Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Article

The Anatomy of the Acetabulum: What is Normal?

Authors: Viktor Krebs, MD, Stephen J. Incavo, MD, William H. Shields, BS

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Published studies of the human hip make frequent reference to the normal pelvis and acetabulum. However, other than qualitative descriptions we found no clinically applicable published references describing a normal pelvis and acetabulum; such information is important for designing certain kinds of implants (eg, reconstruction cages). We describe a method to quantify, average, and apply data gathered from normal human specimens to create a standard representation of the ilium and ischium. One hundred healthy hemipelves from 50 human skeletons were evaluated. We measured angles and distances between major anatomic landmarks in the pelvis. The data collected were analyzed for variance and averaged to create a normal topographic map. Finally, we examined several commercially available acetabular reconstruction cages to determine the fit to the anatomically determined normal pelvis. These results provide a representation of true acetabular geometry and may serve as the basis for future acetabular reconstruction cage design.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Attias N, Lindsey RW, Starr AJ, Borer D, Bridges K, Hipp JA. The use of a virtual three-dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1520–1523.PubMedCrossRef Attias N, Lindsey RW, Starr AJ, Borer D, Bridges K, Hipp JA. The use of a virtual three-dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1520–1523.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Benedetti JA, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations of plate-screw fixation of the anterior column of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:264–272.PubMedCrossRef Benedetti JA, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations of plate-screw fixation of the anterior column of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:264–272.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brinckmann P, Hoefert H, Jongen HT. Sex difference in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. J Biomech. 1981;14:427–430.PubMedCrossRef Brinckmann P, Hoefert H, Jongen HT. Sex difference in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. J Biomech. 1981;14:427–430.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 200;82:315–321. D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 200;82:315–321.
6.
go back to reference Govsa F, Ozer MA, Ozgur Z. Morphologic features of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:453–461.PubMedCrossRef Govsa F, Ozer MA, Ozgur Z. Morphologic features of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:453–461.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Husmann O, Rubin RJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:444–450.PubMedCrossRef Husmann O, Rubin RJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:444–450.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lavernia CJ, Cook CC, Hernandez RA, Sierra RJ, Rossi MD. Neurovascular injuries in acetabular reconstruction cage surgery: an anatomical study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:124–132.PubMedCrossRef Lavernia CJ, Cook CC, Hernandez RA, Sierra RJ, Rossi MD. Neurovascular injuries in acetabular reconstruction cage surgery: an anatomical study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:124–132.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.PubMedCrossRef Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Meldrum R, Johansen RL. Safe screw placement in acetabular revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:953–960.PubMedCrossRef Meldrum R, Johansen RL. Safe screw placement in acetabular revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:953–960.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mensforth RP, Latimer BM. Hamann-Todd Collection aging studies: osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol.1989:80:461–479.PubMedCrossRef Mensforth RP, Latimer BM. Hamann-Todd Collection aging studies: osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol.1989:80:461–479.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148–165.PubMed Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148–165.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke MR. Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:287–297.PubMed Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke MR. Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:287–297.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Tague RG. Variation in pelvic size between males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989;80:59–71.PubMedCrossRef Tague RG. Variation in pelvic size between males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989;80:59–71.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wasielewski RC, Cooperstein LA, Kruger MP, Rubash HE. Acetabular anatomy and the transacetabular fixation of screws in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:501–508.PubMed Wasielewski RC, Cooperstein LA, Kruger MP, Rubash HE. Acetabular anatomy and the transacetabular fixation of screws in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:501–508.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The Anatomy of the Acetabulum: What is Normal?
Authors
Viktor Krebs, MD
Stephen J. Incavo, MD
William H. Shields, BS
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0317-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2009 Go to the issue

Symposium: Technical Aspects of Hip Reconstruction

Technical Aspects of Hip Reconstruction: Editorial Comment