Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2019

01-08-2019 | Original Article

The non-drug costs associated with the administration of an intravenous biologic treatment in the hospital setting

Authors: Jodi Cronin, Stephen Moore, Niamh Lenihan, Marion O’Shea, Noel Woods

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Ireland, over 20,000 people are affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The licenced biologic therapies to treat moderate to severe IBD are reported to have similar effectiveness levels but differ in their methods of delivery. Certain therapies are administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in the hospital setting, others are delivered by subcutaneous injection in the community.

Aim

To determine the non-drug costs involved in administering an IV biologic infusion in the hospital setting.

Methods

This time-and-motion study was conducted at an Infusion Day Unit (IDU) in an Irish teaching hospital. The sequence and duration of each patient’s use of resources was recorded and costed. Bootstrap methods were applied to ensure that robust estimates of the accuracy of the non-parametric population statistics were reliably estimated.

Results

The mean time the patient spent at the IDU was 143.78 mins with a mean treatment time of 129.81 min. The main driver of patient time was the drug infusion time (39%), followed by the monitoring period (25%). The mean cost was €224.54 per treatment. Nurse time was the main expenditure driver (37%), followed by laboratory costs (27%) and other healthcare professional’s costs (14%).

Conclusions

The study confirms that the non-drug costs associated with the delivery of an IV biologic in the hospital setting are non-trivial. Given the current budgetary climate of health systems, the compounding prevalence of IBD and the expected increase in patient numbers, it is imperative that physicians also consider the opportunity costs associated with the method of treatment delivery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In the infusion suite, the nurse records vitals, inserts a cannula and, if necessary, takes urine/bloods from the patient which are sent for laboratory analysis. The nurse then leaves the patient and enters the drug preparation area to prepare the pre-treatment (anti-histamine and steroid preparation) and reconstitute the anti-TNF therapy for infusion. Following on from this, the nurse returns to the patient to administer the pre-treatment and infuse the drug. During the drug infusion, the patient is regularly monitored by the nurse. When the infusion is complete, the cannula is removed and vitals are re-checked.
 
2
For example, a ‘line in set’, used during the insertion of the cannula, consisted of gloves, a tourniquet, a swab, a cannula, an extension set, a sterile gauze, a tegaderm dressing, 5 ml of saline flush, surgical scrub and alcohol gel. A cost was derived for this set and its use assigned to a patient treatment.
 
3
Biologic therapies are only administered to patients considered to be of sufficiently robust health. Patients presenting with complicating conditions such as flu are examined by doctor to determine eligibility.
 
4
A ‘line in set’ is required during cannula insertion while a ‘line out set’ is required to remove it. As the drug is being prepared, each time a drug is reconstituted one ‘DPA—fixed set’ is used along with one or more, dose-dependent ‘DPA—variable sets’, the quantity of which are contingent upon patient bodyweight.
 
5
Nurse manager, pharmacy and registrar
 
6
Based on an 8-week treatment cycle
 
7
Induction therapy for the first three treatments and transitioning to maintenance therapy thereafter—estimated at 5.75 treatments
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ghosh S, Louis E, Beaugerie L, Bossuyt P, Bouguen G, Bourreille A, Ferrante M, Franchimont D, Frost K, Hebuterne X (2017) Development of the IBD disk: a visual self-administered tool for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 23(3):333–340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ghosh S, Louis E, Beaugerie L, Bossuyt P, Bouguen G, Bourreille A, Ferrante M, Franchimont D, Frost K, Hebuterne X (2017) Development of the IBD disk: a visual self-administered tool for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis 23(3):333–340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference M'koma AE (2013) Inflammatory bowel disease: an expanding global health problem. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 6 M'koma AE (2013) Inflammatory bowel disease: an expanding global health problem. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 6
3.
go back to reference Fiocchi C (1998) Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 115(1):182–205CrossRefPubMed Fiocchi C (1998) Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 115(1):182–205CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kaplan GG (2015) The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(12):720–727CrossRef Kaplan GG (2015) The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(12):720–727CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Burisch J, Munkholm P (2015) The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 50(8):942–951CrossRefPubMed Burisch J, Munkholm P (2015) The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 50(8):942–951CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Svenson LW, MacKenzie A, Koehoorn M, Jackson M, Fedorak R, Israel D, Blanchard JF (2006) The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1559–1568CrossRefPubMed Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Svenson LW, MacKenzie A, Koehoorn M, Jackson M, Fedorak R, Israel D, Blanchard JF (2006) The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1559–1568CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van der Valk ME, Mangen M-JJ, Severs M, van der Have M, Dijkstra G, van Bodegraven AA, Fidder HH, De Jong DJ, van der Woude CJ, Romberg-Camps MJ (2016) Evolution of costs of inflammatory bowel disease over two years of follow-up. PLoS One 11(4) Van der Valk ME, Mangen M-JJ, Severs M, van der Have M, Dijkstra G, van Bodegraven AA, Fidder HH, De Jong DJ, van der Woude CJ, Romberg-Camps MJ (2016) Evolution of costs of inflammatory bowel disease over two years of follow-up. PLoS One 11(4)
8.
go back to reference Van der Valk ME, Mangen M-JJ, Leenders M, Dijkstra G, van Bodegraven AA, Fidder HH, de Jong DJ, Pierik M, van der Woude CJ, Romberg-Camps MJ (2014) Healthcare costs of inflammatory bowel disease have shifted from hospitalisation and surgery towards anti-TNFα therapy: results from the COIN study. Gut 63(1):72–79CrossRefPubMed Van der Valk ME, Mangen M-JJ, Leenders M, Dijkstra G, van Bodegraven AA, Fidder HH, de Jong DJ, Pierik M, van der Woude CJ, Romberg-Camps MJ (2014) Healthcare costs of inflammatory bowel disease have shifted from hospitalisation and surgery towards anti-TNFα therapy: results from the COIN study. Gut 63(1):72–79CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Burisch J, Jess T, Martinato M, Lakatos PL, ECCO-EpiCom (2013) The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J Crohn’s Colitis 7(4):322–337CrossRef Burisch J, Jess T, Martinato M, Lakatos PL, ECCO-EpiCom (2013) The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J Crohn’s Colitis 7(4):322–337CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, Karmiris K, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Kucharzik T, Molnár T, Raine T, Sebastian S (2017) Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohn's Colitis 11(7):769–784CrossRef Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, Karmiris K, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Kucharzik T, Molnár T, Raine T, Sebastian S (2017) Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohn's Colitis 11(7):769–784CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, Tilg H, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Cullen GJ, Daperno M, Kucharzik T (2016) Third European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease 2016: part 1: diagnosis and medical management. J Crohn's Colitis 11(1):3–25CrossRef Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, Tilg H, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Cullen GJ, Daperno M, Kucharzik T (2016) Third European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease 2016: part 1: diagnosis and medical management. J Crohn's Colitis 11(1):3–25CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tsai H, Punekar Y, Morris J, Fortun P (2008) A model of the long-term cost effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28(10):1230–1239CrossRefPubMed Tsai H, Punekar Y, Morris J, Fortun P (2008) A model of the long-term cost effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28(10):1230–1239CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lindsay J, Punekar Y, Morris J, Chung-Faye G (2008) Health-economic analysis: cost-effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for Crohn’s disease—modelling outcomes in active luminal and fistulizing disease in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed Lindsay J, Punekar Y, Morris J, Chung-Faye G (2008) Health-economic analysis: cost-effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for Crohn’s disease—modelling outcomes in active luminal and fistulizing disease in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28(1):76–87CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bodger K, Kikuchi T, Hughes D (2009) Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30(3):265–274CrossRefPubMed Bodger K, Kikuchi T, Hughes D (2009) Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 30(3):265–274CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics (2018) Consumer price inflation, UK Office for National Statistics (2018) Consumer price inflation, UK
17.
go back to reference Office of the Attorney General (2003) Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2003 Office of the Attorney General (2003) Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2003
18.
go back to reference Office of the Attorney General (1988) Data Protection Act, 1988. Dublin, Ireland Office of the Attorney General (1988) Data Protection Act, 1988. Dublin, Ireland
19.
go back to reference Morris S, Devlin N, Parkin D (2007) Economic analysis in health care. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken Morris S, Devlin N, Parkin D (2007) Economic analysis in health care. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
20.
go back to reference Health Service Executive (2018) Consolidated salary scales in accordance with FEMPI 2015 and the Public Service Stability Agreements 2016-2020. Dublin, Ireland Health Service Executive (2018) Consolidated salary scales in accordance with FEMPI 2015 and the Public Service Stability Agreements 2016-2020. Dublin, Ireland
21.
go back to reference The Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit (2018) The public spending code: calculation of staff costs. Dublin, Ireland The Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit (2018) The public spending code: calculation of staff costs. Dublin, Ireland
22.
go back to reference Health Information and Quality Authority (2018) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. HIQA, Dublin, Ireland Health Information and Quality Authority (2018) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. HIQA, Dublin, Ireland
23.
go back to reference Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–75 Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–75
24.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Levy AR (2006) Pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoeconomics 24(11):1079–1086 Briggs AH, Levy AR (2006) Pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoeconomics 24(11):1079–1086
25.
go back to reference Central Statistics Office (2017) Earnings and labour costs annual data 2016. CSO, Cork Central Statistics Office (2017) Earnings and labour costs annual data 2016. CSO, Cork
26.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2008) Infliximab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis—technology appraisal guidance [TA134]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2008) Infliximab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis—technology appraisal guidance [TA134]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
27.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Etanercept and efalizumab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis—technology appraisal guidance [TA103]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Etanercept and efalizumab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis—technology appraisal guidance [TA103]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
28.
go back to reference Chen Y-F, Jobanputra P, Barton P, Jowett S, Bryan S, Clark W, Fry-Smith A, Burls A (2006) A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 10(42):1–266CrossRef Chen Y-F, Jobanputra P, Barton P, Jowett S, Bryan S, Clark W, Fry-Smith A, Burls A (2006) A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 10(42):1–266CrossRef
29.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis—technology appraisal guidance [TA104]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis—technology appraisal guidance [TA104]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
30.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2010) Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis—technology appraisal guidance [TA199]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2010) Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis—technology appraisal guidance [TA199]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London
31.
go back to reference Department of Health (2016) Department of health statement of strategy 2016–2019. Department of Health, Dublin Department of Health (2016) Department of health statement of strategy 2016–2019. Department of Health, Dublin
Metadata
Title
The non-drug costs associated with the administration of an intravenous biologic treatment in the hospital setting
Authors
Jodi Cronin
Stephen Moore
Niamh Lenihan
Marion O’Shea
Noel Woods
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1925-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2019 Go to the issue