Author
Zeina Nahleh
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9244-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Medical Oncology 2/2010 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.