Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Technical Report

Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples

Authors: Jennifer M. Young, Laura S. Weyrich, Laurence J. Clarke, Alan Cooper

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Forensic soil analysis relies on capturing an accurate and reproducible representation of the diversity from limited quantities of soil; however, inefficient DNA extraction can markedly alter the taxonomic abundance. The performance of a standard commercial DNA extraction kit (MOBIO PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit) and three modified protocols of this kit: soil pellet re-extraction (RE); an additional 24-h lysis incubation step at room temperature (RT); and 24-h lysis incubation step at 55 °C (55) were compared using high-throughput sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer I ribosomal DNA. DNA yield was not correlated with fungal diversity and the four DNA extraction methods displayed distinct fungal community profiles for individual samples, with some phyla detected exclusively using the modified methods. Application of a 24 h lysis step will provide a more complete inventory of fungal biodiversity, and re-extraction of the residual soil pellet offers a novel tool for increasing discriminatory power between forensic soil samples.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Concheri G. Chemical elemental distribution and soil DNA fingerprints provide the critical evidence in murder case investigation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20222.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Concheri G. Chemical elemental distribution and soil DNA fingerprints provide the critical evidence in murder case investigation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20222.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick RW, Raven MD, Forrester ST. A systematic approach to soil forensics: criminal case studies involving transference from crime scene to forensic evidence. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller L, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 105–27.CrossRef Fitzpatrick RW, Raven MD, Forrester ST. A systematic approach to soil forensics: criminal case studies involving transference from crime scene to forensic evidence. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller L, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 105–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sensabaugh GF. Microbial community profiling for the characterisation of soil evidence: forensic considerations. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller L, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 49–60.CrossRef Sensabaugh GF. Microbial community profiling for the characterisation of soil evidence: forensic considerations. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller L, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 49–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Macdonald LM, Singh BK, Thomas N, Brewer MJ, Campbell CD, Dawson LA. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:813–21.CrossRefPubMed Macdonald LM, Singh BK, Thomas N, Brewer MJ, Campbell CD, Dawson LA. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:813–21.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Young JM, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;13:176–84.CrossRefPubMed Young JM, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;13:176–84.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Delmont TO, Robe P, Clark I, Simonet P, Vogel TM. Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;86:397–400.CrossRefPubMed Delmont TO, Robe P, Clark I, Simonet P, Vogel TM. Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;86:397–400.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Robe P, Nalin R, Capellano C, Vogel TA, Simonet P. Extraction of DNA from soil. Eur J Soil Biol. 2003;39:183–90.CrossRef Robe P, Nalin R, Capellano C, Vogel TA, Simonet P. Extraction of DNA from soil. Eur J Soil Biol. 2003;39:183–90.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Courtois S, Frostegård A, Göransson P, Depret G, Jeannin P, Simonet P. Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation. Environ Microbiol. 2001;3:431–9.CrossRefPubMed Courtois S, Frostegård A, Göransson P, Depret G, Jeannin P, Simonet P. Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation. Environ Microbiol. 2001;3:431–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Frostegård A, Courtois S, Ramisse V, Clerc S, Bernillon D, Le Gall F, Jeannin P, Nesme X, Simonet P. Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5409–20.PubMedCentralPubMed Frostegård A, Courtois S, Ramisse V, Clerc S, Bernillon D, Le Gall F, Jeannin P, Nesme X, Simonet P. Quantification of bias related to the extraction of DNA directly from soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5409–20.PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Feinstein LM, Sul WJ, Blackwood CB. Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5428–33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Feinstein LM, Sul WJ, Blackwood CB. Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5428–33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jiang YX, Wu JG, Yu KQ, Ai CX, Zou F, Zhou HW. Integrated lysis procedures reduce extraction biases of microbial DNA from mangrove sediment. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111:153–7.CrossRefPubMed Jiang YX, Wu JG, Yu KQ, Ai CX, Zou F, Zhou HW. Integrated lysis procedures reduce extraction biases of microbial DNA from mangrove sediment. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111:153–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zhou JZ, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:316–22.PubMedCentralPubMed Zhou JZ, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:316–22.PubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mumy KL, Findlay RH. Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2004;57:259–68.CrossRefPubMed Mumy KL, Findlay RH. Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2004;57:259–68.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lloyd-Jones G, Hunter DWF. Comparison of rapid DNA extraction methods applied to contrasting New Zealand soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:2053–9.CrossRef Lloyd-Jones G, Hunter DWF. Comparison of rapid DNA extraction methods applied to contrasting New Zealand soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:2053–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jones MD, Singleton DR, Sun W, Aitken MD. Multiple DNA extractions coupled with stable-isotope probing of anthracene-degrading bacteria in contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:2984–91.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jones MD, Singleton DR, Sun W, Aitken MD. Multiple DNA extractions coupled with stable-isotope probing of anthracene-degrading bacteria in contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:2984–91.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Berry D, Mahfoudh KB, Wagner M, Loy A. Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7846–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Berry D, Mahfoudh KB, Wagner M, Loy A. Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7846–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Epp LS, Boessenkool S, Bellemain EP, Haile J, Esposito A, Riaz T, et al. New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1821–33.CrossRefPubMed Epp LS, Boessenkool S, Bellemain EP, Haile J, Esposito A, Riaz T, et al. New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1821–33.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Meyer M, Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;(6):pdb.prot5448. Meyer M, Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;(6):pdb.prot5448.
19.
go back to reference Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Bioinformatics in Action. 2012;17:10–2. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Bioinformatics in Action. 2012;17:10–2.
20.
go back to reference Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.CrossRefPubMed Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples
Authors
Jennifer M. Young
Laura S. Weyrich
Laurence J. Clarke
Alan Cooper
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9662-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2/2015 Go to the issue