Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Symposium: 2015 International Hip Society Proceedings

Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty

Authors: Denis Nam, MD, MSc, Toby Barrack, BA, Staci R. Johnson, MEd, Ryan M. Nunley, MD, Robert L. Barrack, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient-perceived noise from prostheses after total hip arthroplasty (THA) does occur, yet questions remain including the overall frequency of this finding, demographic and prosthesis-related factors, and the association of noise generation with patient-reported outcomes.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the frequency with which patients report noise coming from the hip after THA; (2) to identify patient and prosthesis-related factors associated with noise generation; and (3) to ascertain if noise generation is associated with pain or functional impairment after THA.

Methods

A five-center study was designed to quantify the degree of residual symptoms and functional deficits in patients undergoing THA. Three centers were academic practices, whereas two centers were private practices that provided training programs for orthopaedic residents and fellows. Each contributing surgeon was fellowship-trained and specialized in joint replacement. Inclusion criteria for this study were (1) men between 18 and 60 years old and women between 18 and 55 years old; (2) patients requiring primary hip surgery as a result of noninflammatory arthritis such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; (3) a UCLA activity score of 6 or more before they were limited by pain; and (4) patients who had undergone a primary THA within 1 to 4 years before the start of the study and had a minimum of 1 year of clinical followup. Attempts were made to contact all identified patients meeting these inclusion criteria. Data were collected by an independent, third-party survey center blinded to the implant design and bearing surface used who administered questionnaires about residual symptoms, function, and pre- and postoperative activity levels using previously published survey instruments. Patients were specifically queried regarding perceived noise from their THA. We retrospectively identified 1242 eligible patients. Of the 1242 patients, 105 were found to have exclusions during the screening section of the questionnaire: postoperative infection (six THAs), fracture (two), dislocation (seven), or revision (17); limited activity level because of an operation on the opposite hip (34); and premorbid UCLA score of less than 6 (39). In addition, 128 individuals refused to participate, 156 were never available, 108 were not found as a result of a bad address/phone number, 48 were contacted but did not complete the interview, nine had died, and six had a language barrier. This left 682 of the 1137 eligible patients with completed surveys (60% response rate). The mean age was 50 ± 8 years at the time of surgery with 63% being men, and they were contacted at a mean of 3 ± 1 years postoperatively. Bearing surfaces (femoral head-acetabular liner) included 210 (31%) metal-on-metal, 144 (21%) ceramic-on-ceramic, 142 (21%) ceramic-on-polyethylene, 141 (21%) cobalt-chromium-on-polyethylene, and 44 (6%) oxidized zirconium-on-polyethylene. Differences in baseline demographic variables were accounted for using multiple logistic regression statistical analyses. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to determine the association of noise generation with residual symptoms.

Results

Overall, 9% (61 of 682; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7–11) of young patients undergoing primary THA reported noise generation. Females (12% [30 of 251 patients]) were noted to have an increased likelihood of reporting noise versus males (7% [30 of 431 patients]; odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1–3.1; p = 0.03). After controlling for potential confounding variables including female sex and length of followup, patients receiving a ceramic-on-ceramic or metal-on-metal bearing surface (14% [50 of 355]) reported an increased frequency of grinding, popping, and clicking in the 30 days before survey administration versus those receiving a polyethylene liner with a ceramic, oxidized zirconium, or cobalt-chromium femoral head (3% [10 of 327 patients]; odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.7–11.5; p < 0.001). Noise generation was associated with increased pain (r = 0.23, p < 0.001) and stiffness (r = 0.22, p < 0.001) after THA.

