Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Literature
1.
Fink B, Hahn M, Fuerst M, Thybaut L, Delling G. Principle of fixation of the cementless modular revision stem Revitan [Article in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:1029–1037.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Fink B, Urbansky K, Schuster P. Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B:889–895.
3.
Huddleston JI, Testreault MW, Yu M, Bedair H, Hansen VJ, Choi H-R, Goodman SB, Sporer MD, Della Valle CJ. Is there a benefit to modularity in “simpler” femoral revisions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:415–420.CrossRefPubMed
4.
McInnis DP, Horne G, Dvane PA. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem. Seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:372–380.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Pattyn C, Mulliez A, Verdonk R, Audenaert E. Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular tapered stem. Int Orthop. 2012;36:35–41.CrossRefPubMed
6.
van Houwelingen AP, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS. High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2013;471:454–462.CrossRef
7.
Warren PJ, Thompson P, Flechter MDA. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:557–560.PubMed
8.
Wilkes RA, Birch J, Pearse MF, Lee M, Atkins RM. The Wagner technique for revision arthroplasty of the hip: a review of 24 cases. J Orthop Reumatol. 1994;7:196–198.
Metadata
Title
Letter to the Editor: Is There a Benefit to Modularity in ‘Simpler’ Femoral Revisions?
Author
Bernd Fink, MD
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4963-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2016 Go to the issue

A Day at the Office

A Day at the Office: Is Private Practice Orthopaedic Surgery Dead?

Editor's Spotlight/Take 5

Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: CORR® ORS Richard A. Brand Award: Clinical Trials of a New Treatment Method for Adhesive Capsulitis

Symposium: Advances in PEEK Technology

The Biotribology of PEEK-on-HXLPE Bearings Is Comparable to Traditional Bearings on a Multidirectional Pin-on-disk Tester

Basic Research

High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments

Symposium: Advances in PEEK Technology

Editorial Comment: Advances in PEEK Technology

Cochrane in CORR

Cochrane in CORR ®: Surgical Versus Non-surgical Interventions for Treating Patellar Dislocation (Review)