Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Basic Research

Who Is Lost to Followup?: A Study of Patients with Distal Radius Fractures

Authors: Nirmal C. Tejwani, MD, Richelle C. Takemoto, MD, Gopi Nayak, BS, Brian Pahk, BS, Kenneth A. Egol, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity fracture, representing one-sixth of all fractures treated in emergency departments nationwide. Beyond the initial reduction and immobilization of these fractures, providing proper followup to ensure maintenance of the reduction and identify complications is necessary for optimal recovery of forearm and wrist functions. We sought to identify the clinical and demographic factors that characterize patients with distal radius fractures who do not return for followup and to assess the underlying causes for their poor followup rates. Compared with patients who were compliant with followup, those lost to followup had lower Physical and Mental Health scores on the SF-36 forms, more often were treated nonoperatively, and more likely had not surpassed secondary education. However, we found no difference between these two groups based on age, gender, mechanism of injury, marital status, or hand dominance. Early identification of patients who potentially are noncompliant can result in additional measures being taken to ensure the patient’s return to the treating hospital and physicians. This in turn will prevent complications attributable to lack of followup and allow more accurate assessment of results, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–146.PubMed Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–146.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gofton W, Liew A. Distal radius fractures: nonoperative and percutaneous pinning treatment options. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:175–185, v–vi.CrossRefPubMed Gofton W, Liew A. Distal radius fractures: nonoperative and percutaneous pinning treatment options. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:175–185, v–vi.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ilyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures: classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:167–173, v.CrossRefPubMed Ilyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures: classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:167–173, v.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:24.CrossRefPubMed MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1944–1951.CrossRefPubMed Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1944–1951.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McKay SD, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:916–922.CrossRefPubMed McKay SD, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:916–922.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Murnaghan ML, Buckley RE. Lost but not forgotten: patients lost to follow-up in a trauma database. Can J Surg. 2002;45:191–195.PubMed Murnaghan ML, Buckley RE. Lost but not forgotten: patients lost to follow-up in a trauma database. Can J Surg. 2002;45:191–195.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ. Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:254–257.CrossRefPubMed Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ. Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:254–257.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Norquist BM, Goldberg BA, Matsen FA 3rd. Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:838–842.PubMed Norquist BM, Goldberg BA, Matsen FA 3rd. Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:838–842.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(suppl 1):v–ix,1–154. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(suppl 1):v–ix,1–154.
11.
go back to reference Psaty BM, Cheadle A, Koepsell TD, Diehr P, Wickizer T, Curry S, VonKorff M, Perrin EB, Pearson DC, Wagner EH. Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:161–171.PubMed Psaty BM, Cheadle A, Koepsell TD, Diehr P, Wickizer T, Curry S, VonKorff M, Perrin EB, Pearson DC, Wagner EH. Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:161–171.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Smith JS, Watts HG. Methods for locating missing patients for the purpose of long-term clinical studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:431–438.PubMed Smith JS, Watts HG. Methods for locating missing patients for the purpose of long-term clinical studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:431–438.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Solway S, Beaton DE, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual. Toronto, Canada: Institute for Work and Health; 2002. Solway S, Beaton DE, McConnell S, Bombardier C. The DASH Outcome Measure User’s Manual. Toronto, Canada: Institute for Work and Health; 2002.
14.
go back to reference Turner RG, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Complications of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:217–228, vi.CrossRefPubMed Turner RG, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Complications of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:217–228, vi.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
17.
go back to reference Ware JE, Snow KS, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994. Ware JE, Snow KS, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
18.
go back to reference Zunzunegui MV, Beland F, Gutierrez-Cuadra P. Loss to follow-up in a longitudinal study on aging in Spain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:501–510.CrossRefPubMed Zunzunegui MV, Beland F, Gutierrez-Cuadra P. Loss to follow-up in a longitudinal study on aging in Spain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:501–510.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Who Is Lost to Followup?: A Study of Patients with Distal Radius Fractures
Authors
Nirmal C. Tejwani, MD
Richelle C. Takemoto, MD
Gopi Nayak, BS
Brian Pahk, BS
Kenneth A. Egol, MD
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0968-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2010 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Reply to Letter to the Editor

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2009

Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2009: Editorial Comment

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2009

The Learning Curve for Adopting Hip Resurfacing Among Hip Specialists

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2009

Failure of the Durom Metasul® Acetabular Component