Top

Published in:

01-05-2014 | Obesity (J McCaffery, Section Editor)

Review of Innovations in Digital Health Technology to Promote Weight Control

Authors: J. Graham Thomas, Dale S. Bond

Published in: Current Diabetes Reports | Issue 5/2014

Abstract

Advances in technology have contributed to the obesity epidemic and worsened health by reducing opportunities for physical activity and by the proliferation of inexpensive calorie-dense foods. However, much of the same technology can be used to counter these troublesome trends by fostering the development and maintenance of healthy eating and physical activity habits. In contrast to intensive face-to-face treatments, technology-based interventions also have the potential to reach large numbers of individuals at low cost. The purpose of this review is to discuss studies in which digital technology has been used for behavioral weight control, report on advances in consumer technology that are widely adopted but insufficiently tested, and explore potential future directions for both. Web-based, mobile (eg, smartphone), virtual reality, and gaming technologies are the focus of discussion. The best evidence exists to support the use of digital technology for self-monitoring of weight-related behaviors and outcomes. However, studies are underway that will provide additional, important information regarding how best to apply digital technology for behavioral weight control.

Freeman C, Louçã F. As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

Parker JC, Thorson E. Health communication in the new media landscape. New York: Springer Publishing; 2009.

Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280:1371–4.PubMedCrossRef

Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081–93.PubMedCrossRef

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults—United States, 2001 and 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1209–12.

Ford ES, Kohl HW, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:608–14.PubMedCrossRef

Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:13–27.PubMedCrossRef

Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among us adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307:491–7.PubMedCrossRef

Withrow D, Alter DA. The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity. Obes Rev. 2011;12:131–41.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815–25.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K, et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:824–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34:841–59.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Tsai AG, Wadden TA, Volger S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention to treat obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37 Suppl 1:S31–7.CrossRef

14.

Lee JS, Sheer JL, Lopez N, Rosenbaum S. Coverage of obesity treatment: a state-by-state analysis of Medicaid and state insurance laws. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:596–604.PubMedCentralPubMed

15.

Topol EJ, Topol EJ. The creative destruction of medicine: how the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books; 2012.

16.

Tufano JT, Karras BT. Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e58.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

17.

Duggan M, Smith A. Cell Internet Use 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; Sept 16, 2013. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Cell-Internet.aspx, Accessed September 30, 2013.

18.

File T. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Current Population Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 2013;20–568.

19.

Smith A. Smartphone Ownership—2013 Update. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; June 5, 2013. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smartphone-Ownership-2013.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

20.

Zickuhr K. Tablet Ownership 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. June 10, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tablet-Ownership-2013.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

21.

Global System for Mobile Communications Association. The Mobile Economy 2013. Global System for Mobile Communications Association, London, UK. 2013. Available at: http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/GSMA%20Mobile%20Economy%202013.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2013.

22.

Kellogg D. Among Mobile Phone Users, Hispanics, Asians are Most-Likely Smartphone Owners in the U.S.” Nielsen News, Online + Mobile. 2011. Available at: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/among-mobile-phone-users-hispanics-asians-are-most-likely-smartphone-owners-in-the-u-s/. Accessed September 30, 2013.

23.

Calzada PJ, Anderson-Worts P. The obesity epidemic: are minority individuals equally affected? Prim Care. 2009;36:307–17.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 15, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx, Accessed September 30, 2013.

25.

Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Mobile Health 2012. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2012. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Mobile-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

26.

Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 28, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

27.

Fox S. Pew Internet: Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; July 1, 2013. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2011/November/Pew-Internet-Health.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

28.

Zickuhr K, Smith S. Digital Differences. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; April, 2012. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences/Main-Report/Internet-adoption-over-time.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2013.

29.

Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.PubMedCrossRef

30.•

Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:92–102. This review highlights the importance of self-monitoring for weight control, and contains a discussion of the role of self-monitoring technology. The review also provides recommendations for the design of future studies to best enhance our understanding of why and how self-monitoring is effective for weight control.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

31.

Wing RR, Crane MM, Thomas JG, Kumar R, Weinberg B. Improving weight loss outcomes of community interventions by incorporating behavioral strategies. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2513–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

32.

Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1620–5.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Arem H, Irwin M. A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e236–43.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

34.

Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11:306–21.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Winett RA, Tate DF, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG. Long-term weight gain prevention: a theoretically based Internet approach. Prev Med. 2005;41:629–41.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Svetkey LP, Stevens VJ, Brantley PJ, et al. Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1139–48.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Krukowski RA, Harvey-Berino J, Ashikaga T, Thomas CS, Micco N. Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:775–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

38.

Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity. 2010;18:308–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

39.

Webber KH, Tate DF, Ward DS, Bowling JM. Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42:161–7.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:56–66.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, Forsyth LH, Roberts MB, Traficante RM. Efficacy of an individualized motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:174–80.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol. 1999;18:487–94.PubMedCrossRef

43.•

Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, et al. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e1. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that widely available text messaging technology can be used to produce weight loss. It also highlights the advantages of treatment tailoring and interactivity. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

44.

