Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section editor)

Principles of Electrical Stimulation and Dorsal Column Mapping as it Relates to Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Overview

Authors: Chitra Ramasubbu, Artemus Flagg II, Kayode Williams

Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The last 30 years have witnessed the growth of spinal cord stimulation as a treatment modality for an increasing number of chronic pain conditions. In spite of this growth, one of the greatest criticisms is the lack of concrete evidence for the mechanism of action. With the ever increasing enlightenment with regards to the neurophysiology of pain, and the development of more dynamic neuroimaging techniques, the opportunity to better define the mechanism of action of the spinal cord stimulator will continue to expand. In the interim, clinicians will benefit from the consolidation of the available knowledge that will enhance the effective use of the device. This review serves to provide an overview of the key principles of electrical stimulation and dorsal column mapping as it relates to spinal cord stimulation. We aim at enhancing the understanding regarding the basis for successful placement of leads and manipulation of electrical parameters.
Literature
1.
Kellaway P. The part played by electric fish in the early history of bioelectricity and electrotherapy. Bull Hist Med. 1946;20:112–37.PubMed
2.
3.
Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:489–91.PubMed
4.
Cruccu G. Treatment of painful neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:531–5.PubMed
5.
• North RB, Kumar K, Wallace MS, Henderson JM, Shipley J, Hernandez J, et al. Spinal cord stimulation vs re-operation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (EVIDENCE study). Neuromodulation. 2011;14:330–5. discussion 335–6. This is the first multi-center randomized control trial of SCS and re-operation and provides evidence for the value of SCS in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. Spinal cord stimulation vs conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007;132:179–88.PubMedCrossRef
7.
• Pluijms WA, Slangen R, Bakkers M, Faber CG, Merkies IS, Kessels AG, et al. Pain relief and quality-of-life improvement after spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(4):623–9. This is the first pilot study confirming the efficacy of SCS in the treatment of intractable painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The authors also sought to evaluate the predictive values of pre-operative clinical sensory testing.PubMedCrossRef
8.
• Williams KA, Gonzalez-Fernandez M, Hamzehzadeh S, Wilkinson I, Erdek MA, Plunkett A, et al. A multi-center analysis evaluating factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic pain patients. Pain Med. 2011;12:1142–53. This multicenter retrospective analysis provides insight into the factors associated with the outcome of the trial of the SCS.PubMedCrossRef
9.
•• van Eijs F, Smits H, Geurts JW, Kessels AG, Kemler MA, van Kleef M, et al. Brushed-evoked allodynia predicts outcome of spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:164–9. This study provides evidence for the value of brushed evoked potentials in predicting outcome of SCS treatment in CRPS-1.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hord ED, Cohen SP, Cosgrove GR, Ahmed SU, Vallejo R, Chang Y, et al. The predictive value of sympathetic block for the success of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:626–32.PubMedCrossRef
11.
McNeal DR. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1976;23:329–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Rattay F. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1986;33:974–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Ranck JB. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res. 1975;98:417–40.PubMedCrossRef
14.
BeMent SL, Ranck JB. A quantitative study of electrical stimulation of the myelinated fibers with monopolar electrodes. Exp Neurol. 1969;24:147–70.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Rijkhoff NJM, Koldewijn EL, Van Kerrebroeck PEV, Debbruyne FMJ, Wijkstra H. Acute animal studies on the use of an anodal block to reduce urethral resistance in sacral root stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng. 1994;2:92–9.CrossRef
16.
Wee AS, Leis AA, Kuhn AR, Gilbert RW. Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies? Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;40:387–91.PubMed
17.
Wee AS. Anodal excitation of intact peripheral nerves in humans. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;41:71–7.PubMed
18.
Holsheimer J, Wesselink WA. Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997;35:493–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Holsheimer J. Which neuronal elements are activated directly by spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2002;5:25–31.PubMedCrossRef
20.
He J, Barolat G, Ketcik B. Stimulation usage range for chronic pain management. Analgesia. 1994;1:75–80.
21.
North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes. Part 1: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:381–9.PubMed
22.
Feirabend HKP, Choufoer H, Ploeger S, Holsheimer J, Van Gool JD. Morphometry of the human superficial dorsal and dorsolateral column fibers: significance to spinal cord stimulation. Brain. 2002;125:1137–49.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Merrill DR, Bikson M, Jefferys JG. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods. 2005;141:171–98.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Yearwood TL. Neuropathic extremity pain and spinal cord stimulation. Pain Med. 2006;7(1):S97–S102.CrossRef
25.
Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane currents and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952;117:500–44.PubMed
26.
Strujik JJ, Holsheimer J, Boom HB. Epidural spinal cord stimulation: calculation of field potentials with special reference to dorsal column nerve fibers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38:104–10.CrossRef
27.
Geddes LA, Baker LE. The specific resistance of biological material-A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng. 1967;5:271–93.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Barolat G. Epidural spinal cord stimulation: anatomical and electrical properties of the intraspinal structures relevant to spinal cord stimulation and clinical correlations. Neuromodulation. 1998;2:63–71.CrossRef
29.
Holsheimer J, Barolat G, Strujik JJ, He J. Significance of the spinal cord position in spinal cord stimulation. Acta Nezrrochir. 1995;64(Suppl):119–24.CrossRef
30.
Holsheimer J, den Boer JA, Struijk JJ, et al. MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal. Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:951–9.PubMed
31.
Tulgar M, Barolat G, Ketcik B. Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 1. Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1100 combinations. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1993;61:129–39.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Holsheimer J, Strujik JJ. How do geometric factors influence epidural spinal cord stimulation? A quantitative analysis by computer modeling. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1991;56:234–49.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Strujik JJ, Holsheimer J, Barolat G, He J, Boom HB. Paresthesia thresholds in spinal cord stimulation: a comparison of theoretical results with clinical data. IEEE Trans Rehab End. 1993;1:101–8.CrossRef
34.
Tulgar M, Barolat G, Ketcik B. Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 2. Usage ranges resulting from 3000 combinations. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;61:140–5.CrossRef
35.
Tulgar M, Barolat G, Ketcik B. Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 3. Topographical distribution of paresthesia– a preliminary analysis of 266 combinations with contacts implanted in the midcervical and midthoracic vertebral levels. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;61:146–55.CrossRef
36.
Buonocore M, Bonezzi C, Barolat G. Neurophysiological evidence of antidromic activation of large myelinated fibers in lower limbs during spinal cord stimulation. Spine. 2008;33:E90–3.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Barolat G, Zeme S, Ketcik B. Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1991;56(2):77–103.
38.
Holsherimer J, Barolat G. Spinal geometry and paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 1998;3:129–6.
39.
Holsheimer J, Struijk J, Wesselink W. Analysis of spinal cord stimulation and design of epidural electrodes by computer modeling. Neuromodulation. 1998;1:14–8.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Barolat G, Massaro F, He J, Zeme S, Ketcik B. Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:233–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Principles of Electrical Stimulation and Dorsal Column Mapping as it Relates to Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Overview
Authors
Chitra Ramasubbu
Artemus Flagg II
Kayode Williams
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0315-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2013 Go to the issue

Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section editor)

Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Spinal (Neck) Pain

Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section editor)

Celiac Plexus Block and Neurolysis for Pancreatic Cancer

Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section Editor)

Complementary and Alternative Treatments for Chronic Pelvic Pain

Anesthetic Techniques in Pain Management (KA Williams, Section editor)

Functional Imaging for Interpretation of Pain Pathways: Current Clinical Application/Relevance and Future Initiatives

Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (MS Matharu, Section editor)

The Psychiatric Comorbidities of Cluster Headache