Conclusions

When interviewed by an independent third party, patients receiving a metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-ceramic bearing reported a higher frequency of noise generation versus patients receiving a polyethylene liner after THA. Young patients undergoing THA should be counseled that noise generation could be associated with increased pain after THA.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amanatullah DF, Landa J, Strauss EJ, Garino JP, Kim SH, Di Cesare PE. Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;6(Suppl):72–77.CrossRef Amanatullah DF, Landa J, Strauss EJ, Garino JP, Kim SH, Di Cesare PE. Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;6(Suppl):72–77.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aoude AA, Antoniou J, Epure LM, Huk OL, Zukor DJ, Tanzer M. Midterm outcomes of the recently FDA approved ceramic on ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty patients under 65Years of age. J Arthroplasty. 2015;8:1388–1392.CrossRef Aoude AA, Antoniou J, Epure LM, Huk OL, Zukor DJ, Tanzer M. Midterm outcomes of the recently FDA approved ceramic on ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty patients under 65Years of age. J Arthroplasty. 2015;8:1388–1392.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Berend ME, Della Valle CJ, Engh CA Jr, Parvizi J, Clohisy JC, Nunley RM. Do young, active patients perceive advantages after surface replacement compared to cementless total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3803–3813.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Berend ME, Della Valle CJ, Engh CA Jr, Parvizi J, Clohisy JC, Nunley RM. Do young, active patients perceive advantages after surface replacement compared to cementless total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3803–3813.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bernasek T, Fisher D, Dalury D, Levering M, Dimitris K. Is metal-on-metal squeaking related to acetabular angle of inclination? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2577–2582.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bernasek T, Fisher D, Dalury D, Levering M, Dimitris K. Is metal-on-metal squeaking related to acetabular angle of inclination? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2577–2582.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.CrossRefPubMed Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;7:1614–1620.CrossRef Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;7:1614–1620.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brockett CL, Harper P, Williams S, Isaac GH, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Jin Z, Fisher J. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;4:1575–1579.CrossRef Brockett CL, Harper P, Williams S, Isaac GH, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Jin Z, Fisher J. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;4:1575–1579.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buttaro MA, Zanotti G, Comba FM, Piccaluga F. Squeaking in a delta ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;6:1257–1259.CrossRef Buttaro MA, Zanotti G, Comba FM, Piccaluga F. Squeaking in a delta ceramic-on-ceramic uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;6:1257–1259.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:741–746.CrossRefPubMed Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:741–746.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of cholesterol screening and high blood cholesterol among adults–United States, 2005, 2007, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:697–702. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of cholesterol screening and high blood cholesterol among adults–United States, 2005, 2007, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:697–702.
11.
go back to reference Delaunay CP, Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Laffargue P, Migaud H. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:340–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delaunay CP, Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Laffargue P, Migaud H. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:340–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;2:43.CrossRef Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;2:43.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Ramakrishnan R, Rondhuis J, Verburg AJ, Tonino AJ. Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study. Acta Orthop. 2006;5:719–725.CrossRef Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Ramakrishnan R, Rondhuis J, Verburg AJ, Tonino AJ. Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study. Acta Orthop. 2006;5:719–725.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Blumenfeld TJ, Lesko JP, Himden SE, Dennis DA. Midterm results of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(Suppl):110–115.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Blumenfeld TJ, Lesko JP, Himden SE, Dennis DA. Midterm results of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(Suppl):110–115.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Murphy JA, Blumenfeld TJ, Politi J. THA with delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:358–366.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Murphy JA, Blumenfeld TJ, Politi J. THA with delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:358–366.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;4:737–755. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;4:737–755.
17.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the united states from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;4:780–785.CrossRef Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the united states from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;4:780–785.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–2612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–2612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kwon YM, Ostlere SJ, McLardy-Smith P, Athanasou NA, Gill HS, Murray DW. ‘Asymptomatic’ pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study. J Arthroplasty. 2011;4:511–518.CrossRef Kwon YM, Ostlere SJ, McLardy-Smith P, Athanasou NA, Gill HS, Murray DW. ‘Asymptomatic’ pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study. J Arthroplasty. 2011;4:511–518.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;9597:1508–1519.CrossRef Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;9597:1508–1519.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932:1–55. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932:1–55.
22.
go back to reference Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Seng BE, Clarke IC, Adams JB. Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:367–374.CrossRefPubMed Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Seng BE, Clarke IC, Adams JB. Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:367–374.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mai K, Verioti C, Ezzet KA, Copp SN, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:413–417.CrossRefPubMed Mai K, Verioti C, Ezzet KA, Copp SN, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:413–417.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference McDonnell SM, Boyce G, Bare J, Young D, Shimmin AJ. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta motion ceramic total hip bearing. Bone Joint J. 2013;2:160–165.CrossRef McDonnell SM, Boyce G, Bare J, Young D, Shimmin AJ. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta motion ceramic total hip bearing. Bone Joint J. 2013;2:160–165.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nam D, Barrack RL, Potter HG. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3665–3673.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nam D, Barrack RL, Potter HG. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3665–3673.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Nizard R, Pourreyron D, Raould A, Hannouche D, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:317–323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nizard R, Pourreyron D, Raould A, Hannouche D, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:317–323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Radler BT, Ryff CD. Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being. J Aging Health. 2010;3:307–331.CrossRef Radler BT, Ryff CD. Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being. J Aging Health. 2010;3:307–331.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Restrepo C, Post ZD, Kai B, Hozack WJ. The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;3:550–557.CrossRef Restrepo C, Post ZD, Kai B, Hozack WJ. The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;3:550–557.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stanat SJ, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2012;3:445–453.CrossRef Stanat SJ, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2012;3:445–453.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Swanson TV, Peterson DJ, Seethala R, Bliss RL, Spellmon CA. Influence of prosthetic design on squeaking after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;6(Suppl):36–42.CrossRef Swanson TV, Peterson DJ, Seethala R, Bliss RL, Spellmon CA. Influence of prosthetic design on squeaking after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;6(Suppl):36–42.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Walter WL, Yeung E, Esposito C. A review of squeaking hips. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;6:319–326.CrossRef Walter WL, Yeung E, Esposito C. A review of squeaking hips. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;6:319–326.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;1:28–36.CrossRef Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;1:28–36.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP. The reliability and validity of the self-reported patient-specific index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;6:829–837. Wright JG, Young NL, Waddell JP. The reliability and validity of the self-reported patient-specific index for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;6:829–837.
35.
go back to reference Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;8:890–895.CrossRef Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;8:890–895.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty
Authors
Denis Nam, MD, MSc
Toby Barrack, BA
Staci R. Johnson, MEd
Ryan M. Nunley, MD
Robert L. Barrack, MD
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4759-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 10/2016 Go to the issue