Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiology Reports 12/2021

01-12-2021 | Stroke | Stroke (DL Tirschwell, Section Editor)

Stroke Prevention in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale

Authors: Alison Thaler, Alexandra Kvernland, Sean Kelly, Christopher Song, Hugo J. Aparicio, Brian Mac Grory, Shadi Yaghi

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is widely prevalent and studies have suggested an association with ischemic stroke. In this review, we aim to highlight current management of patients with ischemic stroke in the setting of PFO and discuss some areas of controversy.

Recent Findings

Upon reviewing the literature, we have found that the evidence regarding the management of patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO has come a long way in the past several years, and many uncertainties remain in clinical practice. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score helps to predict the probability of a pathogenic PFO, and recent trial data confirms the benefit of closure in carefully selected patients. The benefit of closure in older patients and in patients with alternate, competing mechanisms is still uncertain, and the long-term risks of closure are not known. Finally, the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this patient population as compared to other medical therapy or mechanical closure has not yet been investigated. Randomized data is needed to help answer these questions.

Summary

PFO closure is a safe and effective strategy in reducing stroke risk in carefully selected patients with cryptogenic stroke in the setting of a PFO. More studies are needed to test optimal medical treatment strategies and the safety and efficacy of PFO closure in patient subgroups not included in prior PFO closure trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(1):17–20.CrossRef Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59(1):17–20.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mojadidi MK, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(10):1183–5.CrossRef Mojadidi MK, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(10):1183–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hart RG, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38.CrossRef Hart RG, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kent DM, et al. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2013;81(7):619–25.CrossRef Kent DM, et al. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2013;81(7):619–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elgendy AY, et al. Proposal for updated nomenclature and classification of potential causative mechanism in patent foramen ovale-associated stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(7):878–86.CrossRef Elgendy AY, et al. Proposal for updated nomenclature and classification of potential causative mechanism in patent foramen ovale-associated stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(7):878–86.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Messe SR, et al. Practice advisory update summary: patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2020;94(20):876–85.CrossRef Messe SR, et al. Practice advisory update summary: patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2020;94(20):876–85.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mas JL, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1011–21.CrossRef Mas JL, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1011–21.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference • Diener HC, et al. Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1906–17. In this study, anticoagulation was not superior to aspirin in reducing recurrent stroke risk in patients with cryptogenic stroke and evidence of PFO. • Diener HC, et al. Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1906–17. In this study, anticoagulation was not superior to aspirin in reducing recurrent stroke risk in patients with cryptogenic stroke and evidence of PFO.
9.
go back to reference Kasner SE, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(12):1053–60.CrossRef Kasner SE, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(12):1053–60.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kent DM, et al. Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(35):2381–9.CrossRef Kent DM, et al. Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(35):2381–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saber H, et al. Network meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale management strategies in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2018;91(1):e1–7.CrossRef Saber H, et al. Network meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale management strategies in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2018;91(1):e1–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pristipino C, et al. European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(38):3182–95.CrossRef Pristipino C, et al. European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(38):3182–95.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Furlan AJ, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):991–9.CrossRef Furlan AJ, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):991–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Carroll JD, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1092–100.CrossRef Carroll JD, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1092–100.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meier B, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1083–91.CrossRef Meier B, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1083–91.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sondergaard L, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1033–42.CrossRef Sondergaard L, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1033–42.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saver JL, et al. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1022–32.CrossRef Saver JL, et al. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1022–32.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee PH, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(20):2335–42.CrossRef Lee PH, et al. Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(20):2335–42.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mir H, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e023761.CrossRef Mir H, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e023761.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Staubach S, et al. New onset atrial fibrillation after patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74(6):889–95.CrossRef Staubach S, et al. New onset atrial fibrillation after patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74(6):889–95.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oliva L, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60(2):165–74.CrossRef Oliva L, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60(2):165–74.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference • Chen JZ, Thijs VN. Atrial fibrillation following patent foramen ovale closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and clinical trials. Stroke. 2021:STROKEAHA120030293. This study confirms the increased odds of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing PFO closure (OR 5.3, 95% CI 2.50–11.41, p<0.001). • Chen JZ, Thijs VN. Atrial fibrillation following patent foramen ovale closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and clinical trials. Stroke. 2021:STROKEAHA120030293. This study confirms the increased odds of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing PFO closure (OR 5.3, 95% CI 2.50–11.41, p<0.001).
