Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman and V Voudris, Section Editors)

Timing and Outcomes of PCI in the TAVR Era

Authors: Konstantinos V. Voudris, MD, PhD, Peter Petropulos, MD, Panagiotis Karyofillis, MD, Konstantinos Charitakis, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of review

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). As the number of patients referred for TAVR increases, so does the prevalence of untreated obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in the population under evaluation. Despite the high prevalence of CAD in patients treated with TAVR, the management strategy of concomitant CAD in these patients remains an area of considerable uncertainty.

Recent findings

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CAD and severe AS has been shown to be feasible and safe. Whether revascularization before, during, or after TAVR is optimal remains a subject of debate. All three approaches represent valid strategies with advantages and disadvantages that need to be carefully weighed on an individual basis.

Summary

Current expert opinions recommend that PCI should be performed before or at the time of TAVR as long as the risk of the procedure does not outweigh the potential benefits. The results of large clinical trials evaluating the optimal revascularization time are closely awaited.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carità P, et al. Aortic stenosis: insights on pathogenesis and clinical implications. J Geriatr Cardiol: JGC. 2016;13(6):489–98.PubMedPubMedCentral Carità P, et al. Aortic stenosis: insights on pathogenesis and clinical implications. J Geriatr Cardiol: JGC. 2016;13(6):489–98.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kobayashi J. Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(12):663–8.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi J. Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(12):663–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Horne A Jr, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: historical perspectives, current evidence, and future directions. Am Heart J. 2014;168(4):414–23.CrossRefPubMed Horne A Jr, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: historical perspectives, current evidence, and future directions. Am Heart J. 2014;168(4):414–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goel SS, et al. Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease—implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed Goel SS, et al. Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease—implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Paradis JM, et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: what do we know? What don’t we know? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(31):2069–82.CrossRefPubMed Paradis JM, et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: what do we know? What don’t we know? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(31):2069–82.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smith CR, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–98.CrossRefPubMed Smith CR, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–98.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Adams DH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1790–8.CrossRefPubMed Adams DH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1790–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Tjang YS, et al. Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(3):469–74.CrossRefPubMed Tjang YS, et al. Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(3):469–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Thalji NM, et al. The prognostic impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during aortic valve surgery: implications for revascularization in the transcatheter era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(2):451–60.CrossRefPubMed Thalji NM, et al. The prognostic impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during aortic valve surgery: implications for revascularization in the transcatheter era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(2):451–60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dewey TM, et al. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(3):758–67. discussion 767CrossRefPubMed Dewey TM, et al. Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(3):758–67. discussion 767CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Khawaja MZ, et al. The effect of coronary artery disease defined by quantitative coronary angiography and SYNTAX score upon outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Edwards bioprosthesis. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(4):450–5.CrossRefPubMed Khawaja MZ, et al. The effect of coronary artery disease defined by quantitative coronary angiography and SYNTAX score upon outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Edwards bioprosthesis. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(4):450–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Snow TM, et al. Management of concomitant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the United Kingdom TAVI Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:253–60.CrossRefPubMed Snow TM, et al. Management of concomitant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the United Kingdom TAVI Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:253–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chauhan D, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): is preoperative coronary revascularization necessary? J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(12):E179–e184.PubMed Chauhan D, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): is preoperative coronary revascularization necessary? J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(12):E179–e184.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Puymirat, E., et al. Impact of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the FRANCE-2 registry. Clin Cardiol. 2017. Puymirat, E., et al. Impact of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from the FRANCE-2 registry. Clin Cardiol. 2017.
16.
go back to reference Sankaramangalam K, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 6(10). Sankaramangalam K, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 6(10).
17.
go back to reference D’Ascenzo F, et al. Mid-term prognostic value of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of adjusted observational results. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2528–32.CrossRefPubMed D’Ascenzo F, et al. Mid-term prognostic value of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of adjusted observational results. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2528–32.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Paradis JM et al. Impact of coronary artery disease severity assessed with the SYNTAX score on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. 6(2). Paradis JM et al. Impact of coronary artery disease severity assessed with the SYNTAX score on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. 6(2).
19.
go back to reference Danson E, et al. Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(5):276–85.CrossRefPubMed Danson E, et al. Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(5):276–85.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stanojevic D, et al. Intravenous adenosine infusion is safe and well tolerated during coronary fractional flow reserve assessment in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(9):357–61.PubMed Stanojevic D, et al. Intravenous adenosine infusion is safe and well tolerated during coronary fractional flow reserve assessment in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(9):357–61.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(23):2440–92.CrossRefPubMed Nishimura RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(23):2440–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference •• Ramee S, et al. The rationale for performance of coronary angiography and stenting before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from the Interventional Section Leadership Council of the American College of Cardiology. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(23):2371–5. A report from the Interventional Section Leadership Council of the American College of Cardiology proposing an algorithm to evaluate TAVR candidates with CAD. •• Ramee S, et al. The rationale for performance of coronary angiography and stenting before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from the Interventional Section Leadership Council of the American College of Cardiology. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(23):2371–5. A report from the Interventional Section Leadership Council of the American College of Cardiology proposing an algorithm to evaluate TAVR candidates with CAD.
23.
go back to reference Wenaweser P, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk according to treatment modality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2151–62.CrossRefPubMed Wenaweser P, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk according to treatment modality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2151–62.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Goel SS, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2012;125(8):1005–13.CrossRefPubMed Goel SS, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2012;125(8):1005–13.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Millan-Iturbe O et al. Coronary artery disease, revascularization, and clinical outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: real-world results from the East Denmark Heart Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. Millan-Iturbe O et al. Coronary artery disease, revascularization, and clinical outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: real-world results from the East Denmark Heart Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017.
26.
go back to reference Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(4):581–6.CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Comparison of outcomes in patients having isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus combined with preprocedural percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(4):581–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gasparetto V, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a selective strategy for coronary artery revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81(2):376–83.CrossRefPubMed Gasparetto V, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a selective strategy for coronary artery revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81(2):376–83.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ussia GP, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insight from the Italian CoreValve Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(3):943–50.CrossRefPubMed Ussia GP, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insight from the Italian CoreValve Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(3):943–50.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gautier M, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and on procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(5):549–55.CrossRefPubMed Gautier M, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease on indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and on procedural outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(5):549–55.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Witberg G, et al. Effect of coronary artery disease severity and revascularization completeness on 2-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatether aortic valve replacement. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26(7):573–82.CrossRefPubMed Witberg G, et al. Effect of coronary artery disease severity and revascularization completeness on 2-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatether aortic valve replacement. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26(7):573–82.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Witberg G, et al. The prognostic effects of coronary disease severity and completeness of revascularization on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(14):1428–35.CrossRefPubMed Witberg G, et al. The prognostic effects of coronary disease severity and completeness of revascularization on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(14):1428–35.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Wenaweser P, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(5):541–8.CrossRefPubMed Wenaweser P, et al. Impact of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(5):541–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Conradi L, et al. First experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011;100(4):311–6.CrossRefPubMed Conradi L, et al. First experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011;100(4):311–6.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference van Rosendael PJ, et al. Timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(12):1726–32.CrossRefPubMed van Rosendael PJ, et al. Timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(12):1726–32.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kotronias RA et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with or without percutaneous coronary artery revascularization strategy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. 6(6). Kotronias RA et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with or without percutaneous coronary artery revascularization strategy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. 6(6).
36.
go back to reference Barbanti M et al. Optimized screening of coronary artery disease with invasive coronary angiography and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2017. 10(8). Barbanti M et al. Optimized screening of coronary artery disease with invasive coronary angiography and ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2017. 10(8).
37.
go back to reference Penkalla A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with elective coronary artery stenting: a simultaneous approachdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(6):1083–9.CrossRefPubMed Penkalla A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with elective coronary artery stenting: a simultaneous approachdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(6):1083–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Bajaj A, et al. Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2017;46(2):92–9.CrossRefPubMed Bajaj A, et al. Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2017;46(2):92–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Zajarias A, Eltchaninoff H, Cribier A. Successful coronary intervention after percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(4):522–4.CrossRefPubMed Zajarias A, Eltchaninoff H, Cribier A. Successful coronary intervention after percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(4):522–4.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Geist V, Sherif MA, Khattab AA. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention after implantation of a CoreValve percutaneous aortic valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(1):61–7.CrossRefPubMed Geist V, Sherif MA, Khattab AA. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention after implantation of a CoreValve percutaneous aortic valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(1):61–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Van Mieghem NM, et al. Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(8):867–75.CrossRefPubMed Van Mieghem NM, et al. Complete revascularization is not a prerequisite for success in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation practice. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(8):867–75.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Pasic M, et al. Combined elective percutaneous coronary intervention and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(4):463–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pasic M, et al. Combined elective percutaneous coronary intervention and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(4):463–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Allali A, et al. Incidence, feasibility and outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding prosthesis. Results from a single center experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016;17(6):391–8.CrossRefPubMed Allali A, et al. Incidence, feasibility and outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding prosthesis. Results from a single center experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016;17(6):391–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Timing and Outcomes of PCI in the TAVR Era
Authors
Konstantinos V. Voudris, MD, PhD
Peter Petropulos, MD
Panagiotis Karyofillis, MD
Konstantinos Charitakis, MD
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1092-8464
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3189
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-018-0619-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 3/2018 Go to the issue

Arrhythmia (G Upadhyay, Section Editor)

Ablation Approaches for Ventricular Fibrillation

Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman and V Voudris, Section Editors)

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Diagnosis and Management