Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Symposium: Complex Knee Ligament Surgery

Surgical Technique: Aperture Fixation in PCL Reconstruction: Applying Biomechanics to Surgery

Authors: Thomas J. Gill IV, MD, Samuel K. Van de Velde, MD, Kaitlin M. Carroll, BS, William J. Robertson, MD, Benton E. Heyworth, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Biomechanical studies suggest reducing the effective graft length during transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction by augmenting the distal tibial fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture could increase graft stiffness and provide a more stable reconstruction. However, it remains unknown to what extent this mechanical theory influences in vivo graft performance over time.

Surgical Technique

We developed a technique to augment tibial distal fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture to shorten the effective graft length and increase graft stiffness.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all 10 patients who had isolated PCL reconstructions with combined distal and proximal tibial fixation from 2003 to 2007. Mean age of the patients was 36.5 years. We measured ROM and obtained Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm scores. Anteroposterior stability was evaluated with a KT-2000 arthrometer. Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 2.5 years; range, 1–4.8 years).

Results

Mean Tegner scores before injury and at last followup were 7.3 and 6.5, respectively. Mean postoperative IKDC score was 87 versus a preoperative IKDC score of 43. Mean Lysholm score was 89 at last followup. All patients achieved full terminal extension. No patient had greater than a 5-mm difference in anterior or posterior displacement from the contralateral knee as measured by a KT-2000 arthrometer postoperatively (0.93 ± 0.79 mm).

Conclusions

In this small series, augmentation of tibial distal fixation with a proximal screw near the tibial tunnel aperture during reconstruction of the isolated PCL rupture restored function, motion, and stability.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Apsingi S, Nguyen T, Bull AM, Unwin A, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. Control of laxity in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency: comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with modified Larson posterolateral corner reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:487–494.PubMedCrossRef Apsingi S, Nguyen T, Bull AM, Unwin A, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. Control of laxity in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner deficiency: comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with modified Larson posterolateral corner reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:487–494.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:976–981.PubMedCrossRef Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:976–981.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boynton MD, Tietjens BR. Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:306–310.PubMedCrossRef Boynton MD, Tietjens BR. Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:306–310.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:603–612.PubMedCrossRef Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of quadriceps tendon autograft and quadruple hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:603–612.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dandy DJ, Pusey RJ. The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:92–94.PubMed Dandy DJ, Pusey RJ. The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:92–94.PubMed
6.
go back to reference DeFrate LE, van der Ven A, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of length on the structural properties of an Achilles tendon graft as used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:993–997.PubMedCrossRef DeFrate LE, van der Ven A, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of length on the structural properties of an Achilles tendon graft as used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:993–997.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gill TJ, Van de Velde SK, Wing DW, Oh LS, Hosseini A, Li G. Tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics after reconstruction of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury: in vivo analysis during lunge. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2377–2385.PubMedCrossRef Gill TJ, Van de Velde SK, Wing DW, Oh LS, Hosseini A, Li G. Tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics after reconstruction of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury: in vivo analysis during lunge. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2377–2385.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K. A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006;35:568–571. Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K. A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006;35:568–571.
9.
go back to reference Hermans S, Corten K, Bellemans J. Long-term results of isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament: a 6- to 12-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1499–1507.PubMedCrossRef Hermans S, Corten K, Bellemans J. Long-term results of isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament: a 6- to 12-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1499–1507.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Houe T, Jorgensen U. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one- vs two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14:107–111.PubMedCrossRef Houe T, Jorgensen U. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one- vs two-tunnel technique. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14:107–111.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR, Norwood LA. Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:438–450. Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR, Norwood LA. Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:438–450.
12.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600–613.PubMed Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600–613.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC. Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:132–136.PubMedCrossRef Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC. Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:132–136.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Kim TE, Jo SB, Kung YP. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2543–2549.PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, Kim TE, Jo SB, Kung YP. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2543–2549.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li G, DeFrate L, Suggs J, Gill T. Determination of optimal graft lengths for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a theoretical analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125:295–299.PubMedCrossRef Li G, DeFrate L, Suggs J, Gill T. Determination of optimal graft lengths for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a theoretical analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125:295–299.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Li G, Papannagari R, Li M, Bingham J, Nha KW, Allred D, Gill T. Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:474–479.PubMedCrossRef Li G, Papannagari R, Li M, Bingham J, Nha KW, Allred D, Gill T. Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:474–479.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lipscomb AB Jr, Anderson AF, Norwig ED, Hovis WD, Brown DL. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:490–496.PubMedCrossRef Lipscomb AB Jr, Anderson AF, Norwig ED, Hovis WD, Brown DL. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Long-term results. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:490–496.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:320–328.PubMedCrossRef MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:320–328.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:587–593.PubMedCrossRef Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:587–593.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Margheritini F, Rihn JA, Mauro CS, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1164–1171.PubMedCrossRef Margheritini F, Rihn JA, Mauro CS, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1164–1171.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:312–317.PubMed McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:312–317.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterior cruciate ligament allograft reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:371–382.PubMedCrossRef Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Posterior cruciate ligament allograft reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:371–382.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M. Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:894–905.PubMedCrossRef Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M. Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:894–905.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:938–944. Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:938–944.
25.
go back to reference Park SE, Stamos BD, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1514–1519.PubMedCrossRef Park SE, Stamos BD, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1514–1519.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:35–38.PubMedCrossRef Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:35–38.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT. The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J. 2007;3:137–146.PubMedCrossRef Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT. The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J. 2007;3:137–146.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Richter M, Kiefer H, Hehl G, Kinzl L. Primary repair for posterior cruciate ligament injuries. An eight-year followup of fifty-three patients. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:298–305.PubMedCrossRef Richter M, Kiefer H, Hehl G, Kinzl L. Primary repair for posterior cruciate ligament injuries. An eight-year followup of fifty-three patients. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:298–305.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ritchie JR, Bergfeld JA, Kambic H, Manning T. Isolated sectioning of the medial and posteromedial capsular ligaments in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Influence on posterior tibial translation. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:389–394.PubMed Ritchie JR, Bergfeld JA, Kambic H, Manning T. Isolated sectioning of the medial and posteromedial capsular ligaments in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Influence on posterior tibial translation. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:389–394.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Schulte KR, Chu ET, Fu FH. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16:145–156.PubMedCrossRef Schulte KR, Chu ET, Fu FH. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16:145–156.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Seon JK, Song EK. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:27–32.PubMedCrossRef Seon JK, Song EK. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:27–32.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:276–283. Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:276–283.
33.
go back to reference Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W. Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:66–73.PubMedCrossRef Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W. Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:66–73.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW, Yuan LJ. Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury. 2002;33:815–821.PubMedCrossRef Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW, Yuan LJ. Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral instabilities of the knee. Injury. 2002;33:815–821.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS. Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury. 2004;35:1293–1299.PubMedCrossRef Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS. Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury. 2004;35:1293–1299.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical Technique: Aperture Fixation in PCL Reconstruction: Applying Biomechanics to Surgery
Authors
Thomas J. Gill IV, MD
Samuel K. Van de Velde, MD
Kaitlin M. Carroll, BS
William J. Robertson, MD
Benton E. Heyworth, MD
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2100-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2012 Go to the issue

Obituary

Obituary