23.
go back to reference Ahmad Y, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(18):1638–49.CrossRef Ahmad Y, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(18):1638–49.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Turc G, et al. Closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review of randomized trials, sequential meta-analysis, and new insights from the CLOSE study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(12):e008356. CrossRef Turc G, et al. Closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review of randomized trials, sequential meta-analysis, and new insights from the CLOSE study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(12):e008356. CrossRef
25.
go back to reference • Garg A, et al. Recurrent stroke reduction with patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy based on patent foramen ovale characteristics: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiology. 2019;144;(1–2):40–49. This is meta-analysis of randomized trials testing PFO closure showing that among patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure is associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared to MT. Additionally, the benefit of PFO closure might be dependent on certain PFO characteristics. • Garg A, et al. Recurrent stroke reduction with patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy based on patent foramen ovale characteristics: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiology. 2019;144;(1–2):40–49. This is meta-analysis of randomized trials testing PFO closure showing that among patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure is associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared to MT. Additionally, the benefit of PFO closure might be dependent on certain PFO characteristics.
26.
go back to reference Vermeer SE, et al. Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions increase stroke risk in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1126–9.CrossRef Vermeer SE, et al. Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions increase stroke risk in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1126–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Debette S, et al. Association of MRI markers of vascular brain injury with incident stroke, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):600–6.CrossRef Debette S, et al. Association of MRI markers of vascular brain injury with incident stroke, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):600–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Clergeau MR, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts in patients with pulmonary embolism and a patent foramen ovale: a prospective diffusion-weighted MRI study. Stroke. 2009;40(12):3758–62.CrossRef Clergeau MR, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts in patients with pulmonary embolism and a patent foramen ovale: a prospective diffusion-weighted MRI study. Stroke. 2009;40(12):3758–62.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kim SJ, et al. Paradoxical embolism as a cause of silent brain infarctions in healthy subjects: the ICONS study (Identification of the Cause of Silent Cerebral Infarction in Healthy Subjects). Eur J Neurol. 2013;20(2):353–60.CrossRef Kim SJ, et al. Paradoxical embolism as a cause of silent brain infarctions in healthy subjects: the ICONS study (Identification of the Cause of Silent Cerebral Infarction in Healthy Subjects). Eur J Neurol. 2013;20(2):353–60.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Takafuji H, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of high-risk patent foramen ovale in the elderly. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(10):1657–62.CrossRef Takafuji H, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of high-risk patent foramen ovale in the elderly. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(10):1657–62.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wintzer-Wehekind J, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients older than 60 years of age with cryptogenic embolism. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020;73(3):219–24.CrossRef Wintzer-Wehekind J, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients older than 60 years of age with cryptogenic embolism. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020;73(3):219–24.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Powers WJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–418.CrossRef Powers WJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–418.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ahmed N, et al. Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11–13 November 2018. Eur Stroke J. 2019;4(4):307–17.CrossRef Ahmed N, et al. Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11–13 November 2018. Eur Stroke J. 2019;4(4):307–17.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Elgendy AY, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention. 2019;14(17):1788–90.CrossRef Elgendy AY, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention. 2019;14(17):1788–90.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Merkler AE, et al. Safety outcomes after percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. Stroke. 2017;48(11):3073–7.CrossRef Merkler AE, et al. Safety outcomes after percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. Stroke. 2017;48(11):3073–7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Horlick E, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement on operator and institutional requirements for PFO closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolic stroke: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(5):859–74.CrossRef Horlick E, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement on operator and institutional requirements for PFO closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolic stroke: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(5):859–74.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stroke Prevention in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale
Authors
Alison Thaler
Alexandra Kvernland
Sean Kelly
Christopher Song
Hugo J. Aparicio
Brian Mac Grory
Shadi Yaghi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01605-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Current Cardiology Reports 12/2021 Go to the issue

Stroke (DL Tirschwell, Section Editor)

Stroke Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (P Cremer, Section Editor)

Imaging Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy with Cardiac PET and Cardiac MRI

Hypertension (DS Geller and DL Cohen, Section Editors)

Is Isolated Diastolic Hypertension an Important Phenotype?

Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (E. Kevin Heist, Section Editor)

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department

Hypertension (DS Geller and DL Cohen, Section Editors)

Athletes and Hypertension