Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2015

01-04-2015 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: Metal-on-conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surfaces Have a Higher Risk of Revision Than Metal-on-highly Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From a US Registry

Author: Richard W. McCalden, MD, MPhil, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) has essentially supplanted conventional polyethylene for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) during the past decade. There now exists good evidence to demonstrate a clear reduction in femoral head penetration (and presumably polyethylene wear) and periprosthetic osteolysis associated with the use XLPE compared to conventional polyethylene in THA [2, 3]. While the annual reports of Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry continue to show the clinical benefits of XLPE (demonstrating a reduction in revision rates) [1], other investigators have not demonstrated a clear reduction in revision rates with the use of XLPE at mid-term followup [4]. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262–2277.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262–2277.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:593–600.CrossRefPubMed Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:593–600.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Paxton E, Cafri G, Havelin L, Stea S, Pallisó F, Graves S, Hoeffel D, Sedrakyan A. Risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty: Metal-on-conventional polyethylene compared with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces: International results from six registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96 Suppl 1:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Paxton E, Cafri G, Havelin L, Stea S, Pallisó F, Graves S, Hoeffel D, Sedrakyan A. Risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty: Metal-on-conventional polyethylene compared with metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing surfaces: International results from six registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96 Suppl 1:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CORR Insights®: Metal-on-conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surfaces Have a Higher Risk of Revision Than Metal-on-highly Crosslinked Polyethylene: Results From a US Registry
Author
Richard W. McCalden, MD, MPhil, FRCSC
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4168-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2015 Go to the issue