Published in:
01-09-2018 | Endocrine Methods and Techniques
Does the ACR TI-RADS scoring allow us to safely avoid unnecessary thyroid biopsy? single center analysis in a large cohort
Published in: Endocrine | Issue 3/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Introduction
The American College of Radiology (ACR) has recently proposed a guideline that recommends clinicians to perform thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) on the basis of ultrasound features. In this study, we focused on nodules for which no biopsy is recommended by the ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) guideline.
Subjects and methods
Two-thousand eight-hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with thyroid nodules who underwent FNAB according to the 2009 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline were included. The nodules were re-classified according to the ACR TI-RADS guideline as benign (TR1), not suspicious (TR2), mildly suspicious (TR3), moderately suspicious (TR4) and highly suspicious (TR5). The TR3 category was stratified into two subcategories as regard to the nodule size (TR3; <25 mm and TR3; ≥25 mm).
Results
Two-hundred and thirty-three (8.2%) patients with non-diagnostic FNABs were excluded. When the TR2 and TR3; <25 mm categories were merged, FNAB was suggestive of thyroid cancer in 17 of 1382 patients (1.2%). FNAB revealed Bethesda IV–VI in 5 of 273 patients with the TR3; ≥25 mm category (1.8%), in 61 of 896 patients with the TR4 category (6.8%), and in 18 of 63 of patients with the TR5 category (28.6%). The ACR TI-RADS scoring was 98.8% (95% CI: 98 to 99.3) specific for identification of a benign nodule.
Conclusion
Our data suggest that ACR TI-RADS scoring is an applicable and potentially cost-effective approach to determine thyroid nodules to be biopsied, although a small proportion of thyroid cancers would be missed.