Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Cochrane in CORR

Cochrane in CORR ®: Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Authors: Ilyas S. Aleem, MD, MS, FRCSC, Brian Drew, MD, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), an age-related degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal, results in considerable morbidity particularly in older patients. Patients typically present with low-back pain and activity-related leg pain that restricts their function and quality of life [3]. The socioeconomic burden of treating this pathology is tremendous [4], highlighting the need to improve effective treatment strategies in the management of this growing demographic. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Aleem IS, Rampersaud YR. Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1824–1830.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–406.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303:1259–1265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Glasziou PP, Sanders SL. Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews. Stat Med. 2002;21:1503–1511.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:395–400.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson A, Abdu WA, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Weinstein JN. Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: Eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:63–76.
8.
Macedo LG, Hum A, Kuleba L, Mo J, Truong L, Yeung M, Battie MC. Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1646–1660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimaki T, Ronty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Harkanen T, Hurri H. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1–8.
10.
Schroeder GD, Kurd MF, Vaccaro AR. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: How Is It Classified? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:843–852.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Sobottke R, Rollinghoff M, Siewe J, Schlegel U, Yagdiran A, Spangenberg M, Lesch R, Eysel P, Koy T. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53:179–183.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794–810.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016:Cd010264.
Metadata
Title
Cochrane in CORR ®: Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Authors
Ilyas S. Aleem, MD, MS, FRCSC
Brian Drew, MD, FRCSC
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5452-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2017 Go to the issue

A Day at the Office

A Day at the Office: What if “Later” Never Comes? Four Tips for Volunteering Abroad Now

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor: False-positive Cultures After Native Knee Aspiration: True or False

CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?

Clinical Research

What Are the Complications, Survival, and Outcomes After Revision to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?

CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: What Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Correlate With Expectations With Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis?

Residency Diary

Residency Diary: My Second Year: November 2016-December 2016