Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports 3/2013

01-09-2013 | Hot Topic

Computational Anatomy in the Study of Bone Structure

Authors: Julio Carballido-Gamio, Daniel P. Nicolella

Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major public health threat for millions of Americans with billions of dollars per year of national direct costs for osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis results in a decrease in overall bone mass and subsequent increase in the risk of bone fracture. Bone strength arises from the combination of bone size and shape, the distribution of bone mass throughout the structure, and the quality of the bone material. Advances in medical imaging have enabled a comprehensive assessment of bone structure through the analysis of high-resolution scans of relevant anatomical sites, eg, the proximal femur. However, conventional imaging analysis techniques use predefined regions of interest that do not take full advantage of such scans. Recently, computational anatomy, a set of imaging-based analysis algorithms, has emerged as a promising technique in studies of osteoporosis. Computational anatomy enables analyses that are not biased to one particular region and provide a more complete assessment of the whole structure. In this article, we review studies that have used computational anatomy to investigate the structure of the proximal femur in relation to age, fracture, osteoporotic treatment, and spaceflight effects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH consensus statement. 2000;17:1–36. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH consensus statement. 2000;17:1–36.
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone. 2003;32:468–73.PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. Bone. 2003;32:468–73.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Foss NB, Kehlet H. Mortality analysis in hip fracture patients: implications for design of future outcome trials. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:24–9.PubMedCrossRef Foss NB, Kehlet H. Mortality analysis in hip fracture patients: implications for design of future outcome trials. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:24–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Blake GM, Fogelman I. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:509–17.PubMedCrossRef Blake GM, Fogelman I. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:509–17.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Genant HK, Engelke K, Prevrhal S. Advanced CT bone imaging in osteoporosis. Rheumatology. 2008;47 Suppl 4:iv9–iv16.PubMedCrossRef Genant HK, Engelke K, Prevrhal S. Advanced CT bone imaging in osteoporosis. Rheumatology. 2008;47 Suppl 4:iv9–iv16.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech. 1998;31:125–33.PubMedCrossRef Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech. 1998;31:125–33.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat R. 2005:219–28. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat R. 2005:219–28.
10.
go back to reference Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew PM, Poole KE. High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Med Image Anal. 2010;14:276–90.PubMedCrossRef Treece GM, Gee AH, Mayhew PM, Poole KE. High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Med Image Anal. 2010;14:276–90.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Carballido-Gamio J, Majumdar S. Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2006;4:64–70.PubMedCrossRef Carballido-Gamio J, Majumdar S. Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2006;4:64–70.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET, et al. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1307–14.PubMedCrossRef Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET, et al. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1307–14.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krug R, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S, Link TM. High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:601–21.PubMedCrossRef Krug R, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S, Link TM. High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:601–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Newitt DC, van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S. Processing and analysis of in vivo high-resolution MR images of trabecular bone for longitudinal studies: reproducibility of structural measures and micro-finite element analysis derived mechanical properties. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:278–87.PubMedCrossRef Newitt DC, van Rietbergen B, Majumdar S. Processing and analysis of in vivo high-resolution MR images of trabecular bone for longitudinal studies: reproducibility of structural measures and micro-finite element analysis derived mechanical properties. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:278–87.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wehrli FW. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:390–409.PubMedCrossRef Wehrli FW. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:390–409.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rajapakse CS, Leonard MB, Bhagat YA, et al. Micro-MR imaging-based computational biomechanics demonstrates reduction in cortical and trabecular bone strength after renal transplantation. Radiology. 2012;262:912–20.PubMedCrossRef Rajapakse CS, Leonard MB, Bhagat YA, et al. Micro-MR imaging-based computational biomechanics demonstrates reduction in cortical and trabecular bone strength after renal transplantation. Radiology. 2012;262:912–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wehrli FW, Hopkins JA, Hwang SN, et al. Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry. Radiology. 2000;217:527–38.PubMed Wehrli FW, Hopkins JA, Hwang SN, et al. Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry. Radiology. 2000;217:527–38.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Thompson PM, Apostolova LG. Computational anatomical methods as applied to ageing and dementia. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(Spec No 2):S78–91.PubMedCrossRef Thompson PM, Apostolova LG. Computational anatomical methods as applied to ageing and dementia. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(Spec No 2):S78–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Robbins S, Evans AC, Collins DL, Whitesides S. Tuning and comparing spatial normalization methods. Med Image Anal. 2004;8:311–23.PubMedCrossRef Robbins S, Evans AC, Collins DL, Whitesides S. Tuning and comparing spatial normalization methods. Med Image Anal. 2004;8:311–23.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Davies RH, Twining CJ, Cootes TF, et al. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:525–37.PubMedCrossRef Davies RH, Twining CJ, Cootes TF, et al. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:525–37.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gregory JS, Testi D, Stewart A, et al. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:5–11.PubMedCrossRef Gregory JS, Testi D, Stewart A, et al. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:5–11.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE, et al. Bone shape, structure, and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture: a pilot study investigating the combination of risk factors. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:591–7.PubMedCrossRef Gregory JS, Stewart A, Undrill PE, et al. Bone shape, structure, and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture: a pilot study investigating the combination of risk factors. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:591–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Baker-LePain JC, Luker KR, Lynch JA, et al. Active shape modeling of the hip in the prediction of incident hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:468–74.PubMedCrossRef Baker-LePain JC, Luker KR, Lynch JA, et al. Active shape modeling of the hip in the prediction of incident hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:468–74.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goodyear SR, Barr RJ, McCloskey E, et al. Can we improve the prediction of hip fracture by assessing bone structure using shape and appearance modeling? Bone. 2012;53:188–93.PubMedCrossRef Goodyear SR, Barr RJ, McCloskey E, et al. Can we improve the prediction of hip fracture by assessing bone structure using shape and appearance modeling? Bone. 2012;53:188–93.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Li W, Kezele I, Collins DL, et al. Voxel-based modeling and quantification of the proximal femur using inter-subject registration of quantitative CT images. Bone. 2007;41:888–95.PubMedCrossRef Li W, Kezele I, Collins DL, et al. Voxel-based modeling and quantification of the proximal femur using inter-subject registration of quantitative CT images. Bone. 2007;41:888–95.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Li W, Kornak J, Harris T, et al. Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping. Bone. 2009;44:596–602.PubMedCrossRef Li W, Kornak J, Harris T, et al. Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping. Bone. 2009;44:596–602.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Poole KE, Treece GM, Mayhew PM, et al. Cortical thickness mapping to identify focal osteoporosis in patients with hip fracture. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38466.PubMedCrossRef Poole KE, Treece GM, Mayhew PM, et al. Cortical thickness mapping to identify focal osteoporosis in patients with hip fracture. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38466.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I, et al. Geometry, density distribution and internal structure of the proximal femur in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. Minneapolis, MN: ASBMR; 2012. Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I, et al. Geometry, density distribution and internal structure of the proximal femur in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. Minneapolis, MN: ASBMR; 2012.
29.
go back to reference •• Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I, et al. Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:537–46. Article demonstrating the spatial relationship of vBMD in the proximal femur with incident hip fracture and aging in women.PubMedCrossRef •• Carballido-Gamio J, Harnish R, Saeed I, et al. Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:537–46. Article demonstrating the spatial relationship of vBMD in the proximal femur with incident hip fracture and aging in women.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Davatzikos C, Vaillant M, Resnick SM, et al. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:88–97.PubMedCrossRef Davatzikos C, Vaillant M, Resnick SM, et al. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:88–97.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Johannesdottir F, Poole KE, Reeve J, et al. Distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck and hip fracture: a prospective case–control analysis of 143 incident hip fractures: the AGES-REYKJAVIK Study. Bone. 2011;48:1268–76.PubMedCrossRef Johannesdottir F, Poole KE, Reeve J, et al. Distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck and hip fracture: a prospective case–control analysis of 143 incident hip fractures: the AGES-REYKJAVIK Study. Bone. 2011;48:1268–76.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference •• Poole KE, Treece GM, Ridgway GR, et al. Targeted regeneration of bone in the osteoporotic human femur. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16190. Article demonstrating localized osteoporosis treatment effects on cortical bone thickness in the proximal femur.PubMedCrossRef •• Poole KE, Treece GM, Ridgway GR, et al. Targeted regeneration of bone in the osteoporotic human femur. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16190. Article demonstrating localized osteoporosis treatment effects on cortical bone thickness in the proximal femur.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bryan R, Nair PB, Taylor M. Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. J Biomech. 2009;42:2171–6.PubMedCrossRef Bryan R, Nair PB, Taylor M. Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. J Biomech. 2009;42:2171–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rueckert D, Frangi AF, Schnabel JA. Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:1014–25.PubMedCrossRef Rueckert D, Frangi AF, Schnabel JA. Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:1014–25.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference •• Nicolella DP. Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modeling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2012;15:101–10. Article demonstrating the feasibility of parametric finite element modeling of the proximal femur.CrossRef •• Nicolella DP. Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modeling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2012;15:101–10. Article demonstrating the feasibility of parametric finite element modeling of the proximal femur.CrossRef
36.
37.
go back to reference Li W, Kornak J, Harris T, et al. Hip fracture risk estimation based on principal component analysis of QCT atlas: a preliminary study. SPIE Medl Imaging. 2009 Li W, Kornak J, Harris T, et al. Hip fracture risk estimation based on principal component analysis of QCT atlas: a preliminary study. SPIE Medl Imaging. 2009
38.
go back to reference Li W, Kornak J, Harris TB, et al. Bone fracture risk estimation based on image similarity. Bone. 2009;45:560–7.PubMedCrossRef Li W, Kornak J, Harris TB, et al. Bone fracture risk estimation based on image similarity. Bone. 2009;45:560–7.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Fritscher K, Grunerbl A, Hanni M, et al. Trabecular bone analysis in CT and X-ray images of the proximal femur for the assessment of local bone quality. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1560–75.PubMedCrossRef Fritscher K, Grunerbl A, Hanni M, et al. Trabecular bone analysis in CT and X-ray images of the proximal femur for the assessment of local bone quality. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:1560–75.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Schuler B, Fritscher KD, Kuhn V, et al. Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models. Med Phys. 2010;37:2560–71.PubMedCrossRef Schuler B, Fritscher KD, Kuhn V, et al. Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models. Med Phys. 2010;37:2560–71.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Leber S, Fritscher KD, Schmoelz W, Schubert R. Statistical model based analysis of bone mineral density of lumbar spine. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009;4:239–43.PubMedCrossRef Leber S, Fritscher KD, Schmoelz W, Schubert R. Statistical model based analysis of bone mineral density of lumbar spine. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009;4:239–43.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Whitmarsh T, Fritscher KD, Humbert L, et al. A statistical model of shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:393–400.PubMed Whitmarsh T, Fritscher KD, Humbert L, et al. A statistical model of shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:393–400.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Bredbenner TL, Potter R, Mason RL, et al. Investigation of statistical shape and density modeling as a discriminator for clinical fracture risk. Toronto, CA: ASBMR; 2010. p. S83. Bredbenner TL, Potter R, Mason RL, et al. Investigation of statistical shape and density modeling as a discriminator for clinical fracture risk. Toronto, CA: ASBMR; 2010. p. S83.
44.
go back to reference Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study–a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26:569–85.PubMedCrossRef Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study–a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26:569–85.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bredbenner TL, Mason RL, Havill LM, et al. Investigating fracture risk classifiers based on statistical shape and density modeling and the MrOS data set. San Francisco, CA: ORS; 2012. Bredbenner TL, Mason RL, Havill LM, et al. Investigating fracture risk classifiers based on statistical shape and density modeling and the MrOS data set. San Francisco, CA: ORS; 2012.
46.
go back to reference Whitmarsh T, Fritscher KD, Humbert L, et al. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration. Bone. 2012;51:896–901.PubMedCrossRef Whitmarsh T, Fritscher KD, Humbert L, et al. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration. Bone. 2012;51:896–901.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Carballido-Gamio J, Folkesson J, Karampinos DC, et al. Generation of an atlas of the proximal femur and its application to trabecular bone analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:1181–91.PubMedCrossRef Carballido-Gamio J, Folkesson J, Karampinos DC, et al. Generation of an atlas of the proximal femur and its application to trabecular bone analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:1181–91.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computational Anatomy in the Study of Bone Structure
Authors
Julio Carballido-Gamio
Daniel P. Nicolella
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Electronic ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-013-0148-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Current Osteoporosis Reports 3/2013 Go to the issue

Future Therapeutics (P Miller, Section Editor)

Osteoporosis and Cancer

Nutrition and Lifestyle in Osteoporosis (S Ferrari, Section Editor)

Vitamin B12, Folic Acid, and Bone

Nutrition and Lifestyle in Osteoporosis (S Ferrari, Section Editor)

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Their Relation with Bone and Muscle Health in Adults

Nutrition and Lifestyle in Osteoporosis (S Ferrari, Section Editor)

Influence of Hormonal Appetite and Energy Regulators on Bone

Evaluation and Management (M Kleerekoper, Section Editor)

Vitamin D and Skeletal Growth and Development