Shapiro JR, Koro T, Doran N, et al. Text4Diet: a randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. Prev Med. 2012;55:412–7.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Burke LE, Styn MA, Sereika SM, et al. Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:20–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

46.

Burke LE, Conroy MB, Sereika SM, et al. The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity. 2011;19:338–44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

47.

Burke LE, Styn MA, Glanz K, et al. SMART trial: a randomized clinical trial of self-monitoring in behavioral weight management-design and baseline findings. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:540–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

48.

Acharya SD, Elci OU, Sereika SM, Styn MA, Burke LE. Using a personal digital assistant for self-monitoring influences diet quality in comparison to a standard paper record among overweight/obese adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:583–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

49.

Spring B, Schneider K, McFadden HG, et al. Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:789–96.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

50.

Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-E-Call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1:e3.CrossRef

51.••

Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, et al. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1041. This randomized controlled trial is one of the first to use smartphone technology as a primary means of delivering behavioral weight loss treatment. The design also incorporates innovative uses of the technology for competition and peer support. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

52.

Klinkner W. The New Lose It! Lose It! Blog, Boston, MA; October, 2012. Available at: http://blog.loseit.com/2012/10/10/the-new-lose-it/. Accessed September 30, 2013.

53.•

Breton E, Fuemmeler B, Abroms L. Weight loss—there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:523–9. This study is important because it illustrates the lack of empirically validated weight loss strategies in commercial smartphone apps for weight loss, which have been downloaded millions of times. The findings of this paper suggest that partnerships between developers of commercial smartphone applications and academic researchers could be advantageous for producing the most sophisticated and effective weight loss applications. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

54.

Bacigalupo R, Cudd P, Littlewood C, Bissell P, Hawley MS, Buckley WH. Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14:279–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

55.

Omre AH. Bluetooth low energy: wireless connectivity for medical monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:457–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

56.

Gorini A, Gaggioli A, Vigna C, Riva G. A second life for eHealth: prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

57.

Sullivan DK, Goetz JR, Gibson CA, et al. Improving weight maintenance using virtual reality (Second Life). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45:264–8.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Yee N, Bailenson J. The Proteus Effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33:271–90.CrossRef

59.

Fox J, Bailenson JN. Virtual self-modeling: the effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol. 2009;12:1–25.CrossRef

60.

Entertain Software Association. 2013 sales, demographic and usage data: essential facts about the computer and video game industry Entertain Software Association, Washington, D.C.; 2013. Available at: http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2013.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2013.

61.

Rizzo AS, Lange B, Suma EA, Bolas M. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: new tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:256–64.CrossRef

62.

Lee W, Chae YM, Kim S, Ho SH, Choi I. Evaluation of a mobile phone-based diet game for weight control. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:270–5.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Wing RR, Pinto AM, Crane MM, Kumar R, Weinberg BM, Gorin AA. A statewide intervention reduces BMI in adults: Shape Up Rhode Island results. Obesity. 2009;17:991–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

64.

Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity. 2007;15:3091–6.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:2968–79.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1231–9.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, et al. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009;15:540–59.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Mulvaney S, Ritterband L, Bosslet L. Mobile intervention design in diabetes: review and recommendations. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:486–93.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Tran J, Tran R, White JR. Smartphone-based glucose monitors and applications in the management of diabetes: an overview of 10 salient “apps” and a novel smartphone-connected blood glucose monitor. Clin Diabetes. 2012;30:173–8.CrossRef

70.

Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity. 2013;21:25–31.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Review of Innovations in Digital Health Technology to Promote Weight Control
Authors: J. Graham Thomas
Dale S. Bond
Publication date: 01-05-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Current Diabetes Reports / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Electronic ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0485-1

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits

STEP AAG HeroTeaserCollection image/© Tarek / Generated with AI / Stock.adobe.com, ACC 2024 Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 Valvular Heart Disease: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, ACC 2024 HF and Cardiomyopathies: Year in Review/© 2024 American College of Cardiology, Woman out walking/© Seventyfour / stock.adobe.com (symbolic image with model), Woman checking smartwatch /© saltdium / stock.adobe.com (symbolic image with model), Cardiac catheterization/© Damian / stock.adobe.com

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Diabetes and Hemochromatosis

FTO and Obesity: Mechanisms of Association

The Sum of Many Parts: Potential Mechanisms for Improvement in Glucose Homeostasis After Bariatric Surgery

Bile Acid Sequestrants: Glucose-Lowering Mechanisms and Efficacy in Type 2 Diabetes

Cardiovascular Actions of GLP-1 and Incretin-Based Pharmacotherapy

Long-Term Health Outcomes in Offspring Born to